Comparing 2 ETH Token Strategies $PNKSTR vs $RLBZ I wanted to research and compare 2 different strategies and share my findings. Both amazing ideas combining tokens & NFTs! The Punk Strategy is primarily used to help increase the FP of Punks, but also increases the token price with buybacks and burns. Also other tokens will be launched for other BlueChip projects, to also feed the PNKSTR machine. The RLBZ Strategy is primarily used to help increase the FP of multiple ApeChain Projects, but also incentivizes the need to hold by providing a staking solution for the swept NFTs. The more volume this token see's the more attractive NFTs it can sweep, attracting more holders. Punk Strategy $71.86M MC >10% Fee on Purchase >Purchases @cryptopunks when it has enough >Punk Automatically Listed for 1.2x >Punk is sold - Buyback token & Burn RLBZ Strategy $51k MC >5% Fee on Purchase (2% holder/3% @RugLabz ) >Purchases @ApeChainHUB projects NFTs >NFTs sent to RLBZ NFT Lucky Dip Pool >RLBZ Holders can claim randomly the NFTs in Pool >2 @apecoin Claim Service Fee. PNKSTR Contract Address @token_works 0xc50673edb3a7b94e8cad8a7d4e0cd68864e33edf RLBZ Contract Address @RugLabz 0xaef06250d07cb6389d730d0eec7d90a1549be812 Trade Responsibly | DYOR | NFA | These are my own words, no Ai was used. If incorrect, please correct in the comments.