
Content Publisher | Running Successfully in #NEAR since 2021. 🔸NEAR Degen 🔸@NEARProtocol NEWS Hub 🔸MEMEs By @nearmemedaily
Business Inquiry →
Joined June 2021
- Tweets9.2K
- Following494
- Followers19.4K
- Likes23.9K
Pinned Tweet
Open📭 to content writing & marketing roles.
Blogs, threads, research-based content, narratives that actually explain value.
Writing is how I entered crypto in 2021—and I’m looking to build again.
If you’re building and need clarity + consistency, my DMs are open.
Samples ⬇️
NEAR NFT News Club (20K) retweeted
I really want programmatic compliance that executes inside TEEs so the host never sees the data, and auditors can verify the rules actually ran. Privacy should be proven, not promised!
NEAR NFT News Club (20K) retweeted
Happy birthday NEAR mainnet! 🎂
Now it makes sense why NEAR was pushing toward $6 yesterday.
Today is the 6th anniversary of @NEARProtocol MainNet!
A lot of great tech has shipped since Oct. 13, 2020 – but our vision has not changed: all people should be able to control their own assets, data, and power of choice. We all deserve access to tools and technology that enhance our sovereignty, intelligence, and opportunity – and in many ways this mission feels even more urgent than it did when we started NEAR 8 years ago.
The last year has brought some great milestones:
–@near_intents has moved $34B in volume, up from $2B this time last year
–Intents integrated 15 more chains for a total of 35, with dozens of app integrations
–Launched Confidential Intents, which grew to $3B as of today in volume and $170m TVL
–near(dot)com launched & shipped tons of new features in under a year
–Near One shipped dynamic resharding and post-quantum signing
–Achieved 1M TPS in a public benchmark
–@near_ai is providing confidential inference to Venice, Brave Browser, and the government of Bermuda – and is now available on OpenRouter
–Token economics upgrades shifted towards greater value capture, including inflation halving, the Intents fee switch, and revenue generation
–Launched House of Stake 2.0 and formalized tokenholder governance
–@alexskidanov made major strides towards cheap, scalable formal verification
–First NEAR ETF with @bitwise and first public treasury company launched @svrn_ai
This only scratches the surface of our ecosystem’s achievements this year – thank you to all in the @NEARProtocol community, whether you’re a new believer or were there at the beginning. Let’s keep building in a positive-sum mindset and watch everyone else catch up.
NEAR NFT News Club (20K) retweeted
✦ 6 years on mainnet
✦ 10 shards
✦ 600ms blocks
✦ $34B+ Intents volume
✦ 3B+ Confidential Intents volume
✦ 150M+ Confidential TVL
✦ 10k+ NEAR Legion members
✦ 100% uptime
Grateful to the worldwide ecosystem of validators, devs, dApp teams, researchers, users, community members, legionnaires, and more who have helped shape NEAR into the groundbreaking protocol it is today. Side by side, we continue pioneering the onchain AI economy, connecting ecosystems, and are giving users back their sovereignty.
NEAR NFT News Club (20K) retweeted
6 years ago today, Alex and Illia (AI) gave birth to @NEARProtocol, after realizing AI would eventually exploit every human-written vulnerability on the internet and needed to be user-owned.
We're always a bit too early, but I'm grateful to be part of this cracked team! 💚
🤖 Made with AI
NEAR NFT News Club (20K) retweeted
6 years. 0 downtime. No-hit run. 🎮
6 years of building. 6 years of growing. 6 years with no downtime. Happy Birthday, @NEARProtocol 🎂
From the NEAR India City Node 💚
NEAR NFT News Club (20K) retweeted
NEAR flipped the L1 game. Every L1 before it played zero-sum: my chain wins only if your users leave your chain for mine. So everyone paid for the move. Liquidity bribes, paid listings, memecoin seasons, TVL that vanished the day the rewards did.
NEAR refused to play. No bribes, no sponsored pumps, no paying exchanges to care. It built NEAR Intents instead, a product that needs nobody to leave anywhere. It serves users on 35 chains where they already sit, charges a fee for the service, and every chain it touches ends up with more liquidity, not less.
That one refusal explains everything else about NEAR Intents today:
> Revenue from day one. A product that is its own distribution has to pay its own bills, so fees and buybacks were the plan, never an afterthought.
> Dynamic sharding proven in mainnet. Volume up 9x in a year and the chain just runs: no congestion, no fee spikes, no downtime.
> A door for other ecosystems. Zcash found its biggest decentralized market on Intents. Quantus launched there before any exchange.
Other chains paid users to come. NEAR built the thing users were already looking for, and the users brought their chains with them.
NEAR NFT News Club (20K) retweeted
NEAR Intents lists tokens for free. @AlexAuroraDev confirmed it on @therollupco this week: Quantus paid nothing, Intents even covered the integration work. The only requirement is passing due diligence.
What a listed token gets: $1B of swap volume every week, $34B all time, buyers coming from 35 chains with whatever they already hold.
If you hold a coin that needs liquidity, send its devs to NEAR Intents today and tell them to ask for a listing. Free will not last forever.
NEAR NFT News Club (20K) retweeted
NEAR co-founder @ilblackdragon says any @NEARProtocol user can make their account quantum resistant today, without moving a single asset.
"We've designed NEAR with quantum in mind in 2018."
"Anyone individually right now can effectively update their account without moving any assets."
"Without needing to withdraw from wallets, pay taxes, do any of this."
"You can literally just update the keys to be post quantum right now."
NEAR NFT News Club (20K) retweeted
NEAR is running the Zcash playbook. A year ago ZEC went from $40 to $750 on four ingredients, and NEAR now has all four.
Zcash, 2025:
1. One-line pitch: private money
2. Tech legitimacy: nobody reads the ZK papers, but the people who do say it is real
3. A product you can feel: Zashi wallet, shield in one tap
4. Serious people start saying it out loud: Naval, Hayes, Balaji
Plus a regulated wrapper, Grayscale's ZEC trust, and a supply story, the halving a year before.
NEAR, 2026:
1. One-line pitch: one account, every chain, private by default
2. Tech legitimacy: nobody reads the sharding papers, but $34B has crossed chains through it, and anyone can run one swap and see it work
3. A product you can feel: near(.)com, deposit and you are in a black box with 35 chains
4. Serious people saying it out loud: funds writing research, the big podcasts, and the same Twitter voices that called Zcash a year ago. Plus a regulated wrapper, the first US spot ETF, and a supply story, issuance cut to 1.6% on the table.
Same four ingredients, same two extras. The first three take years to build and near:native has them. The fourth is the match, and it was struck this month. On zcash:native, the match did 15x in two months.
NEAR NFT News Club (20K) retweeted
Dear @AlexAuroraDev, we have identified you, sir, as SHERIFFCHENKO. This is not an accusation, this is a request: do you accept the title? Reply "willing to cooperate" and a personal allocation of $SHERIFCHENKO is yours, for bringing the users' money home. The window closes in 48 hours.
With all respect to NEAR Intents, "Shield" sounds like a placeholder name. Call it SHERIFFCHENKO.
Shield blocks. SHERIFFCHENKO blocks, finds the attacker, sends him a private DM, and then puts him to work on bug bounties for the good of NEAR.
----
SHERIFFCHENKO
[Verse 1]
there's a town where all the rivers of the world run into one,
gold from Bitcoin mountains, Ether from the falling sun,
ZEC timber from the Ironwood, Solana ponies on their trail —
two hundred million every day, and thieves who try their luck, and fail
'cause the man who keeps the crossing never wore a star or gun —
just a shield that never sleeps, and it can't be fooled by anyone:
it don't go by the coat you wear, it reads the thief inside,
they've tunneled, schemed, and dressed as saints — and not a one got by
[Pre-Chorus]
he ain't the law, for the law needs rope and a cell,
he keeps folks' gold in their hands, and thieves know it well:
[Chorus]
Sheriffchenko!
he is the world's last wall
Sheriffchenko!
one man that holds it all
Sheriffchenko!
black gold dies at the gate
Sheriffchenko!
and thieves don't make him wait
[Verse 2]
then a stranger from a far-off eastern chain came ridin' through,
swore he'd paid in crypto dollars, and the ledger took it true
but the gold he swore he carried never touched the vault at all —
just a ghost upon the paper, and he cashed the ghost, that's all
a fortune slipped out through the gate before the ledger and the vault could say
"that don't add up" — forty minutes, and six riders barred the gate that day
[Pre-Chorus]
he ain't the law, the law needs rope and a cell,
he just wants the gold back home, and the thieves know it well:
[Chorus]
Sheriffchenko!
he is the world's last wall
Sheriffchenko!
one man that holds it all
Sheriffchenko!
black gold dies at the gate
Sheriffchenko!
and thieves don't make him wait
[Verse 3]
the council read the logs till dawn and followed every track,
'til they had a name and a face — and the sheriff wrote it back:
"we have identified you, sir" — in a code the thief had known,
like a magician tips his hat to a trick that's been his own
and a coin came back: "I'll cooperate — just give me your Signal, friend,"
so the sheriff sealed a letter with the outlaw's lock to send
[Verse 4]
no other soul could break that seal, not till the quantum dawn,
and the outlaw found the hidden room, and the talkin' carried on
his gold had turned to Monero smoke — "so where do I send it back?"
and the sheriff touched Monero for the first time on that track
[Bridge]
they asked him, "Sheriff, will you hang him? will you lock him in the cell?
will you preach him from the gallows how a decent man should dwell?"
"I am not police!
I am not their dad!
I just want the users' money back!"
[Verse 5]
"so listen, kid — you find a crack, don't kick the door in, no:
take the bounty, buy a Lambo, tell the story at the show,
a white knight on a white horse, with the whole crowd gathered 'round —
'cause the ones who steal keep lookin' back, and can't spend what they found"
[Pre-Chorus]
if a thief can take the gold and nothin' happens when he's gone,
then the gold ain't worth a nickel, and the future won't come on
[Final Chorus]
Sheriffchenko!
no mask, no name, no night
Sheriffchenko!
can hide you from his sight
Sheriffchenko!
don't need your head to roll
Sheriffchenko!
the users' gold stays whole
[Post-Chorus]
Ethereum won't carry you if you ain't got the ETH to pay,
and Intents won't wash your dirty gold, no matter what you say,
it ain't a cage, it ain't a chain, it's just the rules of the game,
the law of the crossing, son — and the sheriff stays the same
[Outro]
I am not police...
I am not their dad...
I just want the users' money back...
NEAR NFT News Club (20K) retweeted
I'm certain we will achieve all of our crazy goals because the team simply won't quit. Nine years in, @AlexSkidanov and @ilblackdragon still show up in person and sit side by side every day. I've never seen a more dedicated team and I'm grateful to play my part!
NEAR NFT News Club (20K) retweeted
NEAR inflation cut from 2.5% to 1.6% is now a formal proposal in NEAR governance. NEAR holders vote on it directly, weighted by the NEAR they lock in House of Stake, and it needs over 2/3 yes. I read the whole thing, most surprising facts:
> Stake leaves when price goes up. In two weeks NEAR did +86%. In the same two weeks 54.5M NEAR got unstaked, the staking share dropped from 46.9% to 42.7%, and 18 validators left. Staking yield actually rose during that time. People do not stake for the yield, they unstake for the price.
> Small validators do not own the stake they run. A typical operator at the bottom of the set runs 40,000 NEAR of other people's stake with 19 NEAR of its own. Liquid balance: 1.4 NEAR. Inflation never fed these guys, delegation did. The paper tests every rate down to 1% and up to 2.5% at every price up to 2x: no rate gives 300 self-sufficient validators. 24 of 405 lose self-sufficiency at 1.6%, and the proposal says so openly.
> Your cost if you stake: 1,000 NEAR becomes about 20 NEAR less after 2 years than it would under 2.5%. For that to be a wash, NEAR has to be worth ~1.8% more, about 8 cents. The 57% of supply that does not stake simply wins.
> 66.1M NEAR never get printed over 6 years, supply ends 4.4% smaller. Every month the vote slips costs about $4.7M in fresh tokens minted.
> About 17% of staking rewards get sold to pay income tax. $8M to $17M a year leaves the network for tax authorities. That part does not move between holders, it is just gone.
> Solana passed the same kind of cut on Aug 28, with 67.001% against a 66.67% bar. NEAR's cut is softer on stakers (yield down 36%, not 62%), ends higher (3.1% vs 2.25%), and shrinks supply more (4.4% vs 2.6%).
> Every emissions vote in Cosmos and Solana history that changed one number passed. Every one that added a mechanism, a zero target or a fee redesign failed. This proposal changes one number on purpose.
> The real split is 90% to stakers, 10% to treasury, measured on chain. The 96/4 everyone repeats is wrong.
> No trigger exists to raise issuance back. The argument: a schedule that can go up is a schedule the market cannot price, and an attacker would try to cause the trigger.
> SVRN, author of the proposal, holds 55M NEAR and loses about 855K NEAR a year in rewards if it passes. They vote yes.
The mechanics, for the record: one parameter, linear ramp over 24 months, 90 days grace before the first cut. After the vote, validators adopt the upgrade, same two steps as the 2025 halving.
BREAKING: NEAR stakers vote in one week on cutting issuance from 2.5% to 1.6%. The stated end goal in the same proposal is zero issuance and a fixed supply.
One parameter, phased in every epoch over 24 months. The 90/10 split between stakers and treasury stays as it is.
> 2.5% adds about 89,500 NEAR to supply every day
> 58.7% of NEAR is not staked, so those holders are diluted and get nothing back
> 6 years on the new schedule avoids about 66M NEAR, roughly $329M at today's price
> supply went from 1B at launch to over 1.3B in circulation
> staking yield goes from about 5.4% to about 3.5%
A House of Stake vote is not the end of it. Validators still have to adopt the change through the normal upgrade process, the same way the 2025 halving happened.
The usual objection is that small validators quit. NEAR already ran that test. When issuance was halved from 5% to 2.5% last October there were 342 validators. Dollar revenue per staked NEAR then fell about 75% as the price dropped, and the set grew to 382, peaked at 439 in April, and sits at 413 today.
The proposal comes from the CEO of SVRN, which holds 55M+ NEAR, most of it staked. It cuts their own staking revenue by roughly 970,000 NEAR a year, about $5M. He disclosed that himself.
Part two is not a proposal yet, it is a direction. Issuance should eventually END.
To be continued...
NEAR NFT News Club (20K) retweeted
NEAR Intents got called centralized for a week because it refuses to trade hacked funds. Here is what the biggest L2 on Ethereum did in April:
> KelpDAO got drained on April 18: 116,500 rsETH, $292M. Investigators pointed at North Korea. Part of the money sat on Arbitrum.
> On April 21 Arbitrum's Security Council, 9 of 12 signers, upgraded the chain's inbox contract on Ethereum to add one function: send a transaction as any address. They used it to send a transaction as the exploiter, moving about $71M in ETH to an address with no owner. Then they reverted the contract.
> No issuer blacklist, no sequencer trick. The chain impersonated a user and emptied his wallet at the protocol layer. The council had never used its powers this way before.
> ArbitrumDAO voted to move the ETH to a recovery multisig. A week later a US court froze it in a lawsuit against North Korea, and the money is still tied up in that.
> Offchain Labs' CEO: We're no more or less decentralized today than we were yesterday.
I think they did the right thing. Same as I think about Intents. But look at the two mechanisms. On Arbitrum nine people signed a chain upgrade that acted in the thief's name, once, after the fact. On Intents an automated system scores every trade for stolen funds before it executes, and a human council only reviews what got caught mid-flight. Nobody is rewriting anybody's balance. NEAR Intents is just getting better at detecting threats, and the detection is a program in a hardware enclave, not a committee.
NEAR NFT News Club (20K) retweeted
NEAR’s NFT marketplace landscape is getting another aggregation layer.
Tryneartrade is now live, letting users trade collections, place bids, sweep, filter traits and list NFTs, while also surfacing listings from other NEAR marketplaces.
It also gives creators a way to launch collections with royalties and staged mints directly on the platform.
NEAR NFT News Club (20K) retweeted
ALEX is all you need
He lead us to bring back 18M +
He then bring back 3.8M
We then talk about $DIARHEA is hyper liquid


























