I know you people won't rest in spreading lies and falsehoods. I won't rest too. First of all, this lady is an ignorant hypocrite. Don't fall for her. She was the one putting on a nose mask in that viral Kora debate. She did it purposely so she can continue to hide her true identity. I will be refuting the lies this ignorant hypocrite is peddling in two parts: 1. The Prophet Muhammad's ruling. 2. The lies from the Gospel of St. John. Part 1: First, the base ruling in Islam for adultery is a capital punishment. This is why the law intentionally makes the burden of proof almost impossible to meet. It requires four credible eyewitnesses who saw the physical act in plain sight. This strict condition exists because capital punishments are dropped at the slightest doubt. The law is designed to protect society from public immorality while forcing people to keep their private sins private. Islam commands believers to conceal their sins and seek forgiveness directly from God. Now let me give you a historical background of the Ghamidi woman. Nobody caught her. There was no mob dragging her through the streets. She walked into the court of Medina completely on her own and confessed. What was the immediate reaction of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him)? He turned his face away. He ignored her. As the Chief Justice, he was giving her every non-verbal cue to leave, go home, and repent in private. The Prophet was offering her a silent exit. He wanted her to take the hint, walk away, and let the matter remain a secret between her and God. But her faith in the accountability of the afterlife was so heavy that she insisted on being purified in this world.  She told him she was pregnant. Even then, the Prophet delayed the application of the law. He sent her away to deliver the baby. She came back. He sent her away again to nurse the child for years until the baby was eating solid food. Here is the hidden wisdom that these internet theologians fail to grasp. The Prophet did not send her away just for the sake of the child. He was giving her years of opportunities to change her mind. In Islamic law, a confession for such a crime can be retracted at any moment. If she had stayed home after giving birth and never returned, the Prophet would not have sent soldiers to hunt her down. He gave her a multi-year window to let her private repentance suffice and drop the case. She refused. She kept coming back because she demanded her legal purification.  This brings us to a fundamental legal principle in Islam. You are commanded to seek forgiveness and resolve matters before they reach the judge. But once a prescribed penal case officially reaches the ruler, the law must take its course. Prophet Muhammad was not just a spiritual guide giving sermons on a mountaintop. He was the Head of State and the Supreme Judge of a sovereign nation. Can a sitting judge in any functional supreme court today listen to a citizen who walks in, confesses to a capital crime, provides undeniable evidence against themselves, and demands the legal penalty, and then say, "I forgive you, go home and sin no more"? If a Chief Justice suspends the penal code based on personal emotion when a confession is forcefully submitted to the court, that is the death of justice. It becomes anarchy. The Prophet had to execute the law because the citizen demanded her constitutional right to legal purification. 1/2 🧵