Not every question is asked in good faith. “Sea-lioning” uses endless, seemingly sincere questions to wear someone down and make them look unreasonable for getting frustrated.
Fathers are supposed to protect their sons.
But why do we make permanent decisions about their bodies before they can even say no?
Tradition isn't consent. And love should include protecting a child's right to choose.
Agree or disagree?
Disagreement can sharpen a debate. But when criticism turns into misleading claims and low-effort trolling, it stops being an audit and starts undermining trust.
They brought attention to men’s issues—but attention isn’t the same as progress. Equality means equal rights, protection, and a voice, not a return to old power dynamics.
POTS was accused of changing context of a statement in a interview by releasing a short video of it. The full interview is evidence that the short video does not change the context.
When fairness feels one-sided, some men choose to walk away. The challenge is protecting everyone while making sure accusations are handled fairly and due process applies to all.
Fathers' rights and intactivism are interconnected pieces of a larger movement. True progress comes from uniting under the umbrella of men's equality, where shared standards and rights strengthen every individual cause.
Let's have an honest conversation about circumcision.
Not insults. Not censorship. Not “because I said so.”
Let's examine the medical evidence, discuss the risks, and put children's interests first.
What's the strongest argument FOR infant circumcision and do you think the evidence supports it?
It is becoming increasingly difficult to distinguish AI-led interviews from human ones. People often donate without verifying the source or methodology. Always look closer at the information you consume.
True advocacy isn't a gamble—it's an investment in education. Funding awareness efforts creates tangible results, reaching thousands of parents and shifting perspectives. When the work is based on facts, the return is measurable, not a lottery.
Circumcision is described as genital mutilation, a non-natural practice rooted in the idea that sex is dirty. The procedure removes sensitive skin and nerves from the penis, aimed at desensitizing it.
Claims of immediate FDA or EMA approval for human trials are misleading. The shift to recellularization creates an entirely new product, necessitating fresh animal trials before human testing can even be considered. The timeline simply does not add up.
Michigan's Licensing Agency is Protecting FGM? | Does Being Circumcised Lead to Divorce? | Foregen Fundraiser
Claims that clinical trials are imminent ignore the reality of the research timeline. With a shift to recellularization, the company is effectively restarting animal testing. Transparency matters when discussing medical advancements.
Born perfect.
Then adults decide he needs to be “fixed.”
Healthy tissue removed.
No consent possible.
No way to undo it.
A child’s body is not a customization project.
Celebrities swear by a 'secret' ingredient for youthful skin: foreskin facials. Extracted from circumcised babies, these treatments claim to boost collagen via microneedling. A surprising trend with a high price tag.
FOLLOW THE EVIDENCE. QUESTION THE CONFLICTS.
Who funded it?
Who authored it?
Who rated the studies?
Were competing findings fairly evaluated?
When it comes to circumcision, don't accept conclusions on authority alone.
Read critically. Ask questions. Demand transparency.
He never got a vote.
He never gave consent.
He has to live with the decision.
Why is a boy’s bodily autonomy treated as optional?






