
Sigma male, former El. Engineer, INTP, Anti-religious, 🎵🎶 , 🏎️ Wind&Solar is a dead end → ⚛️ #nuclear #Realpolitik
Switzerland
Joined August 2009
- Tweets12.8K
- Following144
- Followers347
- Likes258K
Pinned Tweet
What to do with nuclear waste in a nutshell, by @WorksInProgMag open.substack.com/pub/worksi…
Daͷ Müιιεя ☢️🇨🇭 retweeted
Replying to @RSA_Observer
Both of these proposals are simply Minsk 3-style temporary agreements designed to get Russia to lift its devastating Black Sea blockade on Ukraine. Both result in a stunning NATO victory, with the bloc controlling, in one way or another, 80% of pre-war Ukraine.
But Putin just has to continue the blockade for another year or so, go easy on the ground war, and concentrate on raising Europe's costs of supporting Ukraine. Let's not forget that during WWI, even after Germany had signed the armistice, the Western powers maintained their blockade of Berlin until the final peace treaty was signed. Russia is likely to follow this precedent until Ukraine signs a deal that effectively neuters it as a geopolitical risk to Russia.
The US presidency is the most dangerous office in the world.
Here are the top 3 best and worst presidents ever:
Let's start with the best:
1. Grover Cleveland vetoed 414 bills in his first term alone, including congressional handouts to drought-stricken Texas farmers in 1887, on the grounds that the Constitution authorized no such charity. He was right.
2. Warren Harding inherited the sharp 1920-21 depression and did almost nothing, cutting federal spending from $6.4 billion to $3.3 billion and slashing tax rates. The economy recovered within eighteen months, precisely because Washington stepped aside.
3. John Tyler, largely forgotten today, vetoed a national bank bill twice, endured expulsion from the Whig Party, and refused to let Henry Clay transform the Treasury into a political instrument.
These three men share a rare quality: they treated the federal government as a cage, not a tool.
Now the worst.
3. Abraham Lincoln suspended habeas corpus, imprisoned 14,000 political opponents without trial, shut down opposition newspapers, and conscripted men at gunpoint. The war's financing required the Legal Tender Acts of 1862, which forced irredeemable paper greenbacks on US citizens regardless of what contracts previously specified. Centralization of federal power over the states never fully reversed after 1865. The constitutional republic that emerged was a different animal from the one that entered.
2. Woodrow Wilson delivered the Federal Reserve in 1913, the income tax through the Sixteenth Amendment, the military draft, and the Espionage Act, which could imprison anyone for criticizing the war. He segregated the federal civil service. He took the country into a European slaughter with a propaganda apparatus, the Committee on Public Information, designed to manufacture consent. Every major expansion of state power in the twentieth century traces a direct line back to Wilson's two terms.
1. Franklin Roosevelt gets the top prize for catastrophe. He criminalized gold ownership via Executive Order 6102 in 1933, forcing Americans to surrender their gold at $20.67 per ounce, then immediately revalued it to $35, confiscating roughly 41 percent of savings held in the hardest monetary form available. He extended a cyclical recession into a decade-long depression through the National Industrial Recovery Act, agricultural price controls, and relentless uncertainty about property rights. Businesses do not invest when the rules change by executive whim every quarter. Real unemployment never fell below 14 percent throughout the 1930s. He packed the Supreme Court when it resisted. The regulatory state you live inside today, with its 188,000 pages of federal rules, grew from seeds Roosevelt planted between 1933 and 1945.
Power corrupts budgets, currencies, and constitutions with equal efficiency. The best presidents understood their job was to leave you alone.
Daͷ Müιιεя ☢️🇨🇭 retweeted
Replying to @jreichelt
Wir könnten die gesamte Politikerkaste durch KI ersetzen und zudem noch die meisten Beamten.
Daͷ Müιιεя ☢️🇨🇭 retweeted
Replying to @WarMonltor
No he’s not. The U.S. is still using Ukraine to further their own strategic interests of overextending Russia, and they have no incentive to stop. Any disagreements regarding Starlink and oil deals with Russia are minor and massively exaggerated.
Ukraine was never an ally of the U.S. America uses them as a proxy and doesn’t care about what happens to them, as long as the war is able to continue.
Daͷ Müιιεя ☢️🇨🇭 retweeted
There is always the question of why people are losing patience with the old politics around the world.
In the United States, in Europe, in Latin America, no one can stand the maintainers of the status quo anymore.
And in Europe, the problem is hidden in cowardice.
German Chancellor Merz recently said:
“My biggest concern right now is not our economy, not the European Union, not America, not China.
My biggest concern is the impact of Russia on our society and how they are managing to destabilize our societies.”
This is the greatest synthesis of what I have been saying for a long time. Europe has clung to the excuse of a Russian threat so it does not have to discuss what really matters.
Every month some European intelligence service claims that the Russians are planning an invasion.
Instead of carrying out the reforms society actually wants, they perpetuate insecurity and fear. Fortunately, few people in Europe believe this narrative.
Where is the German leader’s speech about a major plan to make energy cheaper and bring companies back? There is none.
Where is the speech on replacing Russian gas cheaply? There is none.
Where is the speech about building new relationships with the supply chains that Europe has lacked, and lacked badly? There is none.
Where and when will this European cowardice give way to serious and independent policies?
And this does not apply only to German leadership. I could give several other examples.
When there is no Russian invasion planned for next week, they talk about Chinese sabotage. It is never them, always the others.
Let us hope the new European generations are able to take back the reins and build a future with seriousness.
Daͷ Müιιεя ☢️🇨🇭 retweeted
Replying to @RSA_Observer @vtchakarova
Putin lost trust in the West pretty early already, when G.W.Bush began to let the neocons run amok.
Daͷ Müιιεя ☢️🇨🇭 retweeted
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov of @mfa_russia spotted with Maria Zakharova handing out pancakes and Matryoshka dolls to protestors in Paris.
How very dare they!
Daͷ Müιιεя ☢️🇨🇭 retweeted
Here’s then-Ukrainian President Leonid Kravchuk explaining to parliament in February 1994 that Kiev didn't control the nuclear weapons on its territory and explaining that they had to be transferred to Russia.
“The nuclear button, the entire command infrastructure are in Moscow, no one will ever let us take control,” he said.
“Nuclear weapons can’t serve as a deterrent, they're a threat to ourselves.”
Yes, newly independent Ukraine, Belarus and Kazakhstan inherited Soviet nuclear weapons on their territories in 1991, but lacked independent operational control, with launch authorisation remaining in Moscow. Concerned about nuclear proliferation, Washington pressed for their transfer to Russia (with the three countries receiving financial assistance and other compensation in return).
The 1994 Budapest Memorandum provided security assurances (but not a NATO-style mutual defence guarantee) and in 2013, the US explicitly stated that it wasn't legally binding. Incidentally, Washington was the first signatory to breach the terms, when it imposed sanctions on Belarus (breaching the memorandum’s prohibition on economic coercion).
Daͷ Müιιεя ☢️🇨🇭 retweeted
Well intentioned but genuinely evil.
American tipping culture is cancer and spreading it abroad is equivalent to international terrorism.
Just write a 5/5 review. In Japan 5/5 actually means something.
Daͷ Müιιεя ☢️🇨🇭 retweeted
Replying to @BrianMcDonaldIE
It's always 1939 (or another WW2 date for that matter), since in propaganda, every adversary automatically qualifies as Hitler.
Daͷ Müιιεя ☢️🇨🇭 retweeted
What do you do if you go to the doctor's office and you are in the waiting room and this book is casually there on the table?
Daͷ Müιιεя ☢️🇨🇭 retweeted
Pat Buchanan, 1999:
“By moving NATO onto Russia’s front porch, we have scheduled a twenty-first century confrontation. … America will face a hellish dilemma: risk confrontation with a nuclear-armed Russia determined to recreate its old sphere of influence, or renege on solemn commitments and see NATO collapse.”
Therefore, he said, “Offering NATO memberships to Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and, as some urge, Ukraine is rashness bordering on madness.” Referring to maps the Clinton team must have ignored, Buchanan warned, “This would put the Russian base at Kaliningrad behind NATO lines and bring into a U.S.-led alliance three nations with huge Russian minorities.” Foreseeing future conflict, he observed that “Latvia is almost half Russian; eastern Ukraine, almost entirely Russian. America could neither defend nor liberate these nations without the risk of nuclear war.”
Pat Buchanan, A Republic, Not an Empire: Reclaiming America’s Destiny (New York: Regnery, 1999), 17–18, 22.
Daͷ Müιιεя ☢️🇨🇭 retweeted
Good to see sanity return to the tired continent, @gideonrachman.
Since the Europeans have such great difficulty in understanding Russia, let me explain. The second option is just not going to fly. Ukraine will never join Nato. It will either be destroyed or it will be neutral.
The first can work. But Putin is going to demand curbs on flows of Western arms and intelligence to Ukraine. In addition, Ukraine will have to formally neutral, not just excluded from Nato. Then it will be acceptable to the Russians that unoccupied Ukraine can enjoy unimpeded economic intercourse with Europe.
The Russians are also going to demand that Western sanctions are removed, and Russian assets unfrozen.
Finally, there is no chance in hell that the Russians would accept any deal with Europe that does not include the signature of the US president. Europe cannot strike a deal with Moscow that excludes the US. The reason is very simple. If the US does not fully participate in the peace agreement, then the Russian security problem has not been solved.
The alternative is a great power concert that leaves Europe out entirely.
ft.com/content/92f271fd-f96c…
Daͷ Müιιεя ☢️🇨🇭 retweeted
Replying to @vonderburchard
„Es kann nicht ausgeschlossen werden…“ ist als Einstiegssatz die absolute Negierung von Journalismus. Es kann in Folge leider auch nicht ausgeschlossen werden, dass @vonderburchard ein Einflussagent Moskaus ist, mit dem Ziel, die Reputation von @politico endgültig zu zerstören.
Daͷ Müιιεя ☢️🇨🇭 retweeted
Russian Kosmos 2612 and ICEYE-X36 (providing Ukraine military support) are now in perfect sync with each other. The Russian military satellite is intentionally stalking and tracking the Western radar satellite. Keeping a satellite "bumper-to-bumper" in this manner allows Russia to intercept or jam data transmissions, physically inspect Western technology, or quickly pivot to execute a kinetic or non-kinetic anti-satellite (ASAT) attack with very little warning or fuel expenditure.
Kosmos 2612 executed a series of highly precise, fuel-heavy maneuvers to force itself into a "coplanar" orbit—matching ICEYE-X36's exact altitude (~555 km), speed, and inclination (~97.8°). The ICEYE-X36 satellite is giving the Ukraine military support.
Daͷ Müιιεя ☢️🇨🇭 retweeted
I am often asked, "isn't there a chance Trump had some ideas or good intentions upon taking office?"
Answer: No - there is zero chance Trump had any relevant ideas or ambitions of his own coming into office.
Elected officials in the US hold zero power besides rubber stamping policy put in front of them, selling it to the public, and/or creating drama to distract public attention away from policies.
Trump was/is no exception.
This is why I correctly predicted even before his first term in office he was going to be 100% committed to continuity of agenda.
This was a warning back in 2016 before Trump's first term in office: landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2…
I also warned about Obama in 2012 before he started his second term: landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2…
Do people think it is "luck" that I'm always right about this - or are they ready to at least consider Western politics are a layer of orchestrated control rather than one of "self-determination" or a means of "change?"
(Note: before I started doing videos I wrote under several pen names including "Tony Cartalucci" just in case anyone was wondering why my name isn't on these articles).
































