I am here to learn & contribute in ways that bring about positive change, & thankful for all those sharing truth. We will make the world a better place! šŸŒŽšŸ™šŸ¼

Joined November 2024
Replying to @idontexistTore
Thank you—no more "influencers" distracting from real issues. Secure paper ballots Same day vote/count Secure mail-in vote accountability Hand count and livestream the count Verifiable vote count Voter ID NO EARLY VOTING NO MACHINE COUNTS (unverifiable) NO ELECTRONIC POLLBOOKS
4
1
18
394
OnlyPaperBallots retweeted
That YUAN in Europe is funding all the protests. They let them buy their seat in the UN now they have to lie in that. We need to defund the UN to let them really feel the heat since they can’t see it.
9
202
10
420
8,102
Preview: Today at 11 AM ET, @FLOTUS and @POTUS sign historic new executive order ā€œAdvancing Women’s Health to Improve Outcomes in All Phases of Life.ā€
140
318
18
1,341
56,087
OnlyPaperBallots retweeted
3
34
458
5,283
OnlyPaperBallots retweeted
.@SecretaryWright: "Russia exports, today, zero diesel. This is an incentive to Russia that if they can reduce the conflict with Ukraine — if they can get an energy ceasefire or reduce the conflict such that they have diesel to export — we'll allow it to flow to world markets. This is a carrot to try to end a war; it's not an economic lifeline for Russia."
383
485
45
2,367
148,243
OnlyPaperBallots retweeted
Secretary @SecScottBessent. Director @FBIDirectorKash. @HSBC paid $1.92 billion. No one went to jail. I was the whistleblower. 14 years later, @BankofAmerica admits it willfully broke the law, pays $1.2 billion, and no one goes to jail. 3.6 million Americans read my letter. You haven’t responded. So I’m asking on camera: who is going to be charged?
344
5,282
192
11,338
120,035
OnlyPaperBallots retweeted
Wray of Light Be Careful What You Wish For
When @idontexistTore articles come to life years later. As Tore has recently said (even over IRS filings) these things take time! Listen to OUR PRESIDENT, then look to Tore’s articles. toresays.com/2021/06/17/high…
1
31
1
54
769
OnlyPaperBallots retweeted
It sounds like you shouldn’t have a problem doing the exact same thing for @idontexistTore like she requested then since you obviously have shown that you know how to do this now. You really need to do that and apologize to her too.
I am issuing a correction now , and will be taking the post down in a bit after I make sure everybody sees it. I jumped the gun and I apologize. I’ve heard too many people use similar-sounding language, but Peter didn’t actually say what I initially thought he did. I have spent years watching people on podcasts making claims of ā€˜I have a federal source that told me this’, ā€˜I have a source inside the FBI!’ etc. etc. and they make it sound like they’re getting a leak. And if the claim were real, that would be a criminal leak. A federal felony. I’ve been watching people do that since 2017. There’s rarely any pushback on it. It’s especially bad right now in what I refer to as ā€˜Podcastistan’, where all the ā€˜formers’ are the making the rounds, [ā€˜former’ CIA agents/assets and ā€˜former’ FBI agents/informants], talking about what all their friends and sources still ā€˜on the inside’ are supposedly telling them on the down low. Leaking to them, actually. Shit like, ā€œOh hey, my cool federal inside sources at DOJ/FBI just confirmed to me yet AGAIN that Todd Blanche has SHUT DOWN the Ft. Pierce grand jury investigations! And now I’m going on every podcast I can get onto and telling everybody what my anonymous federal sources have been sharing with me lately!ā€ Yeah, anonymously sourced shit like that. It’s everywhere, and I watch people just swallow it without questioning it. It’s too fucking dumb for words. I’ve called many people out for doing this on podcasts in the past couple of years, but I admit I got this one very wrong. Peter was not actually claiming he had an anonymous source inside the FBI telling him things on the sly, and he was ā€˜sharing that’ on the podcast. Other very prominent people in the election integrity movement are doing that, but Peter is not one of them. I regret the error and I will do better.
3
2
60
āš ļøWarning for those who may be victims of ActBlue fraud: Be careful before emailing Mark Finchem’s Election Fairness Institute (EFI)āš ļø The post below (from Shawn Taylor / @FTGSolutionsLLC) tells people who find their name on FEC.gov to immediately email [email protected]. It says ā€œattorneys are reviewing these casesā€ and implies you may be able to join a potential class action. That kind of ā€œpotentialā€ / ā€œattorneys are reviewingā€ language is a hedge. There is no public lawsuit, no filed complaint, and no published number of people who have actually contacted them. Public records on EFI (Mark Finchem’s organization) raise concerns about what happens to your information: EFI’s own 2025 Form 990 (signed by Finchem) reports $243,614 in salaries plus payroll taxes, yet lists 0 employees and $0 paid to Finchem or any board members. Actual program spending was only $3,408 out of roughly $359,000 total expenses. In 2024 they paid about 52 cents of every donated dollar to a professional fundraiser (Eberle Associates, listed on Minnesota’s charity registry). Their donor list has been offered for rent (around $125 per thousand names). Checking FEC.gov yourself is free and public. Sending your name, state, and details to this group is optional and not necessary. The filings show heavy fundraising and list activity with almost no reported program spending and no employees. Full paper trail (from EFI’s own filings): Part 1 (The Charity That Pays No One): toresays.substack.com/p/file… Part 2 (Fifty Cents on the Dollar): toresays.substack.com/p/the-… (Part 2 is also available at toresays.com/2026/09/18/finc…) Do your own homework before sharing your personal info. CC: @CFWBers @johnrich @POTUS @realDonaldTrump your names were ones of many tagged in this post and I have a concern that this 'could' be an attempt to create proximity to you for clout and or association. FYI: @atensnut
4
65
1
69
2,037
OnlyPaperBallots retweeted
Barrack Hussein Obama, our nation’s first Muslim president, comes to the defense of jihadist Somali Congresswoman Ilhan Omar.
It is a basic principle of American democracy that the government can’t selectively target individuals simply because of their political beliefs or what they say. But that’s exactly what the Trump Administration is doing to Congresswoman Ilhan Omar of Minnesota. To understand why this is so appalling, it’s important to know the facts. Congresswoman Omar came to this country with her father when she was 12 years old. Five years later, her father became a naturalized citizen. If Ilhan had been 18 at the time, she would have had to apply for citizenship separately. But because she was 17, she became a naturalized citizen automatically. Congresswoman Omar went on to graduate from college, work as a community organizer, become the first Somali-American legislator elected to public office in the U.S., and win a seat in Congress. There, she has been one of the Trump Administration’s fiercest critics, which has led the president to repeatedly single her out as someone who he believes does not belong in this country. Now the Administration is actively trying to deport Congresswoman Omar, seemingly based solely on the unsubstantiated theory that she was actually 18 when her father was naturalized, and therefore is not a citizen. Federal agents have raided her home, confiscated personal records, and seized her phone — all to try and uncover a nonexistent smoking gun from 20 years ago that will somehow make their case. Think about that. The full weight of the federal government is being brought down on a law-abiding elected official because she has dared to criticize the president. And it’s not the first time this has happened. Under President Trump, the Justice Department has repeatedly gone after those he considers his political enemies — from the Attorney General of New York, to the former head of the FBI, to members of the Federal Reserve. In those cases, the prosecutions either stalled or were dismissed for having no basis in law, and the same is likely to happen in this case. But not before Congresswoman Omar’s life has been turned upside down, her legal bills have piled up, and she’s been forced to spend time fighting unsubstantiated charges instead of serving the people of Minnesota. The fact that any president, or any administration, is willing to engage in such transparent efforts to intimidate someone should outrage all Americans, regardless of how they feel about Congresswoman Omar’s political views. Because if this becomes the new normal, there’s no reason to believe it will stop with her — or that future presidents, in either party, won’t do the same.
1,194
2,704
120
17,232
230,371
OnlyPaperBallots retweeted
New Investigative Series Superintelligence -To infinity and beyond!
26
122
5
239
6,384
This is what @jamestalarico and his buddies want too. Never forget.
Sen. Elissa Slotkin just said that he wants to prosecute everyone who works for President Trump and that her goal is for young conservatives coming out of school to be afraid of working in a Republican administration
15
62
3
156
1,578
OnlyPaperBallots retweeted
A 30 percent vitamin C solution dissolved in DMSO cleared 86 percent of basal cell skin cancer lesions within eight weeks in a clinical trial. In a randomized study published in Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, researchers tested a topical mix of high-concentration ascorbic acid and dimethyl sulfoxide, a solvent that helps substances penetrate deeply into the skin. Applied twice daily for eight weeks, the combination produced complete clearance in 13 of 15 lesions (86.7 percent) among patients with low-risk basal cell carcinoma. This rate exceeded that of the standard topical treatment imiquimod, which cleared 8 of 14 lesions (57.1 percent). The vitamin C–DMSO formulation also caused fewer side effects and avoided the lasting skin hypopigmentation sometimes seen with conventional topical therapies. Because basal cell carcinoma is the most common form of skin cancer worldwide, these early results suggest a possible low-cost, non-invasive option. Larger trials are still required before the approach can be adopted as standard care. [Burke, B., & Bailie, J.-E. (2022). Randomized trial of topical ascorbic acid in DMSO versus imiquimod for the treatment of basal cell carcinoma. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 148, 112710. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.112710]
130
2,096
97
8,003
303,932
OnlyPaperBallots retweeted
4
42
448
8,075
OnlyPaperBallots retweeted
Replying to @idontexistTore
Lin Wood posted this on TG.
1
21
2
58
1,810
OnlyPaperBallots retweeted
Replying to @OnlyPaperBallot
Nothing can stop what's coming.
1
1
5
It's deeply troubling to have seen how some in our groups turned community spaces into personal gain arenas. Instead of fostering collaboration, we've witnessed many chase fame, prioritize self-interest, and seek profit over helping others. Some have cunningly leveraged their closeness to the heart of our community for personal gain, operating in the shadows where their actions go unnoticed. They exploit the trust and access they've gained not to uplift the community but to advance their own interests, quietly siphoning off the goodwill and resources meant for all. In these supposed havens for support and growth, genuine helpers are often ridiculed or defamed by those seeking to elevate themselves. This isn't just disappointing; it's harmful. When altruism is overshadowed, we lose the community's heart and its potential for positive development. The irony is clear: these self-serving acts are masked as community participation. True community members uplift each other, not step on them. The pursuit of recognition has blurred the line between real connection and self-promotion. Even worse, some infiltrate our groups to exploit our data. These individuals, no better than influencers who worsen the problems they claim to solve, betray our trust, turning our groups into data markets. We must reflect on why we're here. Is it for mutual support and sharing knowledge, or just to serve someone's ego or wallet? The real tragedy is our silent acceptance of these dynamics. By not challenging them, we're complicit in undermining what makes our communities valuable – the chance for genuine human connections and collective advancement. Value those who speak truth and help without expecting anything back, creating a community where kindness, not clout, is the goal to ensure the pursuit of knowledge and that empathy isn't overshadowed by ambition or data trading. Isn't it time we redefined success in our groups? Where the true win is everyone's empowerment, not individual accolades? Committing to a community where integrity and collective strength are paramount.
33
163
11
509
13,315
SIGNIFICANT RETRACTION - FRAUD @SecKennedy @POTUS @VP Retraction of the Research Article - SARS-CoV-2 S2–targeted vaccination elicits broadly neutralizing antibodies "data fabrication casts doubt on some other experiments presented in the paper," science.org/doi/10.1126/scit…
1
59
OnlyPaperBallots retweeted
šŸ‘€These are photos of females not rooms @FBI
7
7
111
This is more than a narrative; it’s an invitation to question, to uncover, and to wrestle with the unsettling truths hidden in plain sight. What you choose to believe is up to you. Fact, fiction, or that disquieting space where they overlap—the decision is yours.
6
13
120