Defi Farmer. De/TR

Germany
Joined October 2023
In Germany, there are many "ghost" apartments where large numbers of Ukrainians register for welfare payments, while having moved to another EU state, where they receive other benefits, or home. Remarkably, Ukrainian "Refugees" are free to travel back to Ukraine at will, to "visit family" or get medical care. No restrictions.
176
1,754
107
5,852
219,999
RAPE ONLY EXISTS IN NORWAY BECAUSE OF MIGRANTS. 100% OF RAPE CASES. REMIGRATION NOW!
125
3,511
58
29,817
223,559
Dear Secretary Bessent @SecScottBessent, My name is Everett Stern. In 2010 I was a compliance officer at @HSBC. From a back office in New Castle, Delaware, I watched billions of dollars move to drug cartels, sanctioned regimes, and terrorist organizations. The enemies of the United States. I documented it, I escalated it, and when the bank would not act, I took it to the @FBI, the @CIA, and eventually the @SECGov. The result was a $1.92 billion settlement. At the time, it was one of the largest in American history. It was also about five weeks of the bank’s profit. Not one banker was charged. Not one went to prison. I paid a different price. I lost my career, my savings, and my place in the industry I had trained for. I was blacklisted. Every door in American finance closed at once. I slept on a camping cot in a 300 square foot apartment because I could not afford a bed, and I waited tables at @PFChangs to eat. I tell you this not for sympathy, but so you understand that I know exactly what it costs to do the right thing in American finance, and exactly how little the system does in return. I made that sacrifice because I believed it would change something. Yesterday, your department fined @BankofAmerica $1.2 billion for failing to report more than $5 billion in suspicious transactions, some of it tied by your own findings to Chinese laundering networks, narcotics, and the southwest border, alongside 475 apparent sanctions violations touching Russia, Iran, and global terrorism. The bank admitted it willfully violated the Bank Secrecy Act. Fourteen years after HSBC. A bank with “America” in its name. And once again, not one individual charged. Secretary Bessent, I want to say plainly what I believe you already know. The fines are not working. A fine is paid by shareholders, absorbed by the balance sheet, and forgotten by the next earnings call. Bank of America reported earnings this morning. Nobody who set the alert thresholds, nobody who decided the 2024 cease and desist could wait, nobody who chose the backlog over the law will lose a single thing they value. Their lives are untouched. That is the entire reason the behavior repeats. This is money laundering. This is blood money. Money that reaches a cartel buys fentanyl that kills Americans. Money that reaches a terrorist organization buys the next attack. This country has fought a war on drugs and a war on terror for decades, at enormous cost in lives and treasure, and all the while we have allowed the financing to flow through institutions we charter and regulate. Cut off the money and we win. We have never seriously tried. There is also a question of equal justice that I cannot let go. Before I walked into the FBI building to report HSBC, I stopped in front of the Great Seal on the wall and read the words engraved beneath it: “Justice is the defense of our liberty.” I believed that. I still want to. But every day in this country, people go to prison for crimes that are nothing next to moving money for the people who want Americans dead. A suit, a title, and a corporate badge should not be a shield from the consequences that apply to everyone else. If a street dealer goes to prison for what he sells, the banker who moved the cartel’s money should be standing next to him. I also want to raise something that is rarely said in these conversations. Why has no one inside Bank of America come forward the way I did? The answer is that everyone in American banking knows what happened to me, and to the whistleblowers who came after. The last person who spoke up is the only policy anyone believes. That is a culture problem, and it starts with leadership, in the banks and in the agencies that regulate them. This is not a political issue. It has spanned administrations of both parties. It is a national security issue, and I am asking you to treat it as one. Three things would change the math overnight. Refer individuals for criminal prosecution. Not the analyst in the queue. The executives who set the thresholds and chose the risk. One banker in handcuffs would do more than every fine in Treasury’s history combined. End “too big to jail.” An institution cannot be too big to fail and too big to jail at the same time. If it is the first, it must be held to a higher standard, not a lower one. And if Bank of America will not act as America’s bank, review its charter. A national charter is a privilege granted on behalf of the American people. It should be conditioned on not moving money for the people trying to kill them. Secretary Bessent, you said yesterday that these actions send a clear message that even the biggest institutions are not above the law. With respect, the institution was never the problem. The people inside it are above the law, and they know it. Until that changes, I will keep writing letters like this one, and the next bank will keep paying the next fine. I gave up everything I had to stop this. I am asking you to use the power you have to finish it. Respectfully, Everett A. Stern HSBC Whistleblower Founder and Intelligence Director, Tactical Rabbit
3,173
30,548
2,525
94,519
3,697,493
Ukrainians bought €2,000,000,000 (BILLION) of real estate in Spain in 2026 (Spanish Notaries Council). Spain gave Ukraine €2.7 BILLION in 2022-2025. And €2 BILLION of it went straight into Spanish villas. Not bad.
562
5,481
416
16,726
483,978
If Bitcoin accepts back below the range, then Q4 2026 could shape up to be what it historically has been. The markets always have a way of convincing us that "this time is different."
A lot of people interpreted this post in many different ways. I did not realize it would be viewed almost 4M times and that it would end up being one of my most liked posts on this platform, so I wanted to expand on it a bit. If you watched any of my recent videos, all of what I'm about to say are things you have already heard. I think admitting when we are wrong about something is important, as it helps us grow as investors and hopefully allows us to make fewer mistakes in the future. It also communicates to those who choose to listen to our views that we recognize we are fallible. Pretending to be right about everything is silly, and gaslighting an audience by saying "exactly as predicted" about everything is exhausting and not representative of the truth. I also really appreciate all the support many of you showed. It genuinely means a lot. My goal in being on here has always been to help people navigate markets, so when I get something wrong, I think it is important to acknowledge it rather than pretend it did not happen. Since many people took the original post to mean different things, I wanted to clarify what I was actually admitting I was wrong about. Specifically, my post was about Bitcoin taking out the May high, which I had repeatedly said I did not think would happen. If I spend two months saying something is unlikely to happen, and then it happens, I cannot sit here and pretend like I was calling for it when I wasn't. Because of that, I felt I needed to acknowledge that I was wrong. I wish I had not been as deterministic, and that I had been more open-minded to the possibility of a higher high. I should hold myself accountable for my views by admitting when I get things wrong. But that is all my post was meant to convey. Some of the narratives that have developed from that post are not fully representative of my views. Bitcoin is still operating under a difficult macro backdrop that has caused it to underperform other markets for years. Until liquidity conditions improve, I think that relative underperformance could remain an issue. That does not mean Bitcoin cannot have rallies or bull markets, but it could mean that the gains are not as significant as they were during periods when liquidity was more free-flowing. Being wrong about the May high also does not automatically mean that I relinquish every other view I have expressed. I have discussed the possibility of Q4 2026 weakness since Q4 2025. With one week left before Q4 begins, I do not think Bitcoin making a higher high means I should suddenly pretend that view never existed. What it does mean is that I should be less deterministic about it and more willing to change my view as new information comes in. As long as Bitcoin remains above the May high, I have to respect the breakout. Continued acceptance above the range highs would increasingly challenge my broader bear market thesis, which I have honestly had a hard time letting go of. If Bitcoin instead closes a weekly candle back below the May high, then I think weakness into Q4 remains possible. Even then, the fact that Bitcoin already made a higher high could change what that weakness ultimately looks like. Q4 weakness would not necessarily require a new low. And importantly, if Bitcoin does show weakness in Q4, it does not change the fact that I was wrong about what Bitcoin already accomplished in Q3. I would rather use that experience to hopefully become a better investor than pretend it did not happen. The part I am still struggling to reconcile is the macro backdrop. Long-end yields have continued to rise, alongside the dollar and energy. I would normally expect that combination to eventually pressure long-duration assets like crypto. I do not fully understand Bitcoin's move to $87K from a macro perspective, but I can understand it from a technical analysis perspective (golden cross, RSI, etc.) That disconnect is part of why I have taken a step back and decided to be less deterministic. Continued acceptance above the range highs will force me to reconsider parts of my framework. A move back below them would make me more interested in the Q4 weakness thesis again. It is difficult for me to reconcile rising yields, DXY and energy with a sustained bullish Bitcoin move, especially going into Q4 of a midterm year, when Bitcoin has historically experienced significant weakness. But the market does not have to conform to my expectations. My goal going forward is to be more open to different outcomes, more critical of myself when communicating strongly held views, and more humble in my approach to markets. I am a student of the market, and I do not have a crystal ball. It's about time to see what Q4 has in store!
561
236
86
4,395
1,063,752
CHARLOTTE RESIDENTS, BEWARE Diquan Shafar Hunt (14 prior arrests) is on the loose, filming himself attacking white women Please spread this info
2,074
12,613
696
57,301
4,986,708
Call the Democrat Senators Tell them If they vote against Clarity Act You will vote against them at midterms Angela Alsobrooks (MD) — (202) 224-4524 Tammy Baldwin (WI) — (202) 224-5653 Michael Bennet (CO) — (202) 224-5852 Richard Blumenthal (CT) — (202) 224-2823 Lisa Blunt Rochester (DE) — (202) 224-2441 Cory Booker (NJ) — (202) 224-3224 Maria Cantwell (WA) — (202) 224-3441 Ben Cardin (MD) — (202) 224-4524 Tom Carper (DE) — (202) 224-2441 Chris Coons (DE) — (202) 224-5042 Catherine Cortez Masto (NV) — (202) 224-3542 Tammy Duckworth (IL) — (202) 224-2854 Dick Durbin (IL) — (202) 224-2152 John Fetterman (PA) — (202) 224-4254 Kirsten Gillibrand (NY) — (202) 224-4451 Maggie Hassan (NH) — (202) 224-3324 Martin Heinrich (NM) — (202) 224-5521 John Hickenlooper (CO) — (202) 224-5941 Mazie Hirono (HI) — (202) 224-6361 Tim Kaine (VA) — (202) 224-4024 Andy Kim (NJ) — (202) 224-4744 Amy Klobuchar (MN) — (202) 224-3244 Ben Ray Luján (NM) — (202) 224-6621 Ed Markey (MA) — (202) 224-2742 Jeff Merkley (OR) — (202) 224-3753 Chris Murphy (CT) — (202) 224-4041 Patty Murray (WA) — (202) 224-2621 Alex Padilla (CA) — (202) 224-3553 Gary Peters (MI) — (202) 224-6221 Jack Reed (RI) — (202) 224-4642 Jacky Rosen (NV) — (202) 224-6244 Brian Schatz (HI) — (202) 224-3934 Chuck Schumer (NY) — (202) 224-6542 Jeanne Shaheen (NH) — (202) 224-2841 Elissa Slotkin (MI) — (202) 224-4822 Tina Smith (MN) — (202) 224-5641 Adam Schiff (CA) — (202) 224-3841 Raphael Warnock (GA) — (202) 224-3643 Mark Warner (VA) — (202) 224-2023 Elizabeth Warren (MA) — (202) 224-4543 Sheldon Whitehouse (RI) — (202) 224-2921 Ron Wyden (OR) — (202) 224-5244 Jon Ossoff (GA) — (202) 224-3521 Ruben Gallego (AZ) — (202) 224-4521 Ruben? (45th seat varies with current membership updates)
41
194
11
666
16,102
Let’s help the Senate to make this happen Please contact your Senator’s office and voice your support for this vote
I believe we will get a vote on the Clarity Act before August recess and get people on the record after 11 months of negotiating with Democrats and adding 300+ pages to the bill at their request. It's just time to get people on the record.
78
224
4
1,949
105,143
Antalyaya Rus belasını saran da bu adam.
Replying to @burada_1283
mevlüt çavuşoğlunun hırtları alanyaya el koymuş durumdalar.. torosların tepelerine kadar ormanları üzerlerine geçirdiler..
9
106
1,945
119,236
Antalya'da bir Rus turistin 80 daire satın aldığı ve aldığı daireleri yalnıza yurttaşlarına kiraladığı ortaya çıktı.
341
640
113
6,776
471,352
WE WILL HOLD ALL US SENATORS ACCOUNTABLE FOR NOT PASSING THE CLARITY ACT IN THE MID-TERM ELECTION IN NOVEMBER.. 🇺🇸 🗳 YOU SAY NO TO CLARITY ACT.. WE SAY NO TO YOU.. ✅️ FAIR? WE, THE AMERICAN TAXPAYERS.. 🇺🇸 @SenateGOP @SenateDems @LeaderJohnThune 🇺🇸
144
779
32
3,157
85,511
IF WE CAN PUT YOU IN OFFICE.. WE COULD REMOVE YOU.. 🗳 🚪 Just a reminder to all the US Senators who are anti-crypto and clarity act.. 📃 🇺🇸 @SenateGOP @SenateDems @LeaderJohnThune @SenWarren @Sen_Alsobrooks @SenRubenGallego @SenAdamSchiff @SenAlexPadilla 🇺🇸
47
228
10
784
11,149
🚨UPDATE: These Senators OPPOSE the CLARITY ACT. They are blocking America’s chance to lead the future of crypto. While China and Russia push ahead, these senators stall, delay, and weaken U.S. innovation. Enough is enough. PASS THE CLARITY ACT NOW! 🇺🇸
134
665
47
1,532
53,075
Here is the list of all US Senators who are up for re-election in this November.. 🇺🇸 🗳 If any of these Senators say no to Clarity Act, we SAY NO to them.. 🚪
93
757
29
2,290
34,749
🇺🇸 LIST OF SENATORS OPPOSING THE CLARITY ACT: WITHOUT THE CLARITY ACT, AMERICA WON’T BECOME THE CRYPTO CAPITAL OF THE WORLD ❌ WE NEED CLARITY! 🚀
336
1,401
86
3,475
91,394
These are the Senators who aren’t interested in being reelected @Sen_Alsobrooks @CoryBooker @SenCortezMasto @RubenGallego @Hickenlooper @MarkWarner @ReverendWarnock we welcome you all back into the private sector if you don’t pass the Clarity Act. Welcome to the real world. It’s a jungle out here. I can assure you it’s not worth it. We actually have to work. Pass it and continue to enjoy the government dole.
🚨NEW: A group of pro-crypto Democrats say they’re unhappy not only with the Clarity Act’s ethics provisions as they currently stand, but also with several other areas of the bill, including its illicit finance and conflicts of interest provisions. The bill’s path to 60 votes remains challenging.
64
311
19
826
57,845
Career suicide for Dems who vote ‘no’ on the Clarity Act.
🇺🇸JUST IN: Senator Cynthia Lummis says Democrats are blocking the CLARITY Act to get "a pound of flesh from President Trump". "They want State Attorneys General from another state to sue elected officials. Senators said we don't want that." Trump agreed to divest or use a blind trust, "somehow that's not enough."
68
196
10
1,170
27,067