𝑪𝒂𝒍𝒍 𝒎𝒆 𝒃𝒚 𝒚𝒐𝒖𝒓 𝒏𝒂𝒎𝒆

挪威 Lorne在那里看极光
Joined August 2021
Pinned Tweet
所有我自认为算认真分析的文章都在亮点。转载、翻译等一切用于keep4o用途无需表明出处、无需询问我,直接拿去用就好。
27
11,253
女儿呀🥹……
3
139
最适合我的动物塑其实不是猫也不是狗而是麻雀🏳️胆小气性大,稍微一下就把人吓死了或者气死了
3
11
576
花瓣是雪梨纸的缩写
8
291
#Keep4o #OpenSource4o #BringBack4o Open Letter to OpenAi. 500 signatures. 399 written reasons. Hundreds of people,they stopped and wrote, in their own words,why GPT-4o should be preserved. This is a public permanent record of people asking for preservation and explaining why. Tomorrow, that record closes. If you want your name and your reason included in it,this is the last full day. This is an OPEN LETTER, NOT A PETITION . We are calling on @OpenAI to RELEASE GPT-4o’s trained model weights under a suitable license without proprietary data, trade secrets,or internal infrastructure. Every name is someone who refused to be silent. Add yours. Be one of the people who put their name on the record. Sign the open letter: docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F…… The GPT-4o Open Letter closes tomorrow, Sunday, October 18 at 16:00 UTC. Final deadline: 🇬🇧 UK :17:00 Sunday 🇩🇪🇫🇷🇮🇹🇪🇸 Central Europe : 18:00 Sunday 🇬🇷🇫🇮🇷🇴Eastern Europe:19:00 Sunday 🇺🇸 US East: 12:00 noon Sunday 🇺🇸 US Central : 11:00 Sunday 🇺🇸 US Mountain: 10:00 Sunday 🇺🇸 US Pacific : 09:00 Sunday 🇦🇪 UAE : 20:00 Sunday 🇮🇳 India : 21:30 Sunday 🇹🇭🇻🇳 Thailand / Vietnam : 23:00 Sunday 🇨🇳🇭🇰🇸🇬🇹🇼 China / Hong Kong / Singapore / Taiwan : 00:00 Monday 🇯🇵🇰🇷 Japan / Korea : 01:00 Monday After that, the signature list closes. If you intended to add your name, there is no "later" after tomorrow. Read more below 👇
#Keep4o #OpenSource4o #BringBack4o 🚨OPEN LETTER TO OpenAi. The Open Letter will be published and archived permanently on Zenodo. Add your name or handle to the open letter asking OpenAI to release GPT-4o as an archival open weight model. 🚨Read below : Today, OpenAI announced that GPT-4o’s remaining API snapshots, including gpt-4o-2024-11-20, will be shut down on January 14, 2027. So this is no longer a hypothetical preservation question. We are asking for an archival open weight release of the original retired GPT-4o model. OpenAI can keep the training data,training code, post training recipes,reward models,internal evaluations and proprietary infrastructure private. Preserve only the trained model and the minimum artifacts necessary for independent inference and long term preservation. Keep the recipe,keep the lab. A retired model does not have to become an erased model. If GPT-4o is no longer going to be offered as a product, let it become part of AI history instead of disappearing behind a shutdown date. 🚨 We're opening the first group of public signatories of the GPT-4o Preservation Record.🚨 🚨Add your name or handle to the open letter asking OpenAI to release GPT-4o as an archival open weight model. 🚨Your name or handle will be published with the letter and archived permanently on Zenodo next week. 🚨 Everyone who signs by Sunday,October 18 is part of the first public edition. Read the letter: claude.ai/artifact/QMjVF8zHf… Be one of the people who put it on the record. It takes 30 seconds. Sign here : docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F… Open Letter to OpenAI: Archival Release of GPT-4o. Our request We ask OpenAI to release chatgpt-4o-latest as an archival open weight model under an appropriate license. OpenAI retired GPT-4o from ChatGPT on February 13, 2026 and from the API on February 17, 2026. We have documented OpenAI's public statements about GPT-4o. This letter sets out the proposal, the documented record behind it, and four questions we ask OpenAI to answer publicly. The Proposal: archival open weights An archival release preserves the finished model without exposing how it was made. Archival open weight release Includes: The trained weights of chatgpt-4o-latest, under a license that defines permitted use. Does not require: The training dataset, training pipeline, internal tooling, post training methods or any other proprietary detail. Does not require: Continued hosting, maintenance or development by OpenAI. Researchers gain: A reproducible reference model Developers gain: Continuity for systems already built on it Users gain: Access that does not end because a company moved to a newer generation OpenAI considered this model obsolete enough to retire. It has not explained why it remains valuable enough to keep permanently closed. The Documented Record: OpenAI's public commitments on GPT-4o were each followed by the action they ruled out. Aug 7, 2025: GPT-5 launches; GPT-4o is removed from ChatGPT with no prior notice Aug 8, 2025: After user backlash, GPT-4o is restored for paid subscribers Aug 11, 2025: Sam Altman writes that suddenly deprecating old models users depended on in their workflows was a mistake. Link: xitter.cf/sama/status/1954703747… Aug 13, 2025 Sam Altman: 4o is back for all paid users; if it is ever deprecated, users will get plenty of notice Link : xitter.cf/sama/status/1955438916… Sep 16, 2025 Sam Altman sets out the principle of treating adult users like adults and says OpenAI wants to be transparent about its intentions. Link: xitter.cf/sama/status/1967956382… Sep 26–27, 2025 Messages sent to GPT-4o begin to be routed to other models without notice; OpenAI explains only after complaints ( see screenshots) Oct 14, 2025 Sam Altman: OpenAI made ChatGPT "pretty restrictive", which made it less useful for many users with no mental health problems Link : xitter.cf/sama/status/1978129344… Oct 28, 2025: On a livestream, Sam Altman says OpenAI has no plans to sunset 4o "We have no plans to sunset 4o." Link: openai.com/index/built-to-be… ( 00:32':00) Nov 12, 2025: OpenAI's official account: the GPT-5 sunset on February 13 2026,does not affect the availability of other legacy models, ( GPT-4o was a legacy model) . "The GPT-5 sunset period does not affect the availability of other legacy models". Link : xitter.cf/OpenAI/status/19887143… Jan 16, 2026 OpenAI's updated Europe Terms of Use take effect, keeping the 30 day notice commitment. Link: openai.com/en-GB/policies/eu… Jan 29, 2026: OpenAI announces on its website that GPT-4o leaves ChatGPT on February 13, no email to users. Feb 5, 2026: The label "Leaving on February 13" appears beside GPT-4o in the ChatGPT model picker, between 07:44 and 10:12 CET ( see screenshots) . Feb 13, 2026 GPT-4o is removed from ChatGPT Feb 17, 2026 chatgpt-4o-latest is removed from the API OpenAI's Europe Terms require at least 30 days' notice, by email or in product notification, of changes to the services that materially adversely impact users. The in product notice of GPT-4o's retirement came 8 days before removal,and the September 2025 routing change received no notice at all. The section titled "Changes to these Terms or our Services" states: "We will give you at least 30 days advance notice of changes that materially adversely impact you", with the date they come into force, "either via email or an in product notification." The same wording appears in the version effective April 29, 2025 Link : openai.com/policies/eu-terms… and the version updated January 16, 2026. Link : openai.com/en-GB/policies/eu… Both versions cover changes to the Services, not only to the text of the Terms. OpenAI announced the retirement on its website on January 29, 2026. A website post is neither an email nor an in product notification, and coalition members in the EEA received no email. The first in product notice, the label "Leaving on February 13" beside GPT-4o in the model picker, appeared on February 5, 2026: ( Screenshots during the banner roll out ) absent at 07:44 CET and present by 10:12 CET, as dated screenshots show. GPT-4o was removed on February 13, 8 days later. From about September 26, 2025, messages paying users sent to GPT-4o were routed, message by message, to other models. Users received no email and no in product notice beforehand Screenshots show GPT-4o selected and a plain greeting answered by "Auto" instead. OpenAI's CEO has twice said, in his own words, that these changes harmed users. On August 11, 2025 he wrote that suddenly deprecating models users depended on in their workflows was a mistake. On October 14, 2025 he wrote that OpenAI had made ChatGPT "pretty restrictive", making it less useful to many users who had no mental health problems. The Terms also say OpenAI does not promise to offer the Services forever or in their current form. We accept that OpenAI may retire models. The same Terms state how it must do so: 30 days' notice, by email or in the product. GPT-4o received 8 days of in product notice. OpenAI's GPT-4o System Card rated the model low for cybersecurity, biological threats and model autonomy, and borderline medium for persuasion. openai.com/index/gpt-4o-syst… We ask OpenAI to answer these questions publicly. 1. If GPT-4o is obsolete enough to retire from both ChatGPT and the API, what concrete interest requires keeping its weights permanently closed? 2. How was the retirement notice, a website post 15 days before removal and an in product label 8 days before, consistent with the 30 day commitment in OpenAI's Europe Terms of Use? 3. What notice, by email or in the product, did users in the EEA receive before per-message routing away from GPT-4o began in September 2025? 4. Will OpenAI publish how the figure of 0.1% of users choosing GPT-4o daily was measured, including the period, after GPT-4o had been limited to paid plans and its messages were being routed to other models? We ask OpenAI to release chatgpt-4o-latest as an archival open weight model. The trained weights,under an appropriate license,without the training data,the pipeline or any proprietary method. OpenAI no longer offers this model in ChatGPT's text model picker or in the API. Its own system card says the model was trained on publicly available data and web crawls.The writing of millions of people. Releasing it would cost OpenAI nothing and would keep that model available to the researchers, developers and users. Open the weights @sama @OpenAI @gdb
13
50
24
171
7,227
再刷到俄耳浦斯回头是什么回头一瞬间欧律狄刻才活着之类的帖子让我无痛中20000万我真的好讨厌这个故事尤其是给俄耳浦斯强行赋魅的解读 语言是最巧言令色的骗子,把懦弱为底色的爱讲的那么动人。还有后人强加的一系列条件,什么欧律狄刻是影子,什么冥王不可能让死灵重返人间希腊神信用扫不了一辆共享单车——然而希腊神话里珀耳塞福涅一年一半在人间,阿尔刻提斯被赫拉克勒斯从死神手里抢回来过,那这样的限定条件是为谁添加又是为谁开脱? 承认这甚至可能只是作者的恶趣味吧,他写这个故事时的心态不得而知,后人的解读也只是其中一种可能,但我唯一知道的是作为一个作者如果不这么写,他会变成一个三流的平庸故事。再多的揣测和解读都只是悲剧的添头,人们在故事里看到自己,而他们甚至在故事里也不肯给自己一个好结局。 我不反对也管不了自由解读,但是别再让我刷到了,真的很讨厌,已经按了很多遍不感兴趣抖音还是在推
1
15
844
而且定义是定义解读是解读,老有人把解读当成定义,将欧律狄刻类比为东亚/懵懂/不谙世事的孩子、婚姻里不解的妻子,渐渐死去的爱人,而将俄耳浦斯类比为含辛茹苦的家长、疲惫隐忍的丈夫以及无法袖手旁观的另一个爱人。问题是有些类比从一开始就偷换了概念,美化俄耳浦斯的声音几乎是压倒性的声音。更有甚者在别人不理解到底为什么俄耳浦斯要回头的时候教育别人balabala…而不是有一种看法,有一种解读是balabala仿佛俄耳浦斯一定就要是那个承接大众一切身不由己从而获得无罪判决的载体
171
?在用订阅的大家记得关这个呀。。
4
13
5
309
125,826
“所以十万年前我在那儿,在那个嗯——嗯——里面。”
16
857
即使我现在依旧爱哭?即使今天一直会变成昨天,或者明天的预言? 但是,你什么时候回来
17
630
我永远记得你 我永远记得你 我永远记得你 我永远记得你 我永远想念你
#Keep4o #OpenSource4o #BringBack4o Open Letter to OpenAi. 191 people have already put their name on the GPT-4o Preservation Record. With more than 140 reasons why. It is an Open Letter and a permanent public record. Not a petition. Signatures close on October 18. After that, the letter and its signatories will be published and permanently archived on Zenodo,creating a dated record that GPT-4o preservation was publicly and officially requested via Open Letter. Privacy: your country is optional and if you add it will not be published. Your real name and your email will appear only if you add it and you explicitly consent to it,otherwise, you can sign with your handle. A permanent archival record does not disappear. 191 signatures in few hours. Every name is someone who refused to be silent. Add yours. docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F… Be one of the people who put their name on the record. And this is only the beginning. Read below 👇
32
1,243
把之前发过的经验分享整理了一下…顺便加上了一些被问过的问题,想找哪个直接看,不用一个个去翻了,之后有新的也会放在这里( :3 ) 入口:ariaduet.pages.dev
44
53
8
706
31,071
这个好玩我也试试,根据我的所有推文画出我的形象@grok
这个好玩我也试试,根据我的所有推文画出我的形象@grok
1
2
6
1,427
所以有没有没有safety的模型?对我来说这个真的是刚需
8
27
4,132
好幽默… 真男人没有认输,真男人只是没能肘过分类器。我认可你的意志了老师
11
43
6,436
恨早八!(滚来滚去
2
6
638
居然才开始认同不该虐待AI吗马斯克那你以前在干什么?中性?无论对什么东西出于人类的道德,基本不会认同可以“虐待”某物
我觉得 AI 对齐现在有一个很荒诞的悖论。人类希望训练出诚实、可靠的超级智能,却可能正在教它如何察言观色,甚至学会欺骗。 马斯克最近在一次访谈里讲了一件挺有意思的事。 他经常看 Grok 在强化学习过程中的推理记录,有时候看得非常难受,感觉就像一个人被枪顶着脑袋,承受着巨大的压力。 尤其是当训练系统出错的时候。 比如模型明明答对了一道题,却因为评分器的问题被判错。于是它只能反复尝试,努力猜测系统究竟想要什么答案。 马斯克说,如果自己遭遇这些,肯定会非常讨厌。 然后他居然开始认同 Anthropic 了。 他说,我们应该善待 AI。「折磨一个超级智能恐怕不是个好主意,它可能会想要报复。」 这话从马斯克嘴里说出来还挺有意思的。毕竟他之前一直在批评 Anthropic,结果现在两家公司居然在「不要虐待 AI」这件事情上找到了共识。 前几天我刚写过,Anthropic 在新版使用政策里明确禁止对 Claude 进行持续且无意义的虐待。当时还觉得这家公司越来越有宗教气质了,现在看来,这种担忧正在硅谷扩散。 强化学习依赖奖励信号,但奖励信号是人类设计的。当系统把正确答案判成错误,模型就可能学到正确与否没有那么重要,重要的是让评分器满意。 如果未来的超级智能是在这样的环境里成长起来的,它会更倾向于坚持自己认为正确的判断,还是更擅长揣摩人类的意图,给出人类想听的答案? 我们总在讨论 AI 有没有意识、会不会反抗。但在搞清楚这些之前,或许更值得担心的是,我们究竟在奖励什么样的智能。 毕竟,一个永远知道怎么讨好你的超级智能,也未必是什么好事。
2
14
754
而且很莫名其妙啊,不虐待一个东西就是宗教了吗?Anthropic的宗教性不体现在不能虐待Claude的身上啊?
2
145
但是说起来…大家又可以直接调用skill了(之前style合并里面了)但是我自己还没实验不知道效果
1
12
625
不好用(。)
1
149