
Paternity Fraud UK is a service for anyone who has been affected by Paternity Fraud. #paternityfraud
England, United Kingdom
Joined June 2020
- Tweets12.5K
- Following5.4K
- Followers5.9K
- Likes57.9K
Pinned Tweet
I am dedicated to helping men who have fallen victim to paternity fraud. My DM is always open to anyone who needs support.
Paternity Fraud UK retweeted
James Crossley, 38, was SLEEPING next to the child he shared with Julie McIlwaine when she stabbed him 10 TIMES in the chest.
But she walks free because she’s female.
Can't wait for the Cornell crowd to express their fury at this blatant injustice.
🤖 Made with AI
Paternity Fraud UK retweeted
Sky News and the Missing Half of the Family Court Story by Michael Thompson, Founder of the Falsely Accused Network
falselyaccusednetwork.co.uk/…
Paternity Fraud UK retweeted
This is another clear example of how easily a false accusation can destroy a life.
In 2007, 21-year-old Johnathan Montgomery was accused by his former neighbor, 17-year-old Elizabeth Coast, of sexually assaulting her seven years earlier, when she was 10 and he was 14. There was no physical evidence of any kind.
A judge convicted him on her word alone and sentenced him to 45 years, suspending all but 7½. He served roughly four years before the truth finally came out.
The Accusation:
In October 2007, Elizabeth told Hampton, Virginia, police that in late 2000, Johnathan had sexually assaulted her at her grandmother’s house across the street from where he lived. She described graphic acts. Police investigated and charged him.
There was never any physical evidence, medical findings, or independent corroboration of any kind. The case rested entirely on her testimony.
The Conviction:
Johnathan waived a jury trial.
On June 23, 2008, a judge found him guilty of forcible sodomy, aggravated sexual battery, and related charges. The court later imposed a 45-year sentence but suspended 37½ years, leaving an effective term of 7½ years.
He began serving it shortly afterward.
At sentencing, Judge Randolph T. West said: “It’s no doubt in my mind that this case was a word-against-word situation, and I hope someday if I’m not wrong — and God forbid that I’m wrong — that Mr. Montgomery tell the truth to his parents as to what occurred.”
The judge convicted and sentenced a young man to years in prison while openly acknowledging the case rested solely on one person’s word and expressing residual doubt about that word. 😡
The Recantation:
When she was 14, her parents caught her looking at pornography. To rationalize that behavior, she falsely claimed she had been sexually assaulted at age 10 by Johnathan. The lie stayed private for three years until she reported it to police at age 17, sticking to it through the trial.
In late October 2012, while working as a civilian employee of the Hampton Police Department, she came forward and admitted the entire story was a fabrication. She claimed that religion had become a bigger part of her life and that the lie was eating her up inside. She stated clearly that nothing sexual had ever happened between them.
On November 9, 2012, she was arrested for perjury and immediately fired from her police job. She pleaded guilty on May 21, 2013.
On August 19, 2013, she was sentenced to five years with all but 60 days suspended and ordered to pay Johnathan $90,000 in restitution.
For destroying four years of a man’s life with a complete fabrication, she was required to serve only 60 days. The court even allowed her to serve those days on consecutive weekends so she could keep working. The system went out of its way to accommodate the person who had lied under oath and ruined an innocent man’s life.
Exoneration:
Even with a full recantation, Virginia law at the time made immediate release difficult. On November 20, 2012, Governor Bob McDonnell granted Johnathan a conditional pardon so he could be freed while pursuing a formal writ of actual innocence.
On December 20, 2013, the Virginia Court of Appeals granted the writ, vacating the convictions and removing him from the sex-offender registry.
Aftermath:
On February 20, 2015, the Virginia legislature passed a bill awarding him $175,440 in compensation.
Four years of a man’s life were taken from him because a 14-year-old girl, after being caught looking at pornography by her parents, decided to invent a childhood sexual assault to explain it.
The system accepted a pure word-against-word claim with zero physical evidence, ignored the judge’s own residual doubt at sentencing, and only corrected the injustice after the accuser finally chose to tell the truth years later.
Even then, it took a gubernatorial pardon and a formal writ of actual innocence to clear his name.
Paternity Fraud UK retweeted
Remembering this TV Gold. When a false allegation against Ryan Thomas happened in Big Brother. I felt for him immensely as it could have ruined his life and career in TV had the camera not caught the scene where he did nothing wrong.
But, I was pleased because it highlighted what so many men go through yet don't get the justice of the cameras and their lives are ruined.
She's pissed off into oblivion never to be seen again. Good. He went onto win big brother. Good and what really pleased me was the public support for him. But her lies were quite unbelievable. So brazenly playing the victim card. If it does actually ever happen to her, she will never be believed. Can't say I'd be sorry.
Paternity Fraud UK retweeted
Women have more laws protecting their rights to kill children than fathers do to parent them.
Read that again. 🤔
Paternity Fraud UK retweeted
Why False Allegations Are So Hard to Disprove
@shrink4men
Dr Tara Palmatier explains in this excellent video
youtu.be/dojVF61iEv8?is=Oq3Z…
Paternity Fraud UK retweeted
I cannot stress how much @shrink4men helped me when I was going through my troubles.
I strongly recommend every man who has been abused by a female to watch these videos.
Paternity Fraud UK retweeted
"If men are being abused, why dont they report it?"
These comments are exactly why. A man blaming the man for being abused and women framing it as "reactive abuse" to claim he was actually the abuser as she was the victim
Even with evidence, men arent believed
A woman is extremely violent towards man, physically hits him with her hands and throws multiple chairs at him with their young daughter in close proximity. He makes her aware of this but still the chairs continue to be thrown rising inuring her.
If a man had done this exact thing to a mother whose daughter was at risk of unity. should he be arrested, charged and jailed and for how long?
If you answered ‘yes’, the why then do women men not receive the same treatment by the criminal justice system and societal judgment?
And what do the top comments say…
“The man is at fault, the abuse is reactive”.
This perfectly frames the domestic abuse industry, its egregious double standards and the enormous challenges male domestic abuse victims have when trying to seek support.
Paternity Fraud UK retweeted
Why do feminists and domestic violence charities never call out abusive women?
It’s almost as if the DV industry is corrupt and politically motivated for financial gain…
#thebachelorette
Paternity Fraud UK retweeted
Another false accuser jailed.
False Allegations aren't rare. They're rife !
dailymail.co.uk/news/article…
Paternity Fraud UK retweeted
Another false accuser jailed !
False allegations of domestic abuse aren't rare.
Getting false accusers prosecuted is rare !
bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c78x…
Paternity Fraud UK retweeted
🚨 Justice for All – Panel Discussion Announcement 🚨
We’re pleased to confirm the final line-up for the upcoming Justice for All discussion programme from the Falsely Accused Network.
Filming takes place on Saturday 14 March, with the episode being released on our channels shortly afterwards.
Joining the panel:
• Reza Pashazadeh – Midtown Law (Criminal Defence)
• Shak Inayat – Penn Chambers (Family Law)
• Zarah Mahoboob – Alta Law (Family & Immigration Law)
Together we’ll be discussing three major issues currently generating debate within the justice system:
🔹 The Rachael Jones false rape allegation case and the wider issue of false allegations.
🔹 Allegations of immigration fraud and “spousal visa scams” raised in relationship disputes.
🔹 The Government’s proposal to repeal the presumption of parental involvement in the family courts.
This will be an open and honest discussion about how criminal law, family law and immigration law intersect in some of the most difficult cases facing the justice system today.
We’re looking forward to a thoughtful and robust conversation with our panel.
🎥 Recording: Saturday 14 March
📺 Release: Coming soon on our channels
Follow for updates and the full episode.
#JusticeForAll #FamilyLaw #CriminalLaw #ImmigrationLaw

















