Pinned Tweet
There is a fundamental difference between collectivists (the left) and individualists (the right).
Individualists want to just be left alone to get on with their lives - buy a house, get married, have children, socialize, work, go to church, etc. All part of the traditional American dream. These are the builders that built western civilization.
Collectivists, on the other hand, want to control your life. They want to control your education, your money, your social interactions, your workplace, your beliefs. These are not builders - they just want what individualists build. And to control it.
These two groups are not compatible - but individualists, because they want to be left alone, will tolerate a certain amount of intrusion into their lives - this allows a society to function. By their nature, collectivists will keep pushing for more and more control.
This sort of works until those who wanted to be left alone feel they've had enough. That some line has been crossed, that the oppression becomes too much to bear. And make no mistake, it is oppression.
In almost any social/work group, leftists feel they can yell and spout their beliefs with impunity while conservatives feel silenced - unwilling to speak out because, once again, they just want to be left alone. This emboldens the left as they begin to feel they're a majority. They mistake the silence from the oppressed right as acquiescence. A dangerous mistake.
Sooner or later, collectivists will begin to view violence as a legitimate tool for gaining more control. This has been true throughout history - and in every country. Sometimes they succeed, sometimes not, but in every case the net result is suffering.
When those who wish to be left alone - the individualists, or right - feel the encroachment and interference from the left is too much - that a line has been crossed, they will fight back. And the violence they unleash will be biblical.
This is a warning to those on the left. Roll back the
rhetoric. The violence. The need to control everything. Do not keep pushing, for you will not like the response.
Learn to listen.
In memory of Charlie Kirk, a man who embodied the spirit of peaceful discussion. A man who believed that argument in good faith meant something. A man who believed in civilization. A man of God.
Peter retweeted
.@SecRubio: "Too often, these days, we build downwards. We design our standards to ensure that no one will lose. We preoccupy ourselves more with the comfort of the worst than the potential of the best. We hold the most exceptional things among us hostage to the average."
.@SecRubio: "The things we owe to this place as Americans — and as Westerners — are actually far, far deeper... What blossomed here in this place was the Western desire to uncover all that ignorance, darkness, and distance had kept hidden from the mind of man."
How are these retarded morons running out country?
Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband: 'I want to say to the millions of people in this country and indeed elsewhere, who have been moved and outraged by the plight of the Palestinian people. We hear you. You were right'
trib.al/uh5mVzw
📺 Sky 501, Virgin 602
Peter retweeted
Every time someone says "1948," we only get half the story. So here's the whole thing.
In November 1947, the UN voted to divide the land into two states, one Jewish and one Arab. The UN didn't give the Jews a country. It recognized a people with 3,000 years of roots in the land, who had been promised a home since 1917.
The Jews got a small, fragmented territory, and Jerusalem wasn't even part of it. They said yes anyway. The Arab leaders said no. The day after the vote, Jewish buses were attacked, and the country slid into war.
And to those who say Israel stole a country.
There was no Palestinian state to steal from. The land had been ruled by the Ottomans for 400 years and then by the British. Israel got its share through the UN. The rest came from a war the other side started.
On May 14, 1948, Israel declared independence. The next day, five Arab armies invaded from Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, and Iraq. The goal wasn't a Palestinian state. The goal was that there would be no Jewish state.
Israel had no real army and barely any weapons, and many of its soldiers were Holocaust survivors who had come ashore only months earlier. They won because the alternative was to die.
Yes, around 700,000 Palestinians lost their homes in that war. Some were expelled by Israeli forces. That's documented, and it shouldn't be denied. Others fled the fighting, and some were told by their own leaders to leave their villages until the Arab armies had won. They didn't.
But there was another expulsion nobody talks about.
Around 850,000 Jews were driven out or pushed out of Arab countries like Iraq, Egypt, Yemen, and Morocco. Families who had lived there for centuries lost everything. The Jews of Jerusalem's Old City were expelled by Jordan.
Israel took them in and gave them new lives.
The Arab countries did the opposite with the Palestinians.
They kept them in camps and in refugee status that is now passed down to the fourth generation, so today there are nearly six million registered refugees.
In Lebanon, they're still barred from a long list of professions. And from 1948 to 1967, Jordan held the West Bank and Egypt held Gaza. Neither of them created a Palestinian state. They could have done it at any time.
Israel took in refugees, drained swamps, and built a beautiful country with no oil and enemies on every border.
The Palestinian leaders were offered the same chance, and they chose war instead. Imagine what could have been built if they had said yes.
The roughly 160,000 Arabs who stayed in Israel became Israeli citizens. Today they number around two million, with the right to vote, their own parties, and seats in parliament.
So when someone says Israel was built on expulsion, remember the whole picture. The Palestinians were offered a state before Israel even existed. The Arab side chose war. Israel defended itself.
Israel didn't start that war. It just refused to lose it.
Am Israel Chai.❤️🔥
Refreshing to see an honest appraisal of the president's record.
We are approaching the fifth and last biennial election in the Trump era, and the president has asked voters to make it a referendum on him. Let's take a look at his record.
The tiresome and predictable criticism of a pro-Trump bias will come, as it always does when anyone tries to say anything positive about the president, but let me respond with two points. Firstly, one can dislike Trump and still recognize the accomplishments are real and laudable. If personal dislike for the president prevents someone from seeing that, the real bias problem is with them. Secondly, when 92 percent of media coverage on the president is anti-Trump, balance does not come from repeating what is already deafeningly amplified. It comes from stating the parts that are generally ignored.
The successes are significant and seldom discussed; let's look at the record that most of the press won't print:
• The illegal immigration crisis at the border has been ended
• With it, there has been a dramatic reduction in the horrors of human trafficking, the inflow of lethal narcotics, and cash flowing into the pockets of violent drug cartels.
• Inflation has been cut sharply from Biden levels.
• Crime rates across the country are much lower, with murder rates at a 70-year low.
• Capital has poured into the US in job-creating investment, and no advanced country has generated greater economic growth.
• The country has been liberated from climate theater without abandoning environmental protection.
• Syria, Venezuela, Cuba, and Iran have all been stripped of their usefulness as Russo-Chinese allies.
• The Iranian regime is being strangled (and its terrorist proxies with it) at almost no cost in American lives and only slight use of American ordnance. Despite the shrill mantra of the more radical isolationists, Trump kept his word: no forever war, no Iraq 2.0.
• Along with the Abrahamic Accords, Board of Peace and other diplomatic initiatives, despite current tensions, the scaffolding for future peace in the Middle East is the strongest it has been in decades.
• NATO has been reformed from a ragtag of slackers into a self-financing alliance.
• Ukraine has been armed to the point that Russia is fighting a war it looks increasingly unable to win, and the Russians have been forced to import gasoline and diesel for the first time in a generation because of its hobbled oil refining capacity.
This is one of the most persuasive lists of accomplishments of any two-term president since Theodore Roosevelt in 1906.
That a president with this strong a record can still have such a low approval rating is unprecedented and owes to one of his greatest short-comings – the messaging problem. President Trump can draw a crowd and dazzle his supporters like no president since FDR. What he has not yet been able to manage effectively, is use a direct Oval Office address, with a nonpartisan tone, to outline the national interest and ask for the support of the American people for his worthy objectives. Perhaps he is keeping his powder dry. If so, this is the month to use it.
This is how you write a letter to dumb leftist politicians. 👏👏👏
In her latest sciolistic letter to me, @SenWarren made it clear that she knows even less about foreign exchange markets than she does about banking.
What is equally shocking, but not surprising: not a single member of the media mob has a rudimentary-enough level of financial market literacy to spot her remedial error.
To reiterate: under @POTUS, the United States delivers for America’s trusted partners.
For a fuller explanation, I recommend Senator Warren take any entry level course in international finance for her and her staff, or I can personally give her a tutorial on Foreign Exchange for Dummies. Although I am not holding my breath, I hope her next letter will demonstrate that she has learned the difference between a currency purchase and a swap or a loan.
😂😂😂
I just choked on my drink whilst reading…
“Cultures that accept gay people as equal citizens are superior to those that throw gays off roof-tops as a form of gravity based conversion therapy.” — @GadSaad
Clarkson, and Lisa, are good people.
The farming industry thought Jeremy Clarkson was a tourist. The press decided he was a tax dodger.
In June, Cereals, the flagship arable trade show in Britain, was held on his farm. Over 700 exhibitors. Around 25,000 people from the industry.
They brought their own biggest event to his field.
The tax accusation is fair enough as far as it goes. He told The Times that avoiding inheritance tax was the critical thing when he bought land, and he has never once denied it.
Then he farmed it himself from 2019, badly, on camera.
Cleared £144 in year one. Lost money by year six. Opened a shop and was refused a car park. Built a restaurant and got an enforcement notice with six weeks to undo it. Fought two planning appeals and lost most of them.
Bought pigs and lost a litter. Went down with TB and shut the farm for seven months. Opened a pub that only serves British produce and absorbs 56p on every sausage. Left 200 acres bare this year because growing wheat was a guaranteed loss.
Every bit of it filmed and broadcast to fourteen million people.
Then the platform in Westminster with 13,000 farmers behind him. Permitted development rewritten in May 2024, nicknamed Clarkson's Clause. Cited twice in the House of Commons as evidence. Waitrose British sirloin up 193 percent. Agricultural degree applications climbing.
And years of being called a rich prat with a Range Rover for the trouble.
As a plan for quietly sheltering money, it is one of the worst ever attempted. Nobody protecting a tax break spends six years telling the country that farms make nothing, and nobody sane draws two Secretaries of State towards the exact relief he is relying on.
Farmland was a shelter because it does not earn. Nothing gives you a return and a tax break at the same time. The relief existed precisely because the return did not.
He bought a thousand acres for the shelter, discovered on camera why the shelter was there, and then told everybody.
The industry has stopped calling him a tourist.
It holds its trade shows in his field now.
The true cost of diversity above honour.
A dumbed down civilization where the most noticeable trait is incompetence at every level.
Since Jason Arday, I’ve been thinking about getting into Cambridge, and what it meant.
The culmination of years of headbanging hard work. Being a “swot” at school because I handed in homework instead of being popular. Yes, in a comprehensive the choice was that stark.
Carrying Tesco’s bags full of books home from the library on the bus for weeks. Piling the books high to create a rampart around my single bed.
Telling myself, “If you read all those books you’ll be good enough to get in.”
Some of the books I read - all of Graham Greene - were not considered “literature”. Not of the first rank, dear. I didn’t know.
As much Shakespeare as I could pack in - the big 4 Tragedies, all of the comedies. All of Austen, Forster (even Maurice FFS), lots of Dickens, Anna Karenina (devastating, wonderful).
I stopped going to school because I needed to read more, much much more. To be good enough to get in.
The Head of Sixth Form summoned me and said, “If you carry on like this you’ll fail your A levels.”
Ha! She hadn’t got a clue. I was working so far beyond A levels. Besides, I had to finish all the books in the rampart. Time was running out.
So hard, the entrance papers. Translating Proust into English. How?
Then, a passage of George Eliot I recognised - thank you God! Then pretending that I’d read Oliver Twist when I’d only seen the film. I called it Oliver! in my essay. With an exclamation mark - how crass. But the dons didn’t know the musical, maybe. I don’t know.
The only lie I told to get into Cambridge. Oliver! “All we ever get is groo-ell!” A really small, forgivable lie, I think, because the work of becoming good enough was so immense, so lonely.
But the surge of pride when I made it. Good enough to get into that unattainable place.
And now, we know that same Cambridge let in someone with two GCSEs - PE and textiles. A man who lied and lied and lied.
They didn’t just let Jason Arday in, they made him a Professor, one of those scholars kids like me revered. We were in awe - imagine being taught by those great minds.
Christ, Cambridge. What a betrayal of all of us who strove so hard to be good enough to deserve you. Who put you on a pedestal, who really truly thought reading hundreds of books was the price of admission, a price you willingly paid.
So much for the brightest and the best. It’s so disgusting on every level, waving in someone utterly unworthy, barely literate for crying out loud. A man at the mercy of the English language, not its master and commander.
A know-nothing Professor, a vacuous, fashionable fraudster hired to give lectures to kids like me.
So Cambridge could look “diverse” and, in so doing, renounced its ancient power which made so many like me strive to be good enough.
Peter retweeted
If you watched Trump's speech tonight and you still choose to bellyache about nothing happening, I don't want to hear it.
It's now undeniably crystal clear that a massive takedown is well underway regarding election security, and it involves both hostile foreign interests and officials here in the US that they were working with.
Now, add in having Comey and Brennan under active grand jury investigations in Florida, and we're absolutely cooking.
Note that subpoenas were just issued to individuals such as Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, Lisa Monaco, etc., as those two cases necessarily expand. It's similarly clear those investigations are set to take off as the entire Russiagate house of cards is coming down... in parallel with all the election fraud and collaboration with our enemies.
There's even more going down, a lot more, but for the sake of brevity, know that what's clear is that this will only get worse for the right people from here on out. Take it to the bank. Lots of folks are going to prison.
And if you still can't see it at this point, you're either still brainwashed, an idiot, and/or complicit in some capacity, even if that means simply choosing to ignore weighing all the new or recently discovered evidence with an open mind.
This is happening.
All of it.
This is true of every leftist performing, rather than living, morality. Disgusting people.
You are a disgusting, conceited, condescending, morbidly obese misogynist who was horrible to a great woman who had just been murdered.
Why has @SkyNews not fired you?
Peter retweeted
Everyone today criticising Ann Widdecombe for having deeply held Christian values would never say a word about Islam
Cowards, all of them.
Inspired by the indominatable @WhatNowDoc and @IchiCooPark, I plucked up the courage, went to the far end of my yard, and turned this:


























