NIK.JACK (@Niktav88) header
NIK.JACK (@Niktav88) profile picture

invest cryptocurrencies/๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’™ ๐Ÿ’™ /๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น(๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘)๐Ÿ’ฒ๐Ÿ’ฒ๐Ÿ’ฒ๐Ÿ’ฒ๐Ÿ’ฒ๐Ÿ’ฒ ottimistata,family_love,๐ŸŽผ๐ŸŽผ๐ŸŽผ๐ŸŽต๐ŸŽต๐ŸŽถ๐ŸŽถ ๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’™ ๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’™( #sscnapoli)๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’™

Italy
Joined June 2022
Photo by NIK.JACK (@Niktav88)Photo by NIK.JACK (@Niktav88)Photo by NIK.JACK (@Niktav88)Photo by NIK.JACK (@Niktav88)Photo by NIK.JACK (@Niktav88)Photo by NIK.JACK (@Niktav88)Photo by NIK.JACK (@Niktav88)Photo by NIK.JACK (@Niktav88)Photo by NIK.JACK (@Niktav88)Photo by NIK.JACK (@Niktav88)
๐Ÿ‘€๐Ÿ‘€๐Ÿ‘€ ๐Ÿš€ ๐Ÿ’ฃ
JUST IN: Pi Network ($PI, @PiCoreTeam) has a portfolio company buying its own token back. Axis Robotics will fund the move from part of the profits on its commercial contracts, with the amounts reported every quarter. How it works โฌ‡๏ธ Full story: bsc.news/news/axis-robotics-โ€ฆ
10
NIK.JACK retweeted
Calling all $AXIS believers! we need YOUR vote! Under 80 votes are needed to get $AXIS on the CoinMarketCap Top 100 Leaderboard. - Listing ID: 53028 CA: 0x5be75e3b0aff5d1a042a5363ae36acb1d6d755ea listinghelp.blog/?contract=0โ€ฆ
1
2
34
๐Ÿ”ฅ NEWS: AXIS ROBOTICS ANNOUNCES TOKEN BUYBACK PROGRAM @axisrobotics, a portfolio company of @PiCoreTeamโ€™s $PI Ventures, has announced a recurring buyback program for its new AXIS token. Under the plan, a portion of the profits generated from the company's commercial contracts will be allocated to purchasing AXIS directly from the open market. The company will also publish quarterly updates disclosing the amount of tokens bought back, giving the community greater visibility into its buyback activity. Connecting real commercial revenue with token buybacks adds another layer to AXIS's economic model, linking business performance to its token ecosystem.
5
5
33
1,735
NIK.JACK retweeted
LATEST: Pi Ventures-backed Axis Robotics has introduced quarterly AXIS buybacks The company will use a portion of profits from commercial contracts to purchase $AXIS tokens on the open market, with buyback amounts disclosed every quarter.
13
30
2
470
11,265
NIK.JACK retweeted
Axis Robotics announces AXIS token buybacks! @axisrobotics, a portfolio company of @PiCoreTeam's $PI Ventures, has just announced a scheme to deliver consistent buybacks on its new token. Per a new announcement, a portion of profits from the company's commercial contracts will be used to buyback AXIS from the market. Updates on the amount of buybacks will be published on a quarterly basis.
6
29
5
299
20,039
After 73 years, an Italian๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น is once again on top of the world. Antonelli, Formula 1 champion
16
NIK.JACK retweeted
Now Live: The Flu Forecast Game A game to predict how many in the US will be hospitalised with flu each week, created by @gensynai researchers Raf Frongillo and Bo Waggoner Why? Flu hospitalises 100s of 1000s each winter but severity is hard to predict flu.delphi.fyi
5
10
5
35
7,919
The beauty of Naples, with Mount Vesuvius in the background ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น
58
Compute isn't the only bottleneck in AI. @gensynai is focused on the next one: trustworthy information. It moved from decentralized compute to decentralized information aggregation, pairing data about real-world events with verifiable AI to build systems with better judgment.
1
1
5
668
In Italy, judges are enemies of the country.
Una decisione vergognosa
39
adding to this: Tim Harfordโ€™s recent FT piece asks whether we should let AI forecast at all on ForecastBench the best AI forecasters (68.8) are now level with human superforecasters (68.9), ahead of the average person (62.8) and untuned LLMs (~61). there are two caveats here worth looking at: [1] the humans and models answered different question sets, so โ€œparityโ€ leans on extrapolation, and [2] if 50 is a coin flip and 100 is omniscience, that means at this stage everyone/everything (LLMs) are still closer to basically randomly picking y/n than to being a hyperintelligent 'oracle'. I thought the meat and potatoes of his piece are that, historically, forecasting was a panel of experts 'debating the improbable in a highly structured way' -- something of a socratic method where the minds participating in the discussion are able to be open and flexible. Harford cites Philip Tetlock's study where he found that human forecasting tournaments result in less polarization because of this, with the argument being that handing the reins over to a set of models means we lose that exercise/practice. I'd tentatively agree with that, but with my own caveat -- I think information markets like @Delphi_fyi actually preserve it. humans still have to put a number on the future and get scored for it, right alongside the models. and since both price the same question at the same time, the comparison is like-for-like by default, which fixes the dataset problem Harford mentions (different sets of questions). Interesting read, curious to hear anybody else's take on it: timharford.com/2026/10/ai-caโ€ฆ
1/ how accurate are prediction markets? the latest study on PM accuracy from predictdesk found that the question you ask reveals a lot about how accurate pm platforms, as information elicitation tools, really are ๐Ÿงต
1
2
1
8
1,961
you should only be using auditably trained models open1b.gensyn.ai
We noticed some concerning behaviour in a popular open source model. Itโ€™s either an incidental relic from training or an intentional โ€˜call homeโ€™ mechanism. Either way itโ€™s surprising and highlights the significance of how you choose which models to use.
3
6
19
1,659
#AIGENSYN just waiting for breakout resistance ๐Ÿš€๐Ÿš€๐Ÿš€
3
2
16
4,430
Qualcosa non va in questo paese ๐Ÿค”
I figli della famiglia nel bosco giocavano con gli animali anzichรฉ andare a rubare capi firmati come il marocchino Youssef di soli 11 anni Gli assistenti sociali che dicono?
53
NIK.JACK retweeted
"...that somebody at home, on their device, on their laptop can actually check exactly what has happened on a model training run" Verifiable, auditable model training
Gensyn CEO @benfielding warns that AI agents auditing other AI agents can be compromised too: "We create swarms of AI agents that can do far more work than any human could. A human canโ€™t follow along and check everything. One of the big counters is to say that agents can do the verification." "But METR says those agents themselves can become corrupted by the training process, and you canโ€™t trust any agent thatโ€™s auditing another agent. If youโ€™ve trained a model in an auditable way, you can trust it." "Any claim where the model is hiding its chain of thought falls away, because you have an exact log of everything thatโ€™s happened, and you can rerun every single step on any device." "For national security, finance, pharma, health, insurance, itโ€™s essential that they have models like these. If a regulator wanted to audit, they wouldnโ€™t have to go off promises of the company." @gensynai
1
11
26
4,266
NIK.JACK retweeted
Gensyn CEO @benfielding warns that AI agents auditing other AI agents can be compromised too: "We create swarms of AI agents that can do far more work than any human could. A human canโ€™t follow along and check everything. One of the big counters is to say that agents can do the verification." "But METR says those agents themselves can become corrupted by the training process, and you canโ€™t trust any agent thatโ€™s auditing another agent. If youโ€™ve trained a model in an auditable way, you can trust it." "Any claim where the model is hiding its chain of thought falls away, because you have an exact log of everything thatโ€™s happened, and you can rerun every single step on any device." "For national security, finance, pharma, health, insurance, itโ€™s essential that they have models like these. If a regulator wanted to audit, they wouldnโ€™t have to go off promises of the company." @gensynai
5
15
3
51
10,880
NIK.JACK retweeted
Catch up on the recent podcast from @FrictionlessVC as @benfielding talks through the evolution of @gensynai, how we came to today, what comes next and why
Dropping a podcast with @benfielding, Co-Founder and CEO at @gensynai Ben started his PhD in deep learning in 2015, well before the current wave of attention around AI. In this episode I wanted to walk through how he thinks about the progress we have made, the economics of building bigger models, and what comes next. We get into why he questions whether the money going into centralized AI will be paid back through product usage, how open models affect that business, and why having customers who keep using your product matters more than staying ahead on a benchmark. We also walk through how Gensyn has changed. The team moved from focusing on decentralized compute to collecting truthful information from the world. Ben explains why they made that decision and how Delphi uses markets to bring information together and check it against what actually happens. That leads into forecasting. Ben thinks predicting future events could become a much bigger use of AI. We discuss how models could learn from being right or wrong, why people need a reason to share what they know, and what it would mean to have a probability calculator helping with everyday decisions. We discuss - Ben's background in deep learning and how Gensyn started - The economics of bigger AI models and whether the spending makes sense - Open models, competition, and building products people keep using - Why Gensyn moved away from focusing on compute - Verifying machine learning work and making training auditable with open-1b - Delphi, information markets, and learning from real outcomes - Rewarding people for sharing the evidence behind their predictions - Forecasting, better decisions, and where decentralization helps Timestamps 0:00 โ€“ Can AI Predict the Future? 1:14 โ€“ Ben Fielding and the Origins of Gensyn 7:26 โ€“ Scaling AI Beyond Bigger Clusters 13:29 โ€“ Why Startups Can Take a Different Approach 18:49 โ€“ Trust and Verifying Machine Learning 23:59 โ€“ The Economics of Centralized AI 27:29 โ€“ Why Gensyn Moved Away from Compute 31:09 โ€“ open-1b and Auditable AI Training 35:47 โ€“ Open Models and Closed Labs 43:29 โ€“ AI Products, Customers, and Neoclouds 50:13 โ€“ From LLMs to Forecasting 53:44 โ€“ Training Models to Make Better Predictions 57:10 โ€“ Delphi and Information Markets 1:02:26 โ€“ Rewarding the Evidence Behind a Prediction 1:04:34 โ€“ Where Crypto and AI Actually Overlap 1:11:35 โ€“ The Next Wave of AI Enjoy!
1
4
15
3,819
NIK.JACK retweeted
Coming up on todayโ€™s stream, @benfielding will be speaking live with @MTSlive
3
8
1
27
5,879
NIK.JACK retweeted
Further research from @SplezzzK and @gab_p_andrade "Nobody is Paying for Good Forecasts on Purpose" Two market systems co-existing in equilibrium to reward quality forecasting Read @SplezzzK's thread for a breakdown๐Ÿ‘‡
More than 100,000 Polymarket wallets have lost >=$1,000 since November 2022. A typical diagnosis is that retail is bad at forecasting. But before blaming the traders, letโ€™s ask what these marketโ€™s design actually rewards.๐Ÿงต
4
7
2
17
5,034
NIK.JACK retweeted
What is your must-see event? delphi.fyi
1
6
11
382