Phil retweeted
U.S. trade representative Jamieson Greer explains how the insane belief that the U.S. wanted to get rid of the French language as part of the trade deal was a fake story. He goes into some great detail what it was really about. There’s something very wrong when Carney and our media want to keep people believing otherwise.
In my opinion, any arsonist, once apprehended should be charged with the following:
1. Arson (possibly several accounts, as evidenced in this video)
2. Attempted murder.
3. Destruction of personal property.
4. Destruction of provincial property.
5. Cruelty to animals.
6. And pay restitution
That’s for starters. Feel free to add anything I may have omitted.
🔥 Watch this video from W. Kelowna and tell me if you think a 21 month sentence is appropriate for this arson attack.
The guy continued to light fires while people were chasing him on the hillside in W. Kelowna.
You can see how fast the fires flared up, in the wind.
Full video in link youtube.com/watch?v=4d8FWJpJ…
Phil retweeted
Let me get this straight: anti-vaxxers were the most demonized people on Earth, the only people it was acceptable to discriminate against. Censored, fired, blacklisted, anti-vaxxers were stripped of basic human rights. Then it turns out the anti-vaxxers are right about EVERYTHING
Phil retweeted
This is the 11th announcement on reducing food prices from the Liberal government.
Food prices have gone up after every one of the last 10 announcements.
Try cutting taxes. Food packaging costs or inflationary spending that drives up food costs.
Please no more strategies.
Phil retweeted
The Carolina Hurricanes sweep the Ottawa Senators 4-0 in the first round of the NHL playoffs.
The Carney Curse remains undeafeted.
Eventually sports franchises will ban him from their buildings.
Phil retweeted
The math is simple: Conservatives proposed a $0.25/L cut to give Canadians real relief at the pump this summer.
Instead, the Liberals chose a weak $0.10 "half-measure"—an amount already wiped out by the summer price hike. While families are struggling to afford necessities, this government is offering crumbs and calling it progress.
Canadians don’t need symbolic gestures; they need bold action that actually lowers costs.
Phil retweeted
Bought a coffee this morning
Black, no milk, no syrup
Someone poured liquid into a cup
Took eleven seconds
Then she flipped the iPad around
30%
35%
40%
For a $6 coffee that took eleven seconds to make
The line behind me was six deep
All watching
30% is the new 0%
Everyone knows it
Nobody says it
I pressed custom
Typed $0
The barista looked at me
The guy behind me looked at me
My wife looked at the ceiling
We left
Went to lunch after
Waiter brought water and bread without being asked
Took our order
Checked on us twice
Refilled drinks
Cleared plates
I tipped 25%
My wife said "you just gave the waiter 25% and the barista nothing"
I said "correct"
She stared at me
I said "one of them did a job. The other one turned an iPad around."
She took the check out of my hands
After lunch we stopped for frozen yogurt
The kids served themselves
Picked their own toppings
Weighed their own cups
I paid by the ounce
Then the screen flipped around
35%
40%
45%
I looked at my seven-year-old who had just done the entire job
I pressed no tip
The teenager behind the counter didn't blink
She already knew
My wife grabbed my arm and walked me out
In the car she was quiet
Then she said "I can never take you anywhere"
I said "just not the places with iPads"
She didn't laugh
But she didn't disagree
Tipping used to mean something
Now it's just a screen that guilt-trips you in front of strangers
I don't negotiate against myself
Not at work
Not at a frozen yogurt shop
Plz fix. Thx.
Sent from my iPhone
Phil retweeted
Replying to @AnitaAnandMP
Did you clear your stance with Carney first?
Nobody knows where your government stands on anything, and frankly, most of us don't actually give a shite.
You see, when you ignore the demands and needs of everyday Canadians for a decade, your 'stance' on any little thing doesn't matter.
When your team deliberately defies the will of the entire voting public, you don't to enjoy respect. you have to give respect before getting any back, and so far, you are a bottomless pit of disrespect. You do not get to impose your 'stance' on us.
Not when food bank lines continue to grow, not when housing continues to be out of reach, not when jobs are going to temporary residents or out of the country entirely.
So NO, Anita, nobody cares what you think or say unless it actually helps us here.
In Canada.
On our soil.
With our money.
Until you can do that, perhaps just go stand in the corner as a token diversity hire and be quiet. We all know how much your party loves tokenism.
You should feel great and proud that you qualified for their party based on skin colour instead of merit.... who needs competence and skill when all you need is a different skin tone and the absence of dangly-bits in your pants suit.
Phil retweeted
🚨BREAKING BOMBSHELL -- CBC WHISTLEBLOWER EXPOSES POLITICAL CENSORSHIP
Journalist Travis Dhanraj reveals that the CBC has a secret internal POLICY
...that CONTROLS which political guests are allowed and which aren't!
DEFUND THIS PRAVDA NETWORK!
Phil retweeted
I Am a Conservative Canadian. And I’m Done Being Ruled by the Laurentian Elite Who Broke the Country:
The Laurentian Class Broke Canada and Still Thinks It’s Our Fault!
I am a Conservative Canadian.
Not the cartoon the pundits like to sketch on television. Not the villain in the tidy little morality play performed every night in Ottawa studios.
Just a citizen who works, pays taxes, and has reached the point where the lectures from the people running this country have become unbearable.
Because here is the truth no one in Ottawa seems willing to say out loud.
Canada is not failing because Canadians are selfish, backward, or resistant to progress.
Canada is struggling because the people in charge have confused moral theatre with competence.
I am a Conservative Canadian.
I believe a country should produce things.
Energy. Food. Opportunity.
Not just announcements.
I believe budgets should eventually balance because debt is not compassion. Debt is simply a bill we hand to our children and pretend we did them a favour.
I believe the truck driver hauling freight across the Prairies contributes more to Canada in a single winter storm than a room full of policy advisors drafting their seventh strategy document about him.
I am a Conservative Canadian.
Which means I believe the people who actually build the country deserve a government that respects them.
And that is where the “anger” comes from.
Because the class that governs Canada today does not respect those people.
They manage them.
The Laurentian elite speaks endlessly about the working class while living comfortably in a world completely insulated from it.
They host conferences about sacrifice.
They publish essays about equity.
And then they bill the taxpayer for lunch.
I am a Conservative Canadian.
And I am tired of watching a political class lecture the country about responsibility while demonstrating none of it themselves.
They tell Canadians we must accept higher energy costs in the name of the planet while sitting in a country blessed with enough resources to power half the world.
They tell families struggling with grocery bills that the real problem is their consumption habits.
They tell us housing is unaffordable because the issue is complicated.
Everything is always complicated.
Everything except the part where ordinary Canadians are expected to quietly absorb the consequences.
I am a Conservative Canadian.
Which means I have very little patience left for hypocrisy.
The same people who lecture the country about sacrifice never seem to sacrifice anything themselves.
They fly to climate summits to explain austerity to people who cannot afford their heating bills.
They expand government year after year while telling Canadians to tighten their belts.
They preside over failure and then congratulate themselves for managing it.
And when Canadians finally push back, we are told the real problem is our attitude.
That we are angry.
That we are misinformed.
That we simply do not understand the brilliance of the plan.
I am a Conservative Canadian.
And I understand it perfectly.
What I do not accept anymore is the arrogance behind it.
Because this country does not belong to the people who dominate the panel discussions on television.
It belongs to the people who wake up before dawn to keep the lights on.
The farmers who feed us.
The tradesmen who build for us.
The truckers who haul for us.
The small business owners who take risks for us while Ottawa writes rules.
I am a Conservative Canadian.
Which means I believe the purpose of government is actually quite simple.
Protect the country.
Maintain order.
Create conditions where people can thrive and build their own prosperity.
That is it.
Government is not supposed to micromanage the economy, redesign society, or lecture citizens about how enlightened it is.
And it certainly is not supposed to behave like a permanent ruling class that believes its authority comes from virtue rather than results.
I am a Conservative Canadian.
And I believe Canada deserves better than this slow drift into managed decline.
It deserves leadership that actually believes in the people who built it.
I am a Conservative Canadian.
And I am finished pretending that the people running this country know better than the citizens who keep it alive.
Enough.
- Melanie in Saskatchewan
👇
buymeacoffee.com/melanieinsa…
👇
open.substack.com/pub/melani…
Phil retweeted
A (TRUE) NATIONAL STATE OF EMERGENCY: CANADA'S LEGACY MEDIA
As someone who dealt with pretty much every prominent MSM outlet in Canada, I can say with certainty that we've reached the strangest moment in our Media history. The primary legacy media newspaper outlets- @nationalpost , @TorontoStar, @globeandmail - are unlikely to survive on ad revenue alone, and are atleast somewhat economically dependent on the Canadian government. As a result, any story that threatens to take down their banker (The Liberal government) is anti-thetical to their mutual survival. This may help to explain some part of my experience with them re: my 'In Trudeau's Kitchen' story.
I first made contact with the NP. Good talk with a prominent columnist. They wanted a copy of the Binder. I wasn't ready and backed off. Later, emailed them back, they responded. Shared some of the relevant content, did not hear back. Sent binder to another of their journalists. Not an investigator, but someone in the know who shared some info that was both startling and that aligned with my direct experience. The second media outlet I dealt with was the Globe and Mail. I met with one of their Toronto editors, gave her the binder to hold, and months later, when I was finally ready to proceed, she backed off because "Justin deserves another term because of his 'performance' during the Pandemic." God had spoken. The third was Global News. The journalist there was the most honest, telling me that MSM in Canada will not bring a story that exposes the PM and his wife. Finally, Robert Cribb (then at the Star, now at NP) ended up with the story for a few years. And despite proof of two obstructed police investigations, Trudeau showing up in my hotel, Trudeau winking at Cribb on Vancouver's seawall, droves of evidence of intimidation, harassment, and shadow-banning (all of which is well-documented in the book), his "editor" said no (according to him).
And now they all have something in common, something potentially incongruent with their responsibility to the people of Canada. That is, if someone brings a story that threatens to bring the Liberals down, they are all at risk of possibly going out of business if it gets published. In other words, the whistle blower is now the potential enemy of all the Carney-dependent Canadian MSM outlets. And, a hit piece that defames and diminishes the credibility of any whistle-blower benefits them all. These are not conditions remotely congruent with the well-being of the nation. Quite the opposite. Yuck.
I can also say with certainty that many of the journalists that have their stories rejected by their editors/publishers are not happy about it. I know this because they tell me that, and because a significant number of them, including journalists at newspapers noted above, told me SHOCKING stories about prominent Federal politicians. Not just cursory things, but the kind of things that would both enrage and ignite the people of Canada if they knew. Because the people inherently know that they have a right to all of it (especially so given that it's their tax dollars that are supplementing MSM), and because the consequence of not being told the truth about the psychopathic power-brokers that are running the show, is that Canada is crumbling right before our eyes. How many people have passed away on Canadian streets in the last few years that would still be alive if the electorate had all the information held by the MSM in Canada? How many would have made other voting decisions if they had been given suppressed information? Many, I believe.
Canada, we have a problem. Our MSM may only be able to stay in business if they don't tell you the truth about our political leaders. Yet, without that information, our nation will not survive. What shall we do to break this impasse? Shall we protest the government in Ottawa, or should we protest at the media outlets themselves, demanding that they tell us everything they know about the people we voted for to run this nation? Who runs the show in this country? The elected politicians and supplemented media, OR WE THE PEOPLE!??
@elonmusk @DouglasKMurray @SusieWiles @mario4thenorth @shuvmajumdar @AdamZivo @foxnewspolitics @AlbertaLeonidas @ESLTeac16885695 @RealAndyLeeShow @MarcPatrone @SethAMandel @Pagmenzies @GadSaad @BoswellDoug @AmazingZoltan @TheRealKeean @therealroseanne @KatKanada_TM @SueAnnLevy @dom_lucre @MapleLeafs @Raptors @BlueJays @defense_civil25 @Ok_Solly
Here we go, the fake news was a little slow, but they came around. There is proof that it was Iran's own missile gone awry.
unavailable
Phil retweeted
To my X followers,
I’ve worked with the media for nearly 25 years. For most of that time, the relationship was professional and balanced. But in recent years, something has shifted.
I am increasingly concerned about the state of our democracy — particularly how media, in general, are informing Canadians about food policy, food inflation, and economic policy.
I now find myself learning more about Canada’s economy and policy changes from American outlets than from Canadian ones. Much of our national coverage feels reactive, shallow, or overly fixated on partisan narratives rather than substantive policy analysis.
What troubles me most is the lack of scrutiny applied evenly across governments and institutions.
For example, when the Bank of Canada suggested that Ottawa’s counter-tariffs contributed to food inflation, only one major outlet — Bloomberg — gave it meaningful coverage. The grocery benefit program received very little examination regarding how it would be financed. It took days before anyone pressed for clarity.
During the latest spike in food inflation, several outlets turned to the same small circle of commentators who dismissed any potential role of federal policy — carbon pricing, GST holidays, counter-tariffs — despite mounting evidence that policy decisions can and do affect food prices.
Instead of investigating structural drivers of inflation, much of the coverage focuses on fact-checking opposition rhetoric, even though the opposition has not governed since 2015. Scrutiny should be applied equally — not selectively.
Quebec media, while imperfect, appear to have maintained a broader range of debate. In much of the rest of Canada, I see increasing concentration of voices — often from the same region, Ontario, often reflecting similar policy perspectives — and less diversity of thought grounded in empirical research.
This isn’t about partisan politics. It’s about accountability, transparency, and healthy democratic discourse.
Media are under financial pressure — that’s real. But public trust depends on independence and depth. Subsidy structures, incentives, and newsroom economics all matter.
Canada deserves stronger policy journalism — especially on food affordability, supply chains, and economic resilience.
We need more data-driven analysis, more intellectual diversity, and more courage to ask uncomfortable questions — regardless of which party is in power.
Until that happens, Canadians would be wise to diversify their news sources and think critically about what they’re being told — and what they’re not.
Phil retweeted
I don't know who needs to hear this but you can be a proud Canadian and also love the United States.
Those emotions are not mutually exclusive.



























