The Network Law Review has a new design. Each theme is now a constellation in which every star is a publication, and each article draws the network of work it connects to. Twelve themes to explore, and a lot more to find along the way. networklawreview.org

Not all network effects are red flags for merger scrutiny. Johannes Johnen and @ShivaShekhar_08 show how product-specific effects strengthen incentives to foreclose, while ecosystem-specific effects can weaken them. networklawreview.org/types-n…

Thibault Schrepel’s reading suggestions for September. What acquirers actually keep when they buy a startup, causation in monopolization cases, the economics of recursive self-improvement, why AI detection cannot work, and the university after AI. networklawreview.org/septemb….

What if firms design acquisitions less around what they want to kill and more around what they want to keep? In a new paper, Selcukhan Ünekbas studies "keeper acquisitions" and tracks what GAFAM retained across 364 acquisitions. networklawreview.org/keeper-…

The Minerva Papers, a new series by Jorge Padilla, opens today. Paper #1, “Dominance in Motion,” proposes a structured R&D-intensity test. A market share records who is ahead, not how hard that firm must work to stay ahead. networklawreview.org/dominan…

New series in the Network Law Review: The Minerva Papers, by Jorge Padilla (@CompassLexecon). Concept note is up. It is delightful, a must read. networklawreview.org/minerva… First essay tomorrow.

Here are @ProfSchrepel’s reading suggestions for August. Why breakup remedies rarely restore competition, confirmation bias in LLM pricing recommendations, whether Europe can scale, the wisdom of crowds in markets... networklawreview.org/august-…

If antitrust protects competition -not individual trading partners- when should economic dependence trigger intervention, and how does it differ from abuse of dominance? @GiuColangelo draws on transaction cost economics: it's about hold-up, not fairness. networklawreview.org/superio…

🎶Somewhere over the rainbow🎶 What improvements should make the final cut for the new Merger Guidelines? Jorge Padilla sets out the reforms he dreams of seeing: preserving skepticism and rigour, while rethinking the order and discipline of the analysis networklawreview.org/draft-m…

The end of net neutrality? Daniel Spulber argues that recent court decisions have effectively ended the FCC's net neutrality regulation, which will encourage investment, innovation, and support the continued expansion of e-commerce networklawreview.org/farewel…

This month’s reading suggestions from @profschrepel. Inside: an LLM that predicts case outcomes, the fight over public ownership of the big AI labs, and whether you can tell when AI wrote the article. Plus Pinker on common knowledge. networklawreview.org/june-20…

Each month, the Network Law Review publishes curated reading lists selecting the most relevant new papers in antitrust, AI, and tech policy. Combined with case-law tracking across jurisdictions, it becomes a real working tool. Subscribe ➝ networklawreview.org/subscri… (it's free)

🎉 Celebrating the 10th issue of Antitrust Antidote! @kwongervin, Jeremy Kauffman, Jeremy Sandford, and Nathan Wilson share everything you need to know on US antitrust from April–June 2026: from the Nexstar-Tegna merger fight to Phhhoto v. Meta and beyond networklawreview.org/antidot…

In memoriam: Marius Schwartz (@Georgetown) In tribute to Marius, we are republishing the article today. We extend our deepest condolences to his family, to Yongmin Chen, and to his many colleagues and friends. networklawreview.org/default…

📚 Our Editor-in-Chief @ProfSchrepel shares his May reading suggestions: rugged landscapes & competition policy, populist antitrust’s error costs, the data-center water debate, EU AI-compute sovereignty, blockchain governance & more. networklawreview.org/may-202…

What if the most important innovations of the next decade aren’t in technology, but in institutions themselves? @profjasonpotts thinks they are. Come and listen to his provocative talk on i/acc. Live talk + Q&A with @profSchrepel 👇 alti.amsterdam/event/jason-p…

Firms innovate not along a smooth path but on “rugged technological landscapes”, balancing risky frontier breakthroughs against niche innovation. This has implications for competition policy, as argued by Professors Callander, Lambert, and Matouschek. networklawreview.org/rugged-…

Looking for a reliable way to track antitrust case law across jurisdictions? The Network Law Review runs dedicated series covering the U.S., Europe, and Latin America. No equivalent resource brings this together in one place. Subscribe ➝ networklawreview.org/subscri… (it's free)

Catch up on Latin American antitrust news in the new Chronicles: digital markets regulation, Apple’s iOS settlement, and institutional reform in Argentina and Mexico, written by Carlos Ragazzo, @aboutmattiuzzo, Bruna Cataldo, and Clara Duarte Late networklawreview.org/latin-a…

📚 April 2026 reading suggestions are out. AI agents meet complexity economics. The waterbed effect collapses. The AI moat wobbles. Europe drifts into American dependence. Hayek’s papers go online. Barabási on networks. By @ProfSchrepel 👇 networklawreview.org/april-2….