Football handicapper
Joined March 2022
- Tweets24.4K
- Following627
- Followers715
- Likes70.6K
She was recorded as female because she's female.
A male and a female = heterosexual.
It'd be great if you dildos remembered your own distinction between GeNdEr and sex; but then, with that flag and hammer-and-sickle, you're one of those beyond hope of critical reasoning.
unavailable
This male "lesbian" started a thread asserting that actual women "short-circuit" when faced with his arguments; so of course, he was soon accusing everyone of being bots and/or retards and blocking away.
Do report his post about us all killing ourselves too, while you're there.
1) No one is doing anything more than a buccal swab
2) Such verification wouldn't be necessary at all if idiots like you weren't so adamant about males self-identifying into female sports categories
Nickel Bets retweeted
A lot of us were very willing to have a debate without heat, @stonewalluk, and the reason that never happened wasn't because gender critical feminists didn't want one.
While we were trying to get you to listen to our concerns, your former CEO was telling a BBC boss that gay people not wanting to include the opposite sex in their dating pool was 'sexual racism'. While we were pointing out the homophobia inherent in gender ideology, Stonewall ambassador Alex Drummond (a bearded, heterosexual man who'd had no surgery and taken no cross-sex hormones but liked wearing skirts), was going into schools to talk to students about his 'lesbian' identity. @BluskyeAllison, who actually is a lesbian, was subject to unlawful discrimination at her place of work for tweeting: ‘Stonewall recently hired Morgan Page, a male bodied person who ran workshops with the sole aim of coaching heterosexual men who identify as lesbians on how they can coerce young lesbians into having sex with them. Page called [it] “overcoming the cotton ceiling”.’
When the UK Supreme Court upheld women's right to single sex spaces, you issued a statement expressing your unhappiness about the ruling. In her report on your unhappy influence at the University of Essex, you were found by barrister @akuareindorf to have misrepresented the law as it related to women's rights: '[Stonewall have] stated the law as Stonewall would prefer it to be, rather than the law as it is’.
In 2018, you publicly advised schools to shred a research pack saying there were risks to puberty blockers, in spite of the fact that you aren't a medical charity and that there was already credible evidence that puberty blockers are neither irreversible nor harm-free. Meanwhile you produced your own educational packs, recommending a children's book, for ages 5-9, in which the parent 'is neither a man, nor a woman – they’re non-binary.' In July 2022, Stonewall sent out a tweet that read ‘Research suggests that children as young as two recognise their trans identity'.
@thetimes has reported how you've sought to control the language used by NHS trusts and government on their social-media accounts. Organisations would get points from you for replacing commonly understood words with ideologically approved terms, eg, 'birthing parent' instead of 'mother'. thetimes.com/uk/society/arti…
In short, you took a maximalist position on gender identity ideology, which you attempted to enforce by diktat. You refused to acknowledge that you'd hitched your wagon to a cause that, unlike civil rights, gay rights or women's rights, sought to strip rights from others. You sought to curtail everyone's right to freedom of speech and belief by controlling what it was permissible to think and say, through the management and political class. You have argued against women's and girl's rights to their own spaces, their sports and to assemble without men. Your former CEO tried to shame gay women/men into dating the opposite sex if the latter claimed to be female/male.
Your mantra was 'no debate' because, like all totalitarians, you preferred slogans, bullying and infiltration of powerful institutions to talking to opponents. You appear to have had no concern for the lowly people your ideology was harming: gender confused kids, female rape victims, female prisoners, regular people hounded and investigated at their places of work for refusing to accept the new mandates on sex and gender issued from on high.
Your 'activism' has been a disaster for those trans-identified people who really do just want to get on with their lives in peace. You have besmirched the name of an organisation many of us were once proud to donate to, the charity that was partly responsible for securing the legal right of gay people to marry, which a lot of us thought would never happen in our lifetimes. The milquetoast words quoted below do not erase a decade of gender activism that has been disastrous not only for individuals but for society as a whole.
There was once a debate to be had, but until you acknowledge the direct harm you've caused, it is no more possible to debate you than to persuade a person in the throes of a drug-induced psychosis that they are not, in fact, the reincarnated Christ.
Nickel Bets retweeted
This apology from disability charity Scope, for cancelling my choir’s London Marathon performance because of my gender-critical views, is required to stay on its website for seven days.
Today is Day 6.
Women don’t always get the apologies they deserve. So I’d be grateful if you could help make sure this one is seen by sharing it over the next 24 hours (link below). 🙏
Thanks again to @SpeechUnion for supporting my legal case and helping secure this apology.
Nickel Bets retweeted
xitter.cf/MrAndyNgo/status/21149…
I'll tweet it out now.
1.) There is no definition of a "trans person" other than "someone who claims to be the sex they are not."
"Being trans" requires no psychological gatekeeping on principle; indeed, the practice of differential diagnosis has given way to its opposite, compelled affirmation by any and all, including "medical professionals" whose duty is to accept any person's claim to be the sex they are not, and start them on a course of hormonal interventions with volatile effects on cognition and mood if the person requests it.
2.) Transgender identities have always been mentally comorbid with other mood and personality disorders and sexual paraphilias (which cluster). There is a high incidence of autism, depression, anxiety, disordered eating and cutting in this mentally comorbid cohort, along with suicidal ideation.
3.) Transgender identities are rebellious and oppositional adolescent postures that naturally attract troubled and disaffected children with identity issues. Indeed, rather than being seen by clinicians as the product of other comorbidities, wherever it is claimed, "minority stress" becomes the favored explanation for all other comorbidities, with social affirmation and gender medicalization being prioritized, leaving other diagnoses and treatments for the underlying distress that manifests as trans identity unaddressed. Trans identification piles atop all these unaddressed problems, the inherent stresses and difficulties of making your self-esteem radically dependent on others accepting you as something you are not, making daily life a gauntlet of humiliations for the vast majority of trans identified people who do not pass as the sex they are not.
4.) Adopting a transgender identity comes with a host of social and political privileges and immunities; you acquire the right to violate sex-based boundaries based on a claim to be something you are not; you obtain deference to imperious demands that other people affirm an inner conception of yourself that you claim to have. It's a great tool to bully and control other people and a great way to extract special treatment either compelled by law or offered voluntarily by believers in transgender dogmas and therefore exerts a gravitational pull not just on fragile narcissists seeking to buttress a weak and dissociated sense of self but also on malignant narcissists and psychopaths who will flow toward social affordance that grants them power over others.
5.) The movement relies on emotional blackmail and threats of suicide in the first instance -- when parents are told that failure to consent to transgender medicalization presents a virtual certainty of suicide -- and relies on hysterical, histrionic, hyperbole claims to create ingroup solidarity through a compelling LARP and to extract further tribute from the political apparatus in thrall to them. Transgender ideologues routinely equate excluding men from women's volleyball teams or domestic violence shelters or accurate verbal references to the material fact of a person's sex with "genocide," thereby teaching troubled and mentally comorbid young people that mass violence is self-defense against genocide.
The photo on the left is of two of one of two film director brothers who began claiming to be women after immersion in transgender porn and BDSM subcultures claiming that JK Rowling's exclusion of men from a women's domestic violence shelter is genocidal. The photo on the right is of an 18-year old who had been affirmed as a "girl" since the age of 12, an intervention purported to protect him against the risk of suicide, who murdered his murder and brother and six people at a middle school in a rural town in British Columbia.
The photo of him posing with a gun with a trans flag wrapped around its muzzle was sent right before his murder rampage to another trans-identified male in the US, who egged him on in reply, who has been charged as a co-conspirator in the murder. US prosecutors released the photo which Canadian police hid. Canadian media continues to refer to both the mass murderer and his accomplice as "women," honoring the gender identities of two male "partners in crime," since affirming transgender identities takes priority over providing a factual account of who the murderers of Canadian children actually are.
The DOJ is seeking research grant applications from scholars wanting to research what’s behind the rise in violence from trans-identified people. There have been many killings and threats of m—rder from that small demographic. thepostmillennial.com/doj-of…
Nickel Bets retweeted
PREMIERING NOV 5th
The debate we’re not supposed to have!
whodecidesfilm.com
#Auspol #WhoDecidesFilm
Nickel Bets retweeted
My god they're so fucking close to realizing that nobody cares if you're trans or queer. It's when it's aggressively force fed to you.
In Veilguard you're literally condemning yourself to the bad ending by not doing the gay shit, in BG3 it's entirely optional and you have to actively pursue it for it to come up.
It's the same thing with movies, don't expect a bunch of straight dudes to go watch a movie about a gay romance. There's nothing wrong with that. I don't expect a bunch of gay dudes to run out and see movies about heterosexual romance.
The problem is, If you make a game with a bunch of gay shit in it, and the game depends on sales numbers from straight dudes for it to be successful and not lose a billion dollars, then you're unfortunately going to run into a situation where you have to close the studio and fire everyone because you're completely fucking braindead.
Understanding your audience and demographics is like marketing 101, but game devs have decided that shit doesn't matter because this sort of content is what they have decided people "should" want.
It's activism, plain and simple. The games industry is absolutely saturated with people who are trying to use it as a political platform for progressivism
Nickel Bets retweeted
ERASED.
Tasmania's Conversion Practices Prohibition Bill deletes "homosexuality", "bisexuality" and "heterosexuality" from the Anti-Discrimination Act, and replaces them with attraction to a "gender".
The bill doesn't say what gender means.
buff.ly/8vDpYQS
The Inmates Run the Asylum at the Psychological Association | Colin Wright and Andrew Hartz
wsj.com/opinion/the-inmates-…
The picture in question was a troon touching the hand of an infant child while the mother isn't looking.
Nickel Bets retweeted
WOW. Holy shit. The best response to Palestinian bullshit ever.
Meticulous. Masterclass by @benshapiro
You’ve gotta watch this
Nickel Bets retweeted
Having watched the TRIGGERnometry episode with Owen Jones, it seems clear what Konstantin is trying to do. He wants to have constructive conversations with woke Marxists to see if common ground can be found. It's admirable, but futile.
I spent a decade on the boards of The Guardian and the BBC trying to engage with these people, understand them, see if there was any way we could negotiate or compromise, and what I learned was that there's just no point.
It's not that we disagree with each other. It's that we exist on entirely different plains of reality.
They think men can get pregnant. They think random Somalians are English. They think Charlie Kirk getting shot is a cause of celebration. They think importing third world rapists is an acceptable trade off for being able to call your society "multicultural." They think that whiteness is evil, capitalism is a sin, the West must be destroyed, Islam is awesome, non-whites cultures are superior, and that mentally vulnerable teenagers should be sterilised and their genitals mutilated.
No amount of discussion with an indoctrinated woke Marxist ideologue is going to convince me that I should become one or that they should stop being one. Our perspectives are so diametrically opposed that we may as well be a different species.
Furthermore, I don't simply think that they're wrong. I think they're evil. Actively evil, and that the damage they cause is catastrophic and unforgivable. I don't want to find common ground with them anymore. I'm no longer interested in trying to understand them. I don't want to talk to them, I don't want to engage with them, I don't want to see them.
I don't care why Owen Jones thinks Hugo Chavez isn't a dictator or why he thinks importing Afghani's statistically far more likely to rape women than native Britons are is acceptable.
We should spend a lot less time trying to win them over or convince them that they're wrong, and a lot more time deciding amongst ourselves how we're going to fix the dire situation we find ourselves in.
Nickel Bets retweeted
Just remember the reason Jew haters are permitted to march through British cities as often as they do is because the Home Office allows it. And it’s highly likely a lot of Home Office staff agree with the hate marchers. As do a fair number of Labour MPs.
If you doubt this, imagine the Home Office permitting open hatred expressed towards any other minority…