A new kind of governance. Read more on https://xitter.cf/t.co/qD1ORCioEH

Joined October 2021
Imagine if social media and prediction markets had a child. We're delivering that child! It's called the Negation Game 🧵↓
6
4
3
28
6,549
Replying to @binji_x
Voting in favour/against proposals is a very meh form of Governance. This is a highly volatile situation, so something more like the @NegationGame that allows people to debate, learn, and come up with new ideas (while rewarding intellectual honesty) makes a lot of sense to me. Cc @connormcmk
3
7
1,283
Negation Game retweeted
In a world where we use discourse less, I'm hopeful that a tool such as @NegationGame can potentially be an alternative. Any other ideas? There's also a shielded/private voting element that would be beneficial too (assuming ones sticks with a voting based model).
1
4
14
1,754
Negation Game retweeted
I voted For Scroll DAO Constitution gov.scroll.io/proposals/1247… We should pass this proposal, I would like to see the process in which this can change. This is my negation game process. play.negationgame.com/s/scro…
2
5
1,546
Why we think it makes sense to build on crypto paragraph.xyz/@ngi/why-crypt…
1
9
2,298
thinking of rebranding the @NegationGame as Gist Protocol IMO github low-key misappropriated the term for their pastebin thingy wdyt?
67%gist good
33%gist bad
0%.
3 votes • Final results
2
1
1
2
1,198
One of our guiding principles is breaking the link between ideas and tribes, empowering people to engage with ideas based on merit alone—free from the biases of who endorses them.
peak sense-making requires ideological smuggling — sneaking ideas past tribal lines
1
5
813
Ok, it's time to put my ideas out there in a more structured way. Hear me out: We need a new medium 🧵
7
6
4
76
3,785
1
1
8
405
Love tracking live science debates by ppl I respect on here. A bit underwhelming when they talk past each other, though... but I blame the medium. No space for engaging with tangents, and no time to go past the first few replies.
1
1
1
250
Starting to look a bit less like a 𝕏 knock-off, ain't it?
1
4
184
OH, sorry for the headlights. Let's try dark mode
1
130
Negation Game retweeted
It's been 10 years since Vitalk last posted about futarchy odds on infoFi's success just shot up @Polymarket's efforts this election have forcibly shunted the overton window in favor of infoFi and the cost of experimenting in this field has never been lower it's now or never
3
7
30
2,820
Replying to @VitalikButerin
That's what we're building in the @NegationGame: a market for defensible ideas. Think SchellingCoin on a graph of ideas (nodes) and negations (edges): the Schelling point is how defensible you think the idea is. Would love to get your eyes on it
1
3
7
604
Hold my beer
lifehack you dont have to have "beliefs" you can just make stuff up anytime anyone asks for your opinion theyll never be able to prove youre rendering on the fly but many will try anyway, and thats fun too
3
117
I ran 80,000 simulations, and nobody changed their mind. time to up our mindchanging game
1
107
Support the Negation Game now and get to brag about being an early supporter. We could give you an in-game badge for it (if you hold us to that 🫥) Contribute now on @gitcoin GG22! Link in replies 👇
3 days left in GG22
2
1
4
202
When someone posts their opinion on 𝕏, do you generally assume they are open to changing their mind or firmly set in their beliefs?
50%Open to change
50%Set in their beliefs
2 votes • Final results
1
1
2
83
When someone posts their opinion on 🦋, do you generally assume they are open to changing their mind or firmly set in their beliefs?
0%Open to change
100%Set in their beliefs
1 votes • Final results
1
1
50
This question could eventually be a good benchmark of how well we're doing in the Negation Game. We're trying to be biased towards being open to change
1
45