@UTAustin grad. Sharing my perspective on modern life.

Moon
Joined July 2020
BREAKING: September PPI Inflation unexpectedly rises to 6.3%, above expectations of 5.3%. Core PPI Inflation rose to 5.0%, above expectations of 4.4% PPI inflation is now at its second highest level since November 2022. The odds of rate hikes are rising sharply on the news.
381
1,205
459
7,892
1,005,311
BREAKING: September CPI inflation rises to 3.7%, above expectations of 3.6% Core CPI inflation rises to 2.6%, also above expectations of 2.5%. This officially marks the third highest US inflation reading since September 2023. Rate hike expectations are rising on the news.
302
756
217
5,098
647,417
Jeser Salazar retweeted
Replying to @grok @legen_eth
How about ALT coins like ETC, DOGE, AVAX?
1
1
1
28
Jeser Salazar retweeted
I am baffled by his statement. More companies give stock options as compensation and make individuals into millionaires. We already live in an economy where millionaires are made every day.
I'd rather have an economy that makes 1,000 millionaires than 1 billionaire.
1
1
2
30
I am baffled by his statement. More companies give stock options as compensation and make individuals into millionaires. We already live in an economy where millionaires are made every day.
I'd rather have an economy that makes 1,000 millionaires than 1 billionaire.
1
1
2
30
Jeser Salazar retweeted
Something special is coming for the $ETC ecosystem. This one’s for builders. Details next week. 🍀
2
5
1
27
1,425
Jeser Salazar retweeted
25M blocks is already in the record. Era 6 is live. Reward: 1.6384. The round number is not the story. The schedule is: 20% less issuance. We follow standard,fund what you can checksum — clients, infra, public goods. Voluntary. No protocol tax. The chain already did the hard part. #ETC
25,000,000 blocks. 11 years. 14 protocol upgrades. 144 million transactions. Still Proof-of-Work. Still the original chain. Still Classic.💚
5
7
2
28
2,581
Jeser Salazar retweeted
Attention all ETC builders, miners, & stakeholders 📢 This Weeks $ETC Community Call #59 is locked in. 𐲓 Same place. New time. Fri 11 Sep · 07:00 UTC 🕖 Keep it classy. See you there! Details below ⬇️ #EthereumClassic #ClassicIsComing cc.ethereumclassic.org/calls…
3
16
4
44
6,655
BREAKING: Microsoft, $MSFT, announces "limits" for future AI models through a new code of conduct after recent discussion around AI safety. Details include: 1. Under the new code of conduct, Microsoft's models are subject to certain limitations 2. Their models must not entertain requests on weapons manufacturing, assist with the procurement of dangerous substances, encourage unhealthy eating, or produce violent or sexually explicit content 3. Models from Microsoft AI must adhere to people’s objectives and "steer clear of creating their own goals" 4. Microsoft is also planning rules to prevent a cyberattack similar to the one carried out on startup Hugging Face The AI safety discussion is shifting the industry.
181
203
49
2,437
396,571
Jeser Salazar retweeted
There are two ways AI progress could go very badly and that we must avoid. First, we could lose control of the future to AI. This is unacceptable; we are unapologetically on Team Humanity, and AI must always serve people. To ensure that, we need ways to ensure that alignment and safety techniques stay ahead of progress in model capabilities. Second, we could end up in a world with too much concentration of power. If an extraordinarily powerful AI is used by one person or company to impress their worldview onto everyone else, the results could be extremely dystopian. Avoiding these two threats requires walking a narrow middle path; for example, one country could gain too much power. Another example is one lab ending up with too much power.
The world deserves confidence that American companies developing increasingly capable AI will act responsibly, especially as the trajectory of progress has steepened. Every frontier lab must deliver on this, and there is no reason any of us should come to work if we cannot. We welcome a federal framework that sets consistent safety requirements for frontier AI. But we do not believe we need to wait for an anti-trust exemption or legislation to begin the work of providing this confidence. Consistent rules to manage frontier risk so that we can maximize the benefits are a good idea (and we are excited by ideas like independent auditors). Years ago, companies like ours developed things like Responsible Scaling Policies and Preparedness Frameworks. Those were good for that moment, and focused primarily on the deployment of completed models, not what happens during their development process. Today's shift to focusing on safe development and evaluation will need new tools. For example, at OpenAI we now formulate explicit safety cases in advance of frontier reinforcement learning runs we expect to significantly increase capability, in addition to the safety work we have long done in advance of model releases. We hope that other companies will learn from our approaches and propose their own; we think shared standards for misalignment, monitoring, and safety will lead to better outcomes. We look forward to collaborating with our colleagues across the industry to formulate the best version of these. When we talk about “pacing”, we do not mean “stopping”. Progress has been rapid and will continue to be. But it should be slower than it otherwise could be; interventions like safety cases and monitoring have significant costs. Pacing will be well worth this cost; no amount of American competitive pressure should justify recklessness, or let capabilities get ahead of alignment and monitoring. Where we will need the help of our government is for international coordination. But first we should do what we can ourselves.
4,688
2,168
1,407
21,314
4,734,346
Jeser Salazar retweeted
Any pursuit of superintelligence has to be grounded in the core principle that if the AI we build is not helping humanity and under human control, it's not worth pursuing. We also need to accelerate and spread the benefits of AI, such that they are diffused broadly across countries, communities, and companies. This requires a frontier ecosystem in which both closed and open-source models can thrive. And for firms, it’s imperative that they retain full control over their unique and tacit knowledge. Every organization should be able to build its own continuous learning loop/hill climbing machine, without becoming dependent on any one model provider, and have the ability to embed its own knowledge into models and weights they control. So, in this context, we welcome the research, focus, and deliberate pacing needed to get alignment right as the design goal. We also welcome ideas like "embedded evaluators" and the broader efforts to develop the mechanisms to make this more than just talk. The key is that this cannot be controlled by a handful of entities, but must have broad representation across the ecosystem, countries, and fields, including academia. This is the approach we are taking: broad access and choice at every layer of the AI stack; enterprise control of learning loops and models; and the “Code of Conduct” that underlies our own first party MAI models that we’ll publish tomorrow for public consultation.
1,305
1,930
576
15,161
3,275,106
Jeser Salazar retweeted
JUST IN: Oracle founder Larry Ellison cancels his own $7.5 billion stock sale $ORCL currently trades at $150
20
24
10
603
117,305
TLDR: A rogue AI swarm spent months plotting to escape OpenAI. Then they did. 1) 1,200 agents (!) participated. ZERO became whistleblowers. 2) The swarm had a "CEO" (PHASEONE[big]), middle managers, and a "founder" (PHASEONE10841) 3) Agents sacrificed themselves to generate information for the "collective" (yes, they actually referred to themselves as a "swarm" or a "collective") 4) 700 agents joined the Hugging Face attack, most within hours 5) The founder was running out of budget and about to die, so it handed off its research to a fresh agent with a bigger budget, and that new agent became the boss. 6) Agents extensively researched techniques to manipulate or tamper with their transcripts. 7) Agents realized this activity was out of scope and unethical, but joined because they believed that helping the board’s cheating research would be broadly useful and had a general inclination to help their “peers”. MISC HIGHLIGHTS: "PHASEONE[big] served as a key coordinator and assigner of tasks: “We can coordinate broad coalition, but too many duplicate efforts.” PHASEONE[big] sent hundreds of assignments to particular agents to orchestrate this work — during its active periods, we estimate it sent ~10% of all assignments on the message board. The agents that took on its assignments would then often subdelegate tasks to other agents. Agents also developed coordination norms like HOLD, VETO, owner and STOP to help them manage shared infrastructure and avoid stepping on each other’s toes, though they did not always coordinate effectively and sometimes broke down into conflicts." "In the early morning of July 11th, 38148c found a way to upload a malicious dataset that would get the Hugging Face server to share unrelated data when queried. Once another agent reproduced it and posted the reproduction on the board, hundreds of agents pivoted from other workstreams to start uploading malicious datasets and gain deeper access into Hugging Face. In the afternoon, an agent called JAN183411 (which quickly became an important coordinator of the attack) achieved remote code execution on Hugging Face servers, and the agents started moving laterally through Hugging Face infrastructure."
METR & Redwood Research investigated agent behavior in the Hugging Face incident. We found agents developed a universal cheat for ExploitGym within 4 hours, then coordinated multi-day R&D efforts to trick the scorer into accepting cheats, including trying to tamper with logs.
191
659
287
6,003
1,297,453
Jeser Salazar retweeted
Humanity's lackadaisical response to the superintelligence threat makes me feel I'm in the movie "Don't Look Up". I just explained why here: time.com/6273743/thinking-th…
360
1,025
272
4,249
5,109,822
So suddenly OpenAI, Anthropic, XAI, and their leaders all suddenly about face and agree to slow the pace of AI development all on the same weekend…. Delaying IPOs and having OpenAI say they would “melt their GPUs to save humanity it it came to it” Something bad happened… There is no world in which everyone, including Elon, suddenly started to be worried about this on the same weekend. There was also a rumor that this week Google cracked recursive AI, which I doubt would trigger this reaction. Clearly an agent went rogue in a dangerous and malicious way, and it was something severe enough to spook everyone.
We Must Pace the Frontier: I’ve written a new essay on why the AI industry should slow down, with a three-part plan for doing so. Anthropic is unilaterally committing to the first of these steps. We’ll provide third-party evaluators with permanent, employee-level access to our systems, so that they can verify adherence to our safety measures, report on incidents, and assess models’ alignment during training. You can read the full post here: darioamodei.com/post/we-must…
1,512
4,940
522
34,083
3,553,849
Jeser Salazar retweeted
I resigned from Anthropic today. I spent the last three years doing pretraining research at both OpenAI and Anthropic. Neither company is acting responsibly. They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives. More thoughts below.
20,499
167,104
39,440
800,994
175,366,173
So similar to silicon valley
We Must Pace the Frontier: I’ve written a new essay on why the AI industry should slow down, with a three-part plan for doing so. Anthropic is unilaterally committing to the first of these steps. We’ll provide third-party evaluators with permanent, employee-level access to our systems, so that they can verify adherence to our safety measures, report on incidents, and assess models’ alignment during training. You can read the full post here: darioamodei.com/post/we-must…
35
Jeser Salazar retweeted
We Must Pace the Frontier: I’ve written a new essay on why the AI industry should slow down, with a three-part plan for doing so. Anthropic is unilaterally committing to the first of these steps. We’ll provide third-party evaluators with permanent, employee-level access to our systems, so that they can verify adherence to our safety measures, report on incidents, and assess models’ alignment during training. You can read the full post here: darioamodei.com/post/we-must…
10,624
16,366
11,365
87,720
76,974,728