Why? God why!?! ... oooh kittens

Joined July 2018
Fly retweeted
Lesbians don’t have a ‘preference’ for vagina over a penis on a partner. They are exclusively same-sex sexually orientated. Female homosexuality. Telling lesbians that they have a ‘preference’ is insinuating that they can unlearn that preference. The real conversion therapy is by trans activists.
9
62
1
341
3,992
The fact you think an inverted penis tucked into a surgical wound, so that other men can stick their dicks in you, is a functioning vagina, tells us exactly what you think a woman is.
The thing ppl call here "cutted off penis" or "rotten hole" Yeah... sure 😆 Its a C1$ looking and functionating neovagina. No matter what you think, it is absolutely amazing what medical science can do these days 😉
124
622
5
7,041
71,233
"Terfs don't support butches" Butches are gender non conforming lesbian women. Terfs are critical of gender stereotypes and norms. Ofc we support them, and many terfs are butches themselves. Actually, we CELEBRATE female masculinity, bc they are breaking free from the norms (femininity) that society is enforcing on women. That is a feat in of itself ❤️🙏
50
150
7
1,066
11,084
"Trans rights" is not about "inclusion." It's about allowing men to abolish women as a sex class by making them members of a class that includes males. This is an act of exclusion of women through the inclusion of men. So cut the "inclusion" nonsense already.
49
700
33
3,218
22,798
The violent world in which we live is a product of the values of patriarchy. Patriarchy seeks to perpetuate male control. Trans ideology, which seeks to abolish women as a sex class in favor of a redefined class of women that includes men, fits with that goal. This is why many social institutions have embraced trans ideology. It's not about "inclusion"; it's about excluding women as part of perpetuating patriarchal control.
13
57
7
222
4,726
The trans paradox:
37
338
15
1,622
16,145
A Colorado woman got a theft summons for a $25 porch package because Flock cameras showed her Rivian driving through the area. The cop told her he was “100% sure,” refused to look at her own camera/GPS proof she was somewhere else getting fitted for a dress, and only dropped it later. She’s now suing Flock, the towns, and the officers for warrantless mass surveillance. This is the surveillance state in action—anyone can be targeted on a plate hit with zero probable cause.
254
2,931
124
20,796
2,217,382
I believe gender dysphoria is real. I believe trans people deserve kindness. I try my hardest on here to be kind, even though I’m not treated kindly by them. I believe nobody should be bullied or abused for being trans. I also believe that a male person remains male and a female person remains female. And when a space is separated by sex, there is a reason for it. All of those things can be true at the same time.
120
115
15
1,441
53,568
Today after our prison protest in Massachusetts, 17 of us went for lunch at the Tavern in the Square. And of course @jk_rowling came up. We were marveling at how the people who scream about how hateful she is and how she enjoys making trans people suffer can never quote a single thing she's actually said on the issue. They've never read any of the very extensive arguments she's made about it. But they think they know that she hates trans people and wants them all destroyed. Wil Wheaton is sure she's evil and hateful, because he's never once bothered to read her actual words and try to have empathy for why she has real concerns for the rights of women. That's the unfortunate state of progressivism today: demonizing the people you disagree with is far more important than understanding what you're actually disagreeing with. P.S. I greatly regret my teenage crush on Wil, who grew up into a raging jackass.
Wil Wheaton loses it on J.K. Rowling and Harry Potter: “J.K. Rowling’s a piece of s***. She’s a hateful, disgusting, despicable human being. She gets off on the suffering of others. I don’t know what her f***ing problem is. I don’t know why she can’t leave people alone. I hate her, and what I want everyone to understand is, when you watch this program, you are putting money in her pocket that she turns around and spends to hurt people.” Does this make you like JK Rowling less or more?
42
124
5
1,361
33,768
If government can change the ordinary meaning of the word “woman”, they can change the ordinary meaning of any word you rely on for your rights. They have proven that. Women’s rights are the canary in the coal mine of an ideology being imposed upon people by the state. 👇
73
889
45
4,039
99,011
The belief that women's oppression is a problem of pronouns or presentation is not just sloppy and stupid; from a radical feminist perspective, it is deeply reactionary, offensive and sexist. Trans rights activists are materially indistinguishable from men's rights activists.
3
38
194
1,660
By substituting an artificial social performance (gender) for an unalterable biological reality (sex), gender theory has achieved a bizarre outcome: it defends patriarchal stereotypes as if they are innate identities, dismisses the oppression of women as secondary to men who are oppressed by other men for imitating women, and labels feminism as "exclusionary" for prioritizing female people.
35
363
17
1,222
14,741
A man who violates gender norms or identifies as a woman is defying social norms. The danger to him is rooted in the punishment of heresy or deviance from the ruling class. That is fundamentally distinct from the total, systemic, cradle-to-grave legal and physical enslavement experienced by women and girls historically, and continued in many parts of the world. It is extremely offensive to compare the punishment of men by other men for imitating women to the punishments women and girls in male supremacist societies endure. Men and boys in male supremacist societies retain the biological features that exempt them from forced pregnancy, child marriage, and the structural caste status of being legally and physically considered the property of men.
4
33
1
128
1,750
I don’t want to fight about women’s rights every fucking day. I want to live. I want to laugh with my friends. I want to read books. I want to worry about stupid things. I want to grow old without having to constantly explain why female people deserve privacy, safety and boundaries. But when you realise something you’ve taken for granted is being chipped away, you either say something or you stay quiet. And I’ve never been very good at staying quiet.
11
14
1
99
1,119
People keep saying: “But what rights are women actually losing?” Well, start with the right to have spaces where sex matters. Changing rooms. Toilets. Hospital wards. Prisons. Refuges. Women’s organisations. Sport. These weren’t invented because women hate men. They exist because female bodies and male bodies are different and sometimes women need privacy, safety or fairness on that basis. That isn’t hatred. It’s the entire reason sex-based protections exist.
24
200
4
901
8,070
Telling an eighty-year-old woman to "check the portal" for serious biopsy results is cruelty disguised as digital efficiency. My 82-year-old aunt had a lung biopsy done two weeks ago. The doctor told her they’d have the pathology report ready within five business days. Friday afternoon rolled around. No call. She dialed the clinic’s main desk, her voice shaking with anxiety. The receptionist cut her off before she could finish explaining: “Doctor doesn’t give results over the phone anymore. All lab findings are automatically released to your MyChart patient portal.” My aunt said, “Sweetheart, I don’t have a computer. I have a landline on my kitchen wall. Can the doctor just tell me if I have cancer?” The receptionist sighed into the receiver: “It’s hospital network policy. We can’t bypass the portal. You’ll have to have a family member create an account and view the file.” My aunt spent an entire seventy-two-hour weekend sitting in her recliner, gripping her reading glasses, convinced she was dying. I drove out to her house on Monday morning, set up a profile on my laptop, and pulled up the records. The result was benign. The pathology report had been uploaded four days earlier. A doctor spent three minutes clicking an upload button, and an elderly woman endured four days of sheer psychological terror because the hospital decided a phone call was too expensive. Since when did delivering medical news become a self-service task?
2,769
12,295
715
55,244
1,751,897
Buckner seems to forget the W in @WNBA stand for women. There was nothing wrong with what Sophie said originally. It’s the response from WNBA that made it blow up. The policy is the problem, not Sophie Cunningham
147
1,046
41
13,479
425,278
I can promise you insurance companies are taking notice. Rates will skyrocket. Doctors will be wary of being sued. Hospitals will want to avoid the headache. And people will see the opportunity for big payouts. YAY!!!!!!!! I hope it costs the monsters all dearly.
A New York jury just awarded $2 MILLION to a young woman who underwent a double mastectomy at 16 and later detransitioned. The jury found her psychologist and surgeon liable for malpractice. Her case alleged that serious mental-health issues, including depression, body dysmorphia, anorexia and autism-spectrum traits, were not adequately addressed before an irreversible procedure was performed on a minor. Now watch what happens when someone like her speaks publicly. For years we were told regret was exceedingly rare. We were told these procedures were necessary care. We were told questioning the process itself was dangerous. But when a detransitioner stands up and says, “This happened to me,” suddenly she becomes the problem. That is the epistemic tell. When evidence supports the narrative, it is celebrated. When evidence contradicts the narrative, the person carrying the evidence gets attacked. A jury heard the testimony. A jury examined the evidence. A jury found malpractice. And a jury put the damages at $2 million. You don’t protect vulnerable young people by demanding silence from the ones who came back and said, “I wish someone had slowed this down.” You protect them by listening. #AStoneGroove #SilentMajoritySpeaks
41
199
10
1,405
18,259
Women discussing incontinence after childbirth or menopause are not being unreasonable. At the Green Party conference a pelvic-floor physiotherapist was invited to speak, by Zoom, on exactly that. Activists responded by carrying trans flags into the room because they object to her recognising sex. No one has changed sex. Female pelvic-floor injury, estrogen loss and delivery trauma remain sex-specific. Treating a clinical talk on those facts as a safeguarding problem does not protect anyone’s healthcare; it just makes the discussion harder to hold.
47
545
16
4,624
123,327
I’ve just realised the “left” in the west have almost perfectly recreated the Christian moral establishment they used to oppose, especially in entertainment. - approved representations replace approved family values - “problematic” replaces “sinful” - sensitivity readers replace morality policing - censorship is back. - public denunciation replaces sermons - watching or reading the “wrong” fiction becomes evidence of a defective character - bad art is defended because the message is “righteous” Well done. You have become the thing actual progressives detested.
16
35
1
163
2,615