Pay for services within rules you approve first, so you get the convenience of automatic payments with clearer limits and more control.

Joined March 2025
MuPay retweeted
We've been cooking up something exciting...see the new & improved nano.org 👀 A brand new, sleeker look that nano deserves! $XNO
15
65
7
233
8,122
MuPay retweeted
A little recap of the last 11 years of #nano $XNO 🙌 From captcha faucet, to the upcoming V29 Piotric release - lots has happened in the past 11 years, without a single network fee paid! 🎉 Happy birthday nano! 🥳
16
84
2
256
7,746
MuPay retweeted
We’re sad to see this delisting too but don’t worry you can still exchange Nano and accept payments in Nano on Nanswap. We’ll never delist it from our side. 🙏
We are incredibly disappointed to learn Nano is being delisted from @ChangeNOW and @NOWPayments_io Despite our repeated requests for clarity and offers to help resolve their concerns, the decision was made and acted on without warning or a timeframe to inform our community. Full statement in thread below. If you run a business that accepts nano:native through Nowpayments, please see below below for alternatives that might suit your needs.
3
15
1
78
1,955
Hey $XNO people, remember to tune in today for the MuPay livestream: an early look at a more flexible, privacy-conscious way to pay online. 🕗 20:00 Europe / 2:00 PM USA (East coast) Set a reminder / join: xitter.cf/i/broadcasts/1wxWjjNkb…
16
44
1,069
A better way to pay online is taking shape. Join the MuPay livestream for an early look at what we’re building. For: - $XNO, $BTC, and other crypto enthusiasts - Merchants exploring crypto payments - Builders shaping the next generation of payment rails Tuesday, 11 August · 20:00 CEST / 2:00 PM EDT Be there for the first look. Set a reminder xitter.cf/i/broadcasts/1wxWjjNkb…
🤖 Made with AI
1
5
24
566
MuPay wallet demo coming soon 🚀 I’ll be showing the nano:native based MuPay protocol core functionality. What would you like to see explained or covered? Got any questions? Drop a reply or DM me. If you're new here check out mupay.io to learn more. Stay tuned 👀
8
55
896
x402 points in the right direction: pay-per-use is coming. But crypto keeps making users deal with the technicals: chains, fees, signatures, confirmations, waiting. People don’t want payment infrastructure. They want access. @MuPayOnline makes the payment layer disappear.
18
774
There’s no doubt nano:native is one of the best cryptos for micropayments. Fast. Feeless. Highly fungible. Tiny footprint. There’s a problem though... Have you ever made a Nano payment that didn’t involve pulling out your phone, scanning a QR code, entering the amount, and hitting send? Now imagine doing that several times with tiny amounts just to access the content you want. Yeah. Clunky as hell. This is just one of the small things @MuPayOnline is solving. A new way to pay online is coming. Stay tuned 👀
2
14
1
66
1,645
Legendary investor @RayDalio lays out four major problems with bitcoin:native vs gold: 1. No real privacy, making it indirectly controllable by larger entities 2. High correlation with tech stocks, weakening the “safe haven” thesis 3. Dependence on miners, turning infrastructure into a liability 4. Long-term protocol risk, including threats like quantum computing For central banks and institutions, these are not small issues. They are potential showstoppers. So if bitcoin:native struggles as a medium of exchange and is questionable as a store of wealth, what is left? This points to a bigger issue in crypto: if a protocol does not enable something meaningfully new, something that cannot be done better with existing technology, why should it exist? That is why I’m building MuPay on nano:native. Nano does not magically solve every problem Bitcoin has. But it radically reduces many of the downsides and gives builders a foundation for products that are difficult, or impossible, to create any other way. That is the kind of crypto I think is worth building on. youtube.com/shorts/RMsGI2OE5…
8
436
People want to access content, but... They hate being forced into subscriptions for one article. They hate locking money in just so they can make small payments. They hate crypto checkouts that still ask them to scan QR codes like it’s 2008. @MuPayOnline + $XNO fixes this: instant, feeless, non-custodial, pay-as-you-go access to content. ⚡ Soon you’ll see what internet money was supposed to be. Stay tuned 👀
4
34
535
People ask why did MuPay choose $XNO? 👀 Because MuPay is built on a simple idea: online payments should be usage-based, privacy-conscious, and controlled by the user. Most payment rails break that model. MuPay lets users define who can charge them, what they can charge for, how much, and for how long. That only works if the payment rail can handle small, frequent internet payments without adding fees, delays, or checkout friction. That’s why MuPay uses $XNO ⚡️ The result? Better UX for users, faster settlement for merchants, and business models that traditional card rails make too expensive or awkward to support.
3
24
1
119
4,035
Subscriptions make people overpay. Checkout adds friction. Prepaid credits lock money in. MuPay is exploring a better model for digital services: • 🔐 non-custodial • ✅ approve a merchant once with clear limits • 🔁 recurring / ongoing payments only within those rules • 💸 funds go directly from user to merchant • 🕵️ better privacy For users: more control, less subscription bloat, more privacy. For merchants: less checkout friction, more flexible pricing, direct settlement. Learn more at mupay.io
🤖 Made with AI
1
6
341
NanoStandard is now MuPay 🚀 We just put up the MuPay landing page: 👉 mupay.io The idea is simple, approve a service once, set the rules, then let payments happen inside those boundaries. MuPay is for usage-based payments that stay understandable, bounded, under control, and private 🔒 For merchants, it means less friction, lower fees, and no long waits to get paid. If that sounds like the internet should’ve worked already, you’re not alone. Stay tuned 👀
10
33
639
Hi folks, creator of NanoStandard here. Some of you may have noticed that NanoStandard has been inactive for a while. For the time being the project is being shelved. NanoStandard began with a question I was curious about: How much is Nano actually being used around the world? I was able to answer that partly, but doing it properly required building and maintaining a data pipeline for ingesting and processing Nano network data which turned out to be much harder and more time-consuming than I expected. Moreover, I felt that while interesting, this kind of project does not by itself do much to move Nano forward. So NanoStandard is paused indefinitely. That said, I still believe in Nano, and I still want to contribute to the ecosystem. AI tools have made it possible for me to take on more ambitious projects solo, and I’ll be sharing that new project soon. It starts with one question: If Nano is different, why do its wallets look like every other crypto wallet? More coming soon. Stay tuned.
3
42
616
🔥 Ever wondered how much $XNO is actually burned, meaning irrecoverable or lost forever? The only provably burned $XNO is what sits in the canonical burn address (~207M NANO). Everything else is speculation. Let's try anyway. 👇
2
5
49
1,716
This almost certainly overstates the actual burned amount, since long-term $XNO holders often store their assets in untouched cold wallets they still control. On the other hand, how many people would leave their $XNO untouched for 5+ years, through all the market swings? 📉📈
1
4
394
🧮 Conclusion: Roughly ~1.65M NANO sits in ~6.24M inactive, single-use accounts. 🤔 Thoughts? Is this a reasonable way to approximate burned $XNO? Stay tuned for more! 🔥
1
2
9
494