When Candace Owens first began questioning the mainstream narrative about the Charlie Kirk assassination I, admittedly, thought she was distracting from the truth about what happened him. I listened to JD Vance and Stephen Miller on the Charlie Kirk show the week after talk about how these radical leftwing NGO groups are inciting and planning violence on conservatives. Could a radical leftwing group, like Armed Queers SLC have radicalized Tyler Robinson and coordinated and planned the attack? There was a decoy in the crowd, Tyler Robinson seems to have been coordinating with cars after the shot was taken, there was chatter online before the assassination, etc. I am still not completely closed off to the possibility that a leftwing group was responsible. I emphasize group. The "lone wolf" narrative seems very unlikely. However, another group that had the motive and means to take out Charlie Kirk was the military industrial complex within the Zionist government of Israel, and this is where I was wrong about Candace Owens... Candace questioned immediately the behavior of Bibi Netanyahu within 48 hours of Charlie being killed. Bibi went on Fox News within 24 hours to issue condolences and say that Charlie was a never wavering friend of Israel. Within 48 hours, Bibi was denying that Israel was involved in the assassination. Candace then revealed the pressure, threats, and moral blackmail Charlie was receiving from his Zionist donors and friends over his shifting views on Israel, and his refusal to remove Tucker Carlson, who they considered "the most dangerous antisemite in America" from TPUSA events. Candace then revealed what happened at the Hamptons Meeting wherein Charlie was bullied over his shifting views and Tucker Carlson. Finally, Candace Owens revealed the text messages of Charlie saying that "because of the stereotypical behavior of Jewish donors... he had no choice but to leave the Pro-Israel cause." What is interesting about this bombshell text message thread was that these same Zionist donors and friends accused Candace of making them up. Only to have Andrew Kolvet confirm they were from his own phone, and he submitted them to the authorities after Charlie was killed because he believed them to be relevant evidence! Andrew Kolvet, along with a few others, received messages from Charlie saying that he was afraid for his life. Andrew clearly was concerned that Charlie's shifting views might've played a role in his death. Truth seekers of good faith are allowed to be concerned about the same. Why were Charlie Kirks shifting views and support of Israel such a big deal? Charlie had proven himself to be a powerful political force. He and TPUSA had just run the ground game and flipped the 2024 election in President Trump's favor. Charlie had his pulse on the finger of young people in America more so than any other person. He had the ear of President Trump, and prevented the US from engaging in a regime change war with Iran the summer before he was killed. He was perhaps the most influential figure for the people in America. He was the lynchpin of the Right. Imagine, if he was no longer going to use his influence and platform to advocate for US aid and support of Israel? Bibi Netanyahu and Israel have said that they have an existential requirement to win the information war in America. Israel is recruiting Christian pastors and churches across America to fight "misinformation about Israel" amongst young people in America. Who has the largest network of Evangelical Christian churches in America? TPUSA. Bibi Netanyahu has said that social media is a weapon of modern warfare. Bibi wanted and needed Charlie to advocate for Israel, and Charlie refused. In fact, he was advising President Trump to defy Bibi Netanyahu's wishes. What would a country be willing to do for survival? Governments do terrible things... We must be asking these questions. Finally, we would have never even know about any of these things if not for Candace Owens. She put herself out there to reveal it all, and they have lied about her every step of the way. It started with Eric Bolling on the Patrick Bet David podcast saying that Candace hadn't been invited to TPUSA events for years and that Charlie had a silent break up with her. Both of these were verified to be false, even though a guy like Dave Rubin reposted Eric Bolling vouching for it. Once I saw the lies and unfair attacks on Candace Owens for revealing true things about what was happening to Charlie my perspective started to change. What we witnessed was the same Zionist lobby who were attacking Charlie Kirk in the last months of his life, lying and slandering Candace Owens for speaking up about it. Then Megyn Kelly did too, and look at what they are doing to her. It is truly insane and eye opening. All of that to be said, I am open minded about which group was involved in the assassination of Charlie Kirk. I just want to know the truth, and I know many people do. We have no problem questioning our own American government, why can't we do the same of a foreign nation? After all that we've been through we are just supposed to trust governments now? We know that governments and the elite will do evil things to get their way. This is the way of the world. It is naive to think otherwise, and imprudent to not question what we are being told. If we don't have the truth, we have nothing.