Obscure Moderator #42/92 retweeted
Join us live at 12:20am. All are welcome.
If you disagree, we won’t vote you out.
xitter.cf/i/spaces/1PKqrNMjvgWGb
Obscure Moderator #42/92 retweeted
💥 💥 💥 BOOM
After many people were exiled from their X Space, ending with Tuco, this happened.
Triggersmart stepped up to speak, delivering a message that most (not all) in the room needed to hear. However, it seems they somehow didn’t realize he was talking ABOUT THEM! 🤣 🤷🏻♂️
They were all throwing up ❤️, 💯, and 👏🏻 emojis while he was giving them a much-needed reality check, and the people who needed to hear it the most, completely missed it. 🤦🏻♂️
I bet if you’ve spent any time in these X Spaces, you know exactly which ones needed to hear it too. 💯
Obscure Moderator #42/92 retweeted
Recently, there has been a lot of chatter around Glacier -- with much of it coming from ad reads from @realcandaceo/@baroncoleman/@ShawnRyan762, while @leahfiles bashes it. I'm no fan of the app, but much of the chatter simply misses the bigger picture.
Full disclosure: I am no fan of any of these people, and half of them have me blocked. This is purely an objective assessment of the discussion. Feel free to read Leah's article here (theleahfiles.substack.com/p/…) and judge for yourself.
Obscure Moderator #42/92 retweeted
Ya'll are gonna make us come to your spaces and embarrass you in front of all of your friends again, aren't you?
The first X Invasion was brutal! Andrew, Rob and The Crucible Crew ripped the ops apart!
Last night’s Crucible X Invasion was another open invitation for every Charlie Kirk conspiracy op to step up and defend their claims with actual evidence.
None of them showed…. 🦗
They’ll flood the timeline all day with theories, accusations, and “questions,” but the second there’s a live Space where they have to face Andrew Wilson again and put up or shut up, it’s complete silence.
They were all too busy crying under their beds about Smokey Man Bad!
Obscure Moderator #42/92 retweeted
“If you have to tell people what to believe, you will never be a gangster. You have to show people what to believe, then allow them to think for themselves.
Take that echo chamber garbage back to the other side of 8mile”
-Slim 🔥🔥🔥🫳🎤
My 2nd grade teacher asked our class what we wanted to be when we grew up. Most kids said astronauts, doctors, or firefighters. Some said professional athletes, pilots, maybe even rockstars.
Well I told her I wanted to be a gangster that leads an entire app in the total amount of users who have me blocked, so to keep my promise to Ms. Fizzle, I will continue to call it how I see it.
I believe the productivity in this space is equal to, or less than, zero. Research, evidence, and/or quality discussions about the case seem to be non-existent.
From the creator/moderator mess, the group avatars making fun of people, shunning people who dare challenge the views of other speakers on the panel, collective efforts to blindly support or cancel people, constant beef w/ ppl, crying, meltdowns, blocking people then claiming “boundaries” …
… it’s all drama & emotion.
If you have to tell people what to believe, you will never be a gangster. You have to show people what to believe, then allow them to think for themselves.
Take that echo chamber garbage back to the other side of 8mile
-slim
Obscure Moderator #42/92 retweeted
Exactly! She's such an absolute imbecile!
Candace Owens once again proves that she has no clue what she’s talking about. All she needed was a 10 second Google search on the First Amendment. 🤣
Presidents have been publicly commenting on cases for decades. Criticism isn’t a court order and it doesn’t erase due process.
But sure, the Constitution is just an “opinion” when it gets in the way of the narrative.
Obscure Moderator #42/92 retweeted
My 2nd grade teacher asked our class what we wanted to be when we grew up. Most kids said astronauts, doctors, or firefighters. Some said professional athletes, pilots, maybe even rockstars.
Well I told her I wanted to be a gangster that leads an entire app in the total amount of users who have me blocked, so to keep my promise to Ms. Fizzle, I will continue to call it how I see it.
I believe the productivity in this space is equal to, or less than, zero. Research, evidence, and/or quality discussions about the case seem to be non-existent.
From the creator/moderator mess, the group avatars making fun of people, shunning people who dare challenge the views of other speakers on the panel, collective efforts to blindly support or cancel people, constant beef w/ ppl, crying, meltdowns, blocking people then claiming “boundaries” …
… it’s all drama & emotion.
If you have to tell people what to believe, you will never be a gangster. You have to show people what to believe, then allow them to think for themselves.
Take that echo chamber garbage back to the other side of 8mile
-slim
Obscure Moderator #42/92 retweeted
She is so stupid!
Candace Owens once again proves that she has no clue what she’s talking about. All she needed was a 10 second Google search on the First Amendment. 🤣
Presidents have been publicly commenting on cases for decades. Criticism isn’t a court order and it doesn’t erase due process.
But sure, the Constitution is just an “opinion” when it gets in the way of the narrative.
Obscure Moderator #42/92 retweeted
DANGEROUS LIBERTY PODCAST - RESTREAM ANNOUNCEMENT
CHARLIE KIRK: CONSPIRACIES DEBATE
📅 Friday, October 23, 2026 | 10 PM ET
Tonight we're restreaming my debate with Blake Bednarz (@BlakeBednarz) about Charlie Kirk's assassination, the evidence, and the conspiracy theories surrounding UVU.
Facts matter. Claims deserve scrutiny.
📺 WATCH LIVE:
youtube.com/live/_OCja7lI-1s…
🔔 LIKE, SUBSCRIBE & HIT THE BELL!
🔁 SHARE THE SHOW!
☕ SUPPORT THE SHOW — BUY ME A COFFEE:
buymeacoffee.com/paramounttf
Dangerous Liberty Podcast | No Narrative Required.
#CharlieKirk #DangerousLibertyPodcast
Obscure Moderator #42/92 retweeted
Rob uses the Sam Harris Islam argument to EXPOSE the crowd cheering Charlie Kirk's murder @realmaxpacheco
Obscure Moderator #42/92 retweeted
I’ve been here trying to combat the Charlie Kirk “investigation” space since it started.
Plenty of us were already pushing back on the theories, but we couldn’t generate real pressure against the volume of untested claims and the people driving them.
Back in June, Andrew Wilson anointed himself as the official TPUSA Charlie Kirk conspiracy theorist liaison. His stated mission was simple: all questions and claims from the Candace Owens/Baron Coleman crowd go through him, live, on the record, via The Crucible. He even predicted the coalition would fracture under its own contradictions.
We needed that level of force!
Andrew Wilson and The Crucible Crew don’t do soft commentary. They put claims under live cross-examination, demand evidence, and systematically dismantle the narratives that were shifting blame onto innocent people. Once that pressure hit, the first six months of relative quiet gave way to exactly the ratchet chaos and open infighting we’re seeing now.
This was calculated, and it is playing out just as Andrew predicted it would!
🤖 Made with AI
Obscure Moderator #42/92 retweeted
Nice to see more people waking up to the fraud Baron Coleman really is!
For the better part of a year, people like Gary Melton @paramounttactcl have been calling this out with receipts! The shifting stories, the “I confirmed Tyler was in custody by 6:25 on the 11th” claim used to wave away the Discord messages, the selective transparency. I’ve echoed those same points the whole time because the pattern is consistent and obvious.
He sells the “just ask me if you want to know something” bit hard, then ignores straightforward, respectful questions the moment the answer doesn’t fit the narrative or protect the preferred side. Exactly what Michelle just described.
Not honest. Not humble. Just the same disingenuous act he’s run for months.
The receipts have been public. Glad the blinders are finally coming off for more people. 🫡
🔥🔥🔥
I support @leahfiles completely. I also support Candace. I gave @baroncoleman a chance to respond to why he chose to do what he did. He’s always “if you want to know something just ask me” well I did and I did it respectfully. He completely ignored me which is not surprising.
He’s neither honest nor humble. So I canceled my membership unsubscribed and unfollowed.
I’m speaking for myself. I’ve no problems with mutuals feeling differently.
Obscure Moderator #42/92 retweeted
The defense’s own status charts from August and mid-October show how little of the discovery they’ve even fully processed.
As of late August they had roughly 29,000 files totaling a few terabytes downloaded and organized, but only about 20–23% fully coded and ready for detailed review. The October update shows only modest movement on some earlier batches while later productions are still largely untouched. That’s before you even count the separate 12+ TB of device extractions (600k+ files and millions of artifacts), the million-plus Discord messages, and the tens of thousands of location records.
What the public has actually seen is a thin slice of that: the key pieces the State put up at the preliminary hearing (DNA on the rifle, the surveillance linking him to the scene, the admissions through the roommate and texts). The rest of the volume is still sitting with the defense, mostly unprocessed or only partially coded two months later.
Calling it a mountain isn’t speculation or spin. It’s their numbers. Pretending the evidence is thin so you can call people stupid for noticing the scale is just cope. The defense is the one saying they need until 2029 because of how much is still left to go through.
Replying to @aburkhartlaw
Related: The defense filed a second discovery status update after their first report in August. What stands out is how little progress they've made in processing the discovery in the last 2 months.
Obscure Moderator #42/92 retweeted
Uncle Tom tried the classic “you don’t actually know this, it’s all second-hand” trap on Honest Ash. He thought this was going to go his way! 🤣
She dog-walked Ole Tom through why Google Trends is useless for investigating specific people. Google’s own FAQ says those one-off spikes on low-volume terms are statistical noise and should not be treated as real search activity. The method gets gamed with fake names and still spits out the same blips.
Tom walked in thinking he was setting her up to look like a fool, only to be made a fool himself.
Trends is not evidence. It’s noise. The only real trend I see is Uncle Tom getting embarrassed repeatedly on X Spaces! 🤣
@realhonestash
Obscure Moderator #42/92 retweeted
Hopefully @danksterintel is proud he explained it so well that even a stupid head like me understands it 🤣
Uncle Tom tried the classic “you don’t actually know this, it’s all second-hand” trap on Honest Ash. He thought this was going to go his way! 🤣
She dog-walked Ole Tom through why Google Trends is useless for investigating specific people. Google’s own FAQ says those one-off spikes on low-volume terms are statistical noise and should not be treated as real search activity. The method gets gamed with fake names and still spits out the same blips.
Tom walked in thinking he was setting her up to look like a fool, only to be made a fool himself.
Trends is not evidence. It’s noise. The only real trend I see is Uncle Tom getting embarrassed repeatedly on X Spaces! 🤣
@realhonestash
Obscure Moderator #42/92 retweeted
A lot of people sit behind computer and phone screens and just yell anonymously into the void, Max is putting in the work and actually talking to people and engaging in conversation, not just debate… just like Charlie wanted.
Go Max
Thanks to everyone who came out today! Big thanks especially to the Austin Peay University TPUSA Chapter for graciously hosting me as well. And @robnoerr for having my back.
Stay tuned here on X and on the YT channel for clips and updates on where I’ll be headed next 👀



































