Joined November 2013
It’s official: a legal investigation has found engineers in Britain’s electricity grid control room are stressed because renewables make it so hard to keep the lights on. And when they raise concerns, managers won’t listen - they only want “good news” thetimes.com/article/413d547…
74
563
68
2,104
179,055
Czech PM Backs UK Rejoining EU: “We Need More Money” order-order.com/2026/10/16/c…
22
78
7
204
13,379
Replying to @JamesCleverly
You mean THIS Reform councillor? Why are you holding him like that? How close are you two? 🤨
36
258
13
888
14,474
Arsenal fans, you have a chance to sit down and let Enzo Maresca school you on how to beat PSG so you don't repeat the same mistakes next time.
3,082
1,351
2,241
7,120
806,413
The Truth is finally out. The Russians made 17.4m people vote Leave. I explain how in this ground-breaking Expose:
184
295
61
1,111
29,553
I find it fascinating how many people on this site can dish it out but can’t take it.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Until recently, Mehdi preemptively disabled comments on many of his posts. He described this as a way to mute 'Islamophobes'. x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… Late June 2026: x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st… x.com/mehdirhasan/st…
1,347
255
507
3,530
835,048
Paul B retweeted
Interesting history lesson, Mayor. You left out one rather awkward detail: Oswald Mosley was not some creature who appeared fully formed from the "political right". He had been a Labour MP, sat on Labour’s NEC and was a member of the Fabian Society before founding the British Union of Fascists. Even George Bernard Shaw, one of the great Fabian luminaries, was still publicly praising Mosley in 1932, after the BUF had been founded. Which does rather spoil the neat little morality tale in which fascism belonged exclusively to “the other side”. History is considerably more inconvenient than a mayoral tweet. We see you.
90 years ago today, Oswald Mosley and his Blackshirts attempted to march through and intimidate a predominantly Jewish area of the East End. Men, women and children, alongside local residents, trade unionists and anti-fascist protesters, came together to defend the community in what became known as the Battle of Cable Street. They taught us an important lesson: communities can resist fascism by joining together. Hate and antisemitism had no place in London then, and it has no place here now.
251
2,794
87
12,583
381,040
Paul B retweeted
Grangemouth and Lindsey refineries closed on Miliband's watch because of Miliband's policies and now he's calling for maximum refinery production. 🤡🌎
Today @G7 members have agreed coordinated measures to stabilise energy supplies, build resilience in supply chains and shield households and businesses from price shocks. We agreed to: - Release strategic reserves of 100m barrels, coordinated by the IEA - Maximise global refinery production - A joint commitment to refrain from export restrictions between G7 countries. - Calling for the immediate and full restoration of navigational rights and principles in the Strait of Hormuz Full statement below 👇 gov.uk/government/news/g7-le…
39
360
10
1,216
16,305
Yes, it was you. Here it is. I wonder what the @guardian @guardiannews makes of it -- a "journalist" threatening people who questioned her claims to make trouble for them. So nice! So right! So righteous!!!
1
4
24
956
Paul B retweeted
Same Home Secretary. Two counter-terror cases. 👇 July, Suffolk: police called the threat to UK Ijtima extreme right-wing. She named British Muslims, called it hatred, and said lives had been saved. Nobody had been charged. Today, Gloucestershire: men arrested on explosives offences near RAF Fairford, homes evacuated, bomb teams on scene. She says it would be inappropriate to comment further. 🙄
86
598
44
1,956
73,165
🚨 Following on from RAF Fairford the Government as just announced they will be handing out a leaflet to new arrivals 👇🏻
3
116
5
297
5,240
You mean a 10th British counter disinformation unit is "long overdue" Emily -- there are already nine. 1.National Security Online Information Team 2.Government Communication Service 3.Media Monitoring Unit 4.Research, Information and Communications Unit 5.Defending Democracy Taskforce 6.Joint Election Security and Preparedness Unit 7.FCDO Information Threats and Influence Directorate 8.NCSC and GCHQ (which investigate hostile cyber activity and information threats) 9.Social Cohesion Taskforce
A British counter disinformation centre is long overdue, and very welcome.
133
1,301
62
3,714
73,873
Two things the government is doing right now: 1) Launching a National Centre for Information Defence to battle 'far-Right narratives' and 'distorted and untrue' narratives about Britain. 2) Using legal action to prevent the release of crime data broken down by nationality.
137
1,632
31
7,145
113,514
For some context, £18.3 billion is equivalent to the lifetime taxes of about 14,324 households. The government borrowed the lifetime taxes of over 14,000 households in one month.
6
34
2
80
5,292
I wasn’t familiar with the facts and therefore wouldn’t condemn Sunderland Council on the hoof, as Nick Ferrari seemed to want me to. Having listened to the Reform Leader of Sunderland Council’s remarks, he makes a very fair point. Whilst Show Racism The Red Card may have done good work and tackling racism and discrimination in football is something we can all unite around, it’s clear their CEO Ged Grebby is a left-wing political activist whose blatant bias damages the organisation and its cause. He’s described Reform as “very, very dangerous”, “Far Right”, said that “racists were emboldened by Farage” and that people need to “mobilise” against them. Hardly conduct befitting the CEO of a “leading educational charity”, as they describe themselves. In fact his X account is a sewer of anti-Reform rants. That’s not a view most people in Sunderland clearly share as almost 80% of its council seats were won by Reform in May. Residents would be right to question whether this organisation should be supported financially by their council under Mr Grebby’s leadership. Taxpayers shouldn’t be paying the wages of political activists like Mr Grebby. If Show Racism The Red Card wants to command public support, and receive public money and charitable status, I’d suggest they look for a new CEO.
'You don't want to try and drive racism out of football..?' Robert Jenrick finds out live on air that a Reform-led council have pulled funding for Show Racism The Red Card.
244
194
36
1,635
293,904
I never had a problem with billionaires donating money to political parties untill I discovered that some of them had been donating money to parties I don't like. That really changed my perspective on things.
10
118
5
1,645
12,022
We looked at the consequences of applying the mansion tax to £1.5m properties back in July. It ain’t a great idea, even in its own terms. You have to value a lot more homes, but don’t collect a lot more money. Full analysis and modelling: taxpolicy.org.uk/2026/07/07/…
Exclusive from @benclatworthy Labour is considering plans to extend the mansion tax to properties worth more than £1.5 million in the Budget in a move that would hit nearly 300,000 homes The government originally announced an extra levy worth between £2,500 and £7,500 a year on properties worth more than £2 million at the budget last November. It was expected to hit about 134,000 homes John Healey, the chancellor, is now considering extending the levy to properties worth more than £1.5 million, which would mean the number of properties caught by the tax would more than double to 271,000 homes based on current values Two government sources told The Times that lowering the threshold was a “live discussion” in the Treasury as Healey tries to find about £10 billion to balance the books in the budget on October 28. Experts have suggested that the proposal could raise £800 million a year A Whitehall source said it would signal a more “aggressive” approach to taxing wealth in a move that would appeal to backbenchers while raising additional revenues “This is seen as the most viable option because the Valuation Office is already doing the work to identify the homes worth more than £2 million, so it isn’t a massive change to capture those over £1.5 million,” they said A second government source confirmed the discussions but said there were concerns that the change would hit more modest properties in London and affect people who are not wealthy. They emphasised that no decisions have been taken The government will not push ahead with plans to overhaul stamp duty and council tax that were championed by Andy Burnham because they would take years to implement and involve a huge revaluation exercise thetimes.com/article/9e82024…
83
141
13
686
116,259
I see that Stella Creasy is accusing me of leading a pitchfork mob against her, because I opined that she is less likeable and more hypocritical than the wild parakeet she mistook for an escaped pet. For those who don’t know, Creasy is an elected politician and self-proclaimed ‘old-fashioned feminist’ who is ‘still fighting the patriarchy’. She’s more than once publicly defined herself against me (and my reaction was not to accuse her of leading a mob, even though I was probably averaging a dozen death threats a day at the point when the article below appeared.) I thought it might be instructive for those of us who don’t share Creasy’s brand of ‘feminism’ to examine her campaigning record, so we can learn to do better. Creasy wants women admitted to the male-only, exclusive, London-based private members Garrick Club, a change that would benefit rather privileged women like Creasy. Creasy is a mother who wants better accommodations for working mothers, a change that would benefit Creasy. Creasy takes selfies at a men-only Muslim march because that reminds everyone how non-racist she is, which benefits Creasy. Creasy asserts that ‘trans women are women’, which keeps her in good odour with her party’s most aggressive activists, and benefits Creasy. However, keeping cross-dressing heterosexual men out of nurses’ changing rooms doesn’t benefit Creasy, because Creasy has never had to mop up other people’s piss, blood and vomit at work. Challenging the notion that a male basketball player becomes a girl if he says he is doesn’t benefit Creasy, who has no sporting ambitions. Speaking up against the patriarchy as practised by non-white men doesn’t benefit Creasy, who wants those selfie-opportunities. Criticising an ideological movement that persecutes, harasses and openly threatens women who don’t believe some women have penises wouldn't benefit Creasy, because she's already fully-signed up to self-id, where any man who says he's a woman must be taken at his word. As the late Gloria Steinem said: ‘“Feminism has never been about getting a job for one woman. It's about making life more fair for women everywhere.’ Creasy the patriarchy-challenger is provably more than happy to cosy up to men and misogynist movements when it suits her public profile and career advancement, no matter the harms those men might be causing less privileged women. By Steinem’s definition, what Stella espouses is not feminism, but Creasyism, and I suggest the emblem for this brave new rights movement should be an indignant parakeet with severely ruffled feathers. telegraph.co.uk/women/life/s…
2,126
8,443
617
52,660
1,431,845
We didn’t vote for you to make any tweaks at all. You effectively bought a seat in the Commons from someone you’ve since promoted to a well-paid role, and ousted the sitting PM. You’ve no mandate beyond his manifesto. All the cheeky chappy clichés in the world won’t change that.
I didn’t become Prime Minister to just make a few tweaks around the edges. I want to change the way this country works. For too long, politics became comfortable with the idea that some things just can't be fixed. People sleeping on our streets. Huge inequalities between different parts of the country. Young people unable to afford a home. Communities watching decisions about their future being taken somewhere else, by someone else. Governments have talked about those things. They've even promised to fix them. But too often, they've reached the same conclusion: it just can't be done. I don't accept that, and I never have. That’s why we’ve invested to offer everyone who needs it a route off the streets by Christmas. It's why we've announced the biggest council housebuilding programme since the Second World War. It's why we're opening 159 new mental health centres. It's why we've finally put technical education on par with the academic route. It's why we're delivering the biggest transfer of power out of Westminster and into local communities in a generation. And it's why we opened No10 North too. Not as another government office. But because I believe one thing very strongly: Britain won't be rebuilt from the top down. You have to put power back in the hands of the people and places that know their communities best - and then put the full weight of government behind them. I also want to give people a bit of breathing space too. That's why we've cut tax on electricity bills, capped bus fares at £2, and made subscriptions easier to cancel. It’s why we've cracked down on fake discounts and cut business rates for pubs, social clubs and music venues. And it's why we've extended the 16-17 Saver Railcard and introduced free 24/7 bus travel for disabled people. That is the change we have started. More power for our communities, more support on the cost of living and a long-term plan to rebuild the country. Each one of those changes is part of the same thing. Good growth in every postcode. Reindustrialising Britain. And making sure wherever you live - and whatever your background - you feel this country has a future for you. Because, in the end, that's what this is about: bringing back hope.
25
482
12
2,528
46,266
2
43
2
156
58,128