Been using Herdr lately to manage my agent sessions and really enjoying it. There's still more work to be done to have better integration with jj, however it has excellent hooks with all agent harnesses.
Highly recommend! Next on the list is to try out Collie to prompt remotely.
GPT 5.4 has a much better ability to delegate work to sub-agents compared to GPT 5.3.
Even within OpenCode, which has not been tuned for subagents as much as Codex has (now), GPT 5.4 is able to delegate work even at the planning stage! This is sometihng GPT 5.3 would never do.
Trying out new code review tools lately! On my list is using `jj`, from ben.gesoff.uk/posts/reviewin…. I'm particularly interested in comparing to a native Git approach of walking commit-by-commit and taking notes, then using an LLM to post the notes correctly on GitHub.
Related, but I am excited for GitHub to have an early preview of a native Stacked PR flow.
Until then, I've been following davepacheco.net/blog/2025/st… which appears to have been a pretty good approach to help coworkers review my code.
Tried out Cursor and the updated Gemini 2.5 Pro model today. Overall so far Claude Code seems to work out-the-box better.
Gemini 2.5 Pro experience with Cursor is not perfect -- using wrong file extensions and missing out on files included in the context.
I tried Cursor for another day (in agent mode), and overall it was a net negative. The agent mode fired off too fast and left me no time to evaluate each step. Although I spent substantial time creating a detailed plan of implementation and finding relevant context, the model
oops accidentally deleted everything with git, thank you vscode for having a local history of everything
One of my first (proper) luau user-defined type functions -- a readonly<T> type which accepts a table/union/intersection type and spits back a readonly form.
Useful now that a table.freeze call will return the same type (hopefully) as the output of this type
Been using Claude Code lately -- code output is quite good, but it's expensive (relative to other LLM tools). Would definitely exceed the cost of a Cursor subscription.
My late night thought is that this is a great tool for finding dead code / duplicate code across a codebase.
Claude Code is decently good at finding relevant files / code to get enough context before it tries to code.
Asking the model to look around more or at a specific place also tends to lead to a good result. Overall, been an interesting experience!






