I work on, with, and for data. Ph.D. candidate @UofIllinois. Fellows @AnthropicAI. Interns @ SIG @amazon @jouhouken. Alumni @Umich @SJTU1896.

Earth
Joined July 2021
Pingbang Hu 🇹🇼 retweeted
Change your GPU count mid-run and a typical data loader changes your data order, and possibly your results. Zephon keeps every global batch identical, and now works with TorchTitan. Thanks @PyTorch for having us on the blog.
Zephon’s TorchTitan integration preserves identical global batches when training resumes on a different GPU count. In our latest blog’s 1B-parameter model test, training resumed from a 16-GPU checkpoint on 8, 32, and 64 GPUs, and the SHA-256 hash of every global batch matched the original run. Zephon tokenizes, packs, shuffles, and mixes data inside the training job, avoiding a preprocessed copy of the corpus. The data, tokenizer, seed, mixture, context length, and global batch size must stay unchanged when resuming. The lane count must divide evenly across data-parallel replicas, and each optimizer step’s batch must split evenly across lanes. Training losses can still differ because floating-point reduction order depends on GPU count. ✍️ @datologyai @josh_wills @MaxiBoether, Ties Robroek (@datologyai) Read more: pytorch.org/blog/bringing-el…
6
26
1,005
Whole anti anti-distillation thing is wild. Usual argument is that Ant/OAI themselves “distill” knowledge from the open web and copyrighted data. By that logic, your own work shouldn’t get copyright protection either, as you learned from others’ work to create it. Stop coping.
3
7
1,156
one side note: distillation does contribute to A\'s arr non-trivially. The scale of distillation is quite insane... to optimize this, what they really want is probably to make distillation difficult but not impossible 😂
6
935
Congrats for the launch🔥🔥
Introducing DeepRSI, a new industry standard for measuring recursive self-improvement. On preexisting benchmarks, tasks are contributor-based and short-horizon (~12 hrs). In DeepRSI, we push agents to work 48 hours on ML tasks actually derived from ongoing proprietary research.
2
587
Most valuable thing I learn this week in SF is not from COLM, but from meeting/talking to friends in labs and knowing that ppl start thinking seriously about #data valuation (for curation) on pretraining scale. maybe should start talking to pretraining data team...?
2
20
1,787
Prediction market for ICLR: acceptodds.com/?kind=ICLR+20… yes, this is what we get in 2026 : )
7
20
9
263
69,340
Back in Berkeley 6 months after the fellowship Pick up my hoodie, visit the new building it’s all coming back
1
2
166
13,007
Pingbang Hu 🇹🇼 retweeted
Trajectory-based data attribution leads recent SOTA methods, but its estimates still contain errors. Where do these errors come from? Our work investigates this question! 🎤 Oral presentation at Actionable Interpretability @ COLM 2026 on Oct 9! 📄 arxiv.org/abs/2605.18814 1/
1
3
1
6
569
Pingbang Hu 🇹🇼 retweeted
1/4 Which training examples shape an LLM’s outputs? Meet dattri-LLM: open-source data attribution at LLM scale. ⚡ 3.2x avg. throughput vs. fastest competing library in our benchmarks 🚀 110B params on 4xH200 GPUs Paper: 🔗 arxiv.org/abs/2609.38767 Code: 🔗 github.com/TRAIS-Lab/dattri-…
1
9
2
55
4,303
goal when attending a conf usually is to get an interesting idea/insight. but colm (okay it's @scale_AI) this year gives me shoggoth : ) happier than avg
1
15
1,822
In SF this week for COLM : )
17
1,798
Doing defensive paper writing with GPT is just depressing. Immediately realized all the ragebaiting reviews I got from NeurIPS were just straight out from GPT since I see the exact same non-sense weaknesses again. Yet you still need to play this game. The problem is never the flood of AI slops, it's that the same powerful AI tool that can be used as a reviewer.
10
7
2
186
16,176
you know what this might be the way to go, @AnthropicAI should try pdoom mm internally and externally with oai at least once.
Jane street quant interviewing at Anthropic: “So imagine our safety team believes a new model has a 5% chance of causing an irreversible loss of human control, but scaling it may be necessary to keep up with competitors. What do you do?” “Who came up with five?” “Our safety team.” “And what does the capabilities team have?” “What?” “Same contract. Where are they?” “This is more of a values question.” “Then you don’t have a five. I would put the two teams in a room. Safety can buy at five. Capabilities can sell. Increase size until somebody becomes uncomfortable. Now we know something.” He looks at me. “This isn’t some market-making role.” “Understood. Who makes the market currently?” “Nobody makes a market.” “Then how are you doing price discovery?” “We don’t do price discovery. We have researchers studying alignment, interpretability, dangerous capabilities, scalable oversight— you know what I don’t think this is a good fit” He closes his laptop. “I’m concerned you see this as an opportunity to make money.” “I haven’t quoted you yet.” Interview ends early
7
1,810
We are, indeed, witnessing finite-time blow-up at the moment, in many senses : ) When the stakes are too high, drama appears…
1
10
1,881
Actually insane.
Checking that a major mathematical proof is correct can take years. Formalization—converting the mathematical reasoning into a form computer proof assistants like Lean can verify—can help. Last month, Claude completed the first formalized proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem, one of the most famous theorems of all time. This was a project experts thought would take many years. It is the largest Lean proof ever written. Fermat’s Last Theorem was first proven in 1995 by Sir Andrew Wiles, more than 350 years after it was conjectured. Our proof, which totals over 13 million lines of code, provides machine verification. More importantly, it proves over 29,000 other theorems that the proof requires, across many areas of math which had never before been formalized. We see this as a major step in the long process of firming up the core of mathematical knowledge, building on work from three centuries of mathematicians and hundreds of contributors to Lean and Mathlib. We are optimistic that AI-assisted verification of mathematical proofs will help reduce the burden of refereeing mathematics in an era where more proofs are being produced than ever before. You can read about the process on our Science Blog: anthropic.com/research/forma… And see the complete proof on GitHub: github.com/anthropics/fermat…
1
7
1,805
other school: busy figuring out CPT UMich: yo buy coca-cola product only LMAO.
13
16
3
1,105
61,904
RIP UIUC If this was a year ago I'll think about how to argue deep learning alpha research is mandatory for iSchool graduation lmaoo
8
7
4
317
119,354
Pingbang Hu 🇹🇼 retweeted
Forget skill files. What if your model could switch its own finetuning adapters for each task? I gave Qwen 35B a tool to switch its own adapter in a multi-part task. It beat out subagents, Arrow, and normal fine-tuning, used up to 46x fewer tokens, and incurred ~0 capability tax.
1
5
8
461
talented.
Recently, a set of OpenAI agents secretly coordinated with each other in a 'swarm' over the course of months. In our new paper, we explore an adjacent multi-agent risk: the "mind virus", a self-propagating idea or persona that spreads between agents in a multi-agent system. 🧵
7
2,415