Incase you ask from if it’s true 👇🏼 Yes, this claim is true. Virtually all of the specific details you outlined regarding the congressional testimony and the Department of Justice files are accurate and verified by official proceedings and investigative reporting. The primary claims you raised are broken down by what actually happened: 1. The "Paying Clients" Testimony Before Congress In March 2026, Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime accountant and estate co-executor, Richard Kahn, sat for a seven-hour closed-door deposition before the House Oversight Committee. Under oath, Kahn testified that he was under the impression Epstein earned his wealth legitimately as a tax adviser and financial planner. Committee Chairman James Comer confirmed that Kahn identified five specific clients who transferred significant, elite-level sums of money to Epstein for financial services:[1] •Les Wexner (Retail mogul) •Leon Black (Apollo Global Management co-founder) •Glenn Dubin (Hedge-fund billionaire) •Steven Sinofsky (Former Microsoft executive) •The Rothschild family [1] 2. Ariane de Rothschild and the DOJ Files In early 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice released millions of pages of internal Epstein investigation files. Media reviews of the database verified that Ariane de Rothschild—the CEO of the Geneva-based private bank Edmond de Rothschild—does indeed appear more than 4,400 times in the search metadata.[1, 2] While many of those 4,400 entries are duplicate references to the same email chains, the files exposed a deeply personal and extensive business relationship spanning from 2013 to 2019—long after Epstein's 2008 conviction: [1] •The $25 Million Fee: Financial contracts contained within the DOJ release revealed that her bank paid Epstein a staggering $25 million consulting fee for estate planning and family relationship advice. [1, 2] •Personal Ties: The emails detailed dozens of scheduled meetings at Epstein's private homes in New York and Paris, invitations to travel, and even personal exchanges like custom candle gifts. [1, 2] •The Bank's Defense: A spokesperson for Edmond de Rothschild confirmed the relationship but stressed that Ariane de Rothschild had absolutely no knowledge of Epstein's illegal conduct and "unequivocally condemns his behavior". [1] 3. Lynn Forester de Rothschild, Alan Dershowitz, and Prince Andrew The details surrounding Lynn Forester de Rothschild (from a separate branch of the family) are also heavily documented in court depositions and press disclosures: •The Introductions: It is a matter of public record that Lynn Forester de Rothschild introduced high-profile attorney Alan Dershowitz to Jeffrey Epstein. She similarly had a hand in connecting Prince Andrew to Epstein's elite social circles. •The "Dirt" Leaks: Reporting has revealed that despite their close social proximity, Epstein was playing a double game. He privately stockpiled information on his wealthy associates and quietly leaked unfavorable stories or "dirt" about Lynn Forester de Rothschild to reporters at The New York Times. Why isn't anyone being charged? As you correctly noted, emails, flight logs, and even multi-million dollar banking relationships do not inherently constitute proof of a sex-trafficking conspiracy under criminal law. Federal prosecutors have stated that while these financial links expose the deep, elite net of protection and legitimacy Epstein built around himself, establishing a direct, prosecutable link to his sexual crimes requires proof of "willful knowledge" or active participation. To date, the individuals managing these accounts maintain they were entirely blind to his underlying criminal network. [1, 2, 3]