Sark may be about to lose me with this one. I thought we could overcome some of those deficiencies and stubborn tendencies. I'm no longer convinced.
Texas without a pass rush is very beatable at the corners. Getting exposed by a first-time starter today.
And we're bck to three yards and a cloud of dust. It's like Sark said "OK guys, that's what you wanted. Happy now?" And went right back to the old script.
Just for clarification, Talarico would also be the first to explain to you that our understanding of LGBTQ is much deeper now than it was at the time, and we can't take condemnation of that lifestyle and apply it today, because we know more than they did back then." But with abortion, "Hey, they didn't think unborn babies were living people, so who are we to argue with that?"
I don't want to hear anything about how atheists are just as capable (or more) of morality and valuing human life as believers in God. Although believers unwilling to save the person made in God's image is pretty scary as well.
A person willingly enters a tiger enclosure and approaches the tiger. The tiger begins mauling the person. You have a gun and the ability to take a clean shot at the tiger to save the person's life.
Q1: What do you do?
Q2: Do you consider yourself religious? (Yes/No)
23%Shoot | Yes
17%Shoot | No
22%Don't shoot | Yes
38%Don't shoot | No
20,995 votes • Final resultsThis is the great fallacy of "once-saved always saved." It assumes that sinning, asking for forgiveness and receiving mercy through the blood of Christ is "keeping myself saved."
No one who has been saved who desires to remain saved and is willing to continue repenting of sin and remaining faithful in his allegiance to Christ will be lost. But that person still has free will, and Christians are constantly warned to be vigilant and "work out their own salvation with fear and trembling."
There is nothing in scripture that says I cannot wilfully leave the Lord. In fact, that is the pattern of scripture throughout.
Replying to @Omiron33
It must suck to live in constant fear that Christ won’t keep you saved. 😬 Romans 8:30 says those God justified, He also glorified. Your assurance rests on His faithfulness, not your ability to keep yourself saved.
If you reject Catholicism because it distorts the pattern of God's church into something that elevates men and creates rituals and ceremonies from which Christ already freed us...
And if you reject Protestantism because you reject the unbiblical concepts of faith apart from obedience and the utter confusion introduced by thousands of different denominations and creeds that exalt doctrine over scripture. What are you left with?
You're left with just being a Christian. Follow God's word. It's not complicated. Repent of your sin (2 Peter 3:9). Confess Jesus as Lord and give him your allegiance (Romans 10:10). Be baptized in the name of Jesus for the forgiveness of your sins (Acts 2:38). Conform yourself to the image of Christ (Romans 12:1-2) and live by faith that he will forgive you when you fall short and confess your sin to him (1 John 1:9). Be a blessing to the body of Christ as part of a local congregation of believers (Eph. 4:15-16). Show your faith by bearing fruit that Christ has called you to produce (2 Peter 1:5-11).
It's not complicated. It costs you nothing, and it costs you everything. And it's worth it.
Paul Hammons retweeted
Okay……I’m going to vent, so thank you in advance for sticking around. This is why I feel so strongly about the A’ja Wilson/fan incident.
In sports, there’s always been this unspoken agreement between away players and home fans. It’s a huge part of what has made sports great!!
I think back to Magic Johnson laughing while telling a story about a fan in the 1980s at the Boston airport. He snarled as he recalled him saying, “Larry Bird is gonna kill you.” I remember smiling when I heard this because we all can relate. Even if we weren’t the type to say this, maybe we’ve had a family member who might’ve done this. After all, fan is short for “fanatic”.
Then in the NFL, you had the Dawg Pound, or even the famous wall in Green Bay. There are legendary stories we’ve heard from Hall of Fame players about how intimidating it was to play in these venues.
I’m not talking about slurs or abusive behavior, either. There have always been outliers among fans who cross that line, but we (the other 99% of fans) have always condemned that. The agreement was: “If you come here to play, we are going to make it extremely hard for you to win.” The player knew this, so they prepared accordingly and brought their A-game. The pretenders choked, while the others became legends.
Fans might boo, or yes, even point while saying, “That foul is on you.” That isn’t hate or disrespect…… it’s competition! Despite our differences, this was ALWAYS what brought us together in sports.
So somehow we went from the “sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me” generation into a time where former WNBA players, now in the media, are saying things like “she won’t tolerate the disrespect” or “don’t play with A’ja, she is tough.”
Maybe that’s it — we need to redefine what toughness is. Because losing control of your emotions and getting in the face of a fan (who was one of the hundreds pointing and saying “that’s on you”) isn’t tough. That makes you soft, thin-skinned, easily rattled, etc. Cussing out a fan when you know there’s a 0% chance of anything physical happening isn’t bold, courageous, or tough. It’s a waste of time.
Toughness is letting your game do the talking. Let those fans motivate you to reach levels in your game you didn’t know were possible. Besides, what’s tough about saying words? Maybe you hurt someone’s feelings? Oh no, not that……. — so for me, “A’ja don’t play” simply means she threw a hissy fit. That’s no different than a toddler who has not yet learned to cope with minor inconveniences. We don’t label them tough, nor should we do the same with A’ja.
So finally, if you enjoy the personal attacks or being offended, great, it’s a free country. Just know that if you continue down this path, you will ruin sports — one of the last things that brought us all together.
Thanks for reading my book.
Paul Hammons retweeted
Replying to @TodAshby
If I were having a conversation with someone whose priority in life is to become wealthy, and I told him that money doesn't make me happy, and that the best things in life are family and fellowship in Christ, he would call me a fool. He would have no understanding of what I'm talking about and no interest in pursuing those other things, because they don't line up with how he sees the world. He is incapable of understanding what I'm saying.
That does NOT mean that he will ALWAYS be incapable. People change. People who are absolutely set in their ways will find their perspetive changed either by time, or by something in their lives that change their perspective.
A person who is adamantly pro-choice cannot understand the arguments for saving an unborn child. But there are many pro-life advocates that used to be pro-choice until they saw a video, or experienced childbirth or went through some other event that changed their perspective. That's what Paul is talking about with the natural man - until his perspective is changed, until he actually sees value in spiritual things, he has no interest in them, because they do nothing for him that he desires.
That's not about free will or ability. It's just how humans work. That's why we pray for people who are in rebellion to God to undergo something in their lives that will change how they see themselves and how they see the world. That's when that person becomes receptive to the gospel.
Paul Hammons retweeted
Replying to @DanielvsBabylon
As it turns out, the Greeks often used agapao and phileo interchangeably, and in fact passages in scripture do as well. (Compare the Greek in Matthew 23:6 and Luke 11:43, John 5:20 and 3:35, and note how John uses agape in John 3:19 and 12:43.) I think this makes more of this passage than is intended.
Here's a good example: 1 Cor. 16:22–24:
22 If anyone has no love (φιλέω - phileo) for the Lord, let him be accursed. Our Lord, come! 23 The grace of the Lord Jesus be with you. 24 My love (ἀγάπη agape) be with you all in Christ Jesus. Amen.
Phileo is not an inferior form of love. It is commanded just as agape is - and the distinction is likely not as strong as often make it.
Paul Hammons retweeted
Justin Verlander walks off the mound at Comerica Park for the final time.
This is exactly where it was supposed to end. ❤️😭









