One key concept is Laughtivism — using humour, satire and ridicule to undermine authority, attract attention and mobilise people. It is a deliberate tactic. Nonviolent framing does not guarantee a movement stays nonviolent.

This is the story @chapter1mag_com investigated when CJP first appeared. From Serbia to Jantar Mantar, @ashu_nauty examined the striking similarities in methods and the possible routes by which a global nonviolent-resistance model reached Indian streets. At the centre: #CANVAS.

Delhi High Court just asked CJP’s Saurav Das & Ashutosh Ranka point-blank: “Who are you? What organisation? What’s its purpose when public order is at stake?” They withdrew the petition. This isn’t a Gen Z story. It’s a global playbook. Thread 🧵

Watch @ashu_nauty ’s full 'Chapter 1' investigation. Follow the chronology. Examine the evidence. Decide for yourself.

1960: License Raj drove away Fairchild and Intel 1970: Semiconductor lab approval delayed 1980: Metkem was denied affordable power 2005: Intel was refused government incentives How India missed the semiconductor opportunity every single time for sixty years? @arpit_awadhi