NotGuilty retweeted
when I say ‘chat’ it’s because i’m referring to the imaginary twitch chat that is constantly observing me not chatgpt
NotGuilty retweeted
Don't let Obama play the Iran card in order to start a war in order to get elected--be careful Republicans!
Anthropic: “We’ll work with the military on everything except autonomous killer robots and mass surveillance of Americans.”
The Pentagon: “We don’t plan to do those things.”
Anthropic: “Great, put it in writing.”
The Pentagon: “No.”
Trump: “BAN THEM FROM THE ENTIRE GOVERNMENT.”
This may be one of the most consequential AI policy decisions in history
NotGuilty retweeted
Now that Obama’s poll numbers are in tailspin – watch for him to launch a strike in Libya or Iran. He is desperate.
NotGuilty retweeted
Remember that I predicted a long time ago that President Obama will attack Iran because of his inability to negotiate properly-not skilled!
NotGuilty retweeted
Ring paid somewhere between $8 and $10 million for a 30-second Super Bowl spot to tell 120 million viewers that their cameras now scan neighborhoods using AI.
The math is wild. Ring has roughly 20 million devices in American homes. Search Party is enabled by default. The opt-out rate on default settings in consumer tech is historically around 5%. So approximately 19 million cameras are now running AI pattern matching on anything that moves past your front door. Today the target is dogs. The same infrastructure already handles “Familiar Faces,” which builds biometric profiles of every person your camera sees, whether they know about it or not.
Ring settled with the FTC for $5.8 million after employees had unrestricted access to customers’ bedroom and bathroom footage for years. They’re now partnered with Flock Safety, which routes footage to local law enforcement. ICE has accessed Flock data through local police departments acting as intermediaries. Senator Markey’s investigation found Ring’s privacy protections only apply to device owners. If you’re a neighbor, a delivery driver, a passerby, you have no rights and no recourse.
This tells you everything about Amazon’s actual product. The customer paid for the camera. The customer pays the electricity. The customer pays the $3.99/month subscription. And Amazon gets a surveillance grid that would cost tens of billions to build from scratch, with an AI layer activated by default, and a law enforcement pipeline already connected.
They wrapped all of that in a lost puppy commercial because that’s the only version of this story anyone would willingly opt into.
NotGuilty retweeted
I just want to name how profoundly disgusted I am, and I think we should all be, by this set of demands. Almost all of this is entirely, profoundly unenforceable — meaning it's meaningless! (Who could possibly look at this administration's record, to say nothing of ICE's policy of violating court orders, and think that almost any of this would have any material impact.)
They have abandoned any demands regarding ICE's obscene budget. They have abandoned anything related to creating a mechanism for victims to sue ICE for its constitutional violations. They have abandoned anything related to stopping ICE from subverting the upcoming elections.
And this is Dems' opening bid! This is the "full loaf" that they are, I am sure, prepared to accept a slice or a crumb from! Just a profound, profound political failure, in the face of outright fascism. I think this merits — or actually necessitates — an outraged response.
SENATE AND HOUSE DEMOCRATS ARE UNITED ON REINING IN THE ABUSES OF ICE.
Americans have watched in horror as ICE has terrorized communities across the country.
Federal agents can’t continue to cause chaos in our cities while more Americans are killed. We must rein in ICE.
Here’s what we are demanding:
NotGuilty retweeted
The four prosecutors who spearheaded a $250 million Minnesota fraud case will not be in court at the next trial because .. they've all left their jobs in recent days, along with more than a dozen others in a growing wave of resignations
cbsnews.com/news/minnesota-f…
NotGuilty retweeted
STOP USING YOUR NOTES APP AS A PASSWORD VAULT
STOP USING YOUR NOTES APP AS A PASSWORD VAULT
STOP USING YOUR NOTES APP AS A PASSWORD VAULT
STOP USING YOUR NOTES APP AS A PASSWORD VAULT
STOP USING YOUR NOTES APP AS A PASSWORD VAULT
STOP USING YOUR NOTES APP AS A PASSWORD VAULT
NotGuilty retweeted
Really can’t get over this video of more than a half dozen ICE agents forming a tactical perimeter at a suburban Minnesota Target so their commander can use the bathroom, cosplaying like they’re in Fallujah.
What an absurd waste of taxpayer dollars.
NotGuilty retweeted
Find you someone who looks at you the way Justice Gorsuch looks at cert. petitions involving tribal sovereignty.
NotGuilty retweeted
Law enforcement officers who lie *should* be fired...
But, I'm sorry to say, they aren't. So routinely we have a term you should know: testilying.
Law enforcement officers who lie are normally fired. Lying taints casework, makes an officer worse than useless for prosecutions, obtaining warrants, etc. when leaders lie it’s even worse.
theguardian.com/us-news/2025…
NotGuilty retweeted
A particularly funny example of the principle that “cops frequently lie in sworn court testimony.”
“Lairmore had testified that the sandwich ‘exploded all over’ his chest and claimed he could smell mustard and onions. But a photo showed that the sandwich was still in its wrapper on the ground after it hit Lairmore in his bulletproof vest.” nbcnews.com/politics/justice…
NotGuilty retweeted
Perfect example of why jury trials matter.
The government had to argue—in public—that throwing a sandwich at a man in a bulletproof vest caused “fear of immediate bodily harm.” And the jury called that what it was: overreach. Prosecutors shouldn’t go unchecked.
A jury has acquitted the D.C. "Sandwich Guy," despite testimony from a Border Patrol officer about the devastating impact of the footlong sandwich against his bulletproof vest. reason.com/2025/11/06/d-c-ju…
NotGuilty retweeted
A lot of the anti-SNAP rhetoric seems to be coming from people who think that people living in poverty should be eating prison rations and whatever they can scrounge from the nearest dumpster. Just an unfettered kind of evil that wishes undue suffering for the poor.
Crim defense lawyer here and I can tell you 100% of the welfare fraud cases I’ve seen are the government preying on the ignorance of poor people who fail to fill out paperwork properly or fail to update their new employment history (get a new job a raise etc)





























