MsK MP

She's back to do some damage control! Too late... Adv van den Heever &her disruptive approach mara🤷 Cat Matlala at the #MadlangaCommission

He's stretched the justice system so much that his initial conviction is Now taking secondary place while he questions the very system!

He said "Not on My Watch".... Lt-Gen Mkhwanazi the patriot took the risk to alert SA accordingly! The country was gone #MadlangaCommision #MadlangaCommission

Adv Sesi Baloyi was very professional when she said "Jy's lastig"! This magogo's agenda is bigger than meets the eye🤞💯 #MadlangaCommission

Adv Sesi Baloyi was very professional when she said "Jy's lastig"! This magogo's agenda is bigger than meets the eye🤞💯 #MadlangaCommission

What would Dr Pali Lehohla say.... He relates better to "academia" (SA problems in numbers/stats) xitter.cf/i/status/1895898964899…

Adv Sesi Baloyi was very professional when she said "Jy's lastig"! This magogo's agenda is bigger than meets the eye🤞💯 #MadlangaCommission

Adv Sesi Baloyi was very professional when she said "Jy's lastig"! This magogo's agenda is bigger than meets the eye🤞💯 #MadlangaCommission

ACTIONSA's DEMAND THAT ZILLE AND BRINK BE REMOVED An abrasive and unnecessary demand, one which I would not have acceded to, but... Two points to bear in mind before we close doors all over the show. 1. It could simply be an unskilled opening gambit. Test it. 2. The idea itself - of removing parties from negotiating teams or other structures - is rather well-established in conflict negotiation. Not all that unusual at all. It can be handled as a concession for progress, without conceding the merits of the complaint. Stephen John Stedman called these "spoilers" nearly 30 years ago, and much work has gone into the concept. This exclusion can create its own secondary conflict, as can be imagined, and should only be considered in cases of true impasse. It comes at a very high cost, even if used as bargaining chip. There are quite a few global examples - last year's Austrian coalition, Belgium's informal agreement to exclude Vlaams Belang, comparable case studies against AfD in Germany, others in Sweden and France. In a less specific sense, most of these parties already do this when they refuse to negotiate or lead with certain parties. This takes the same principle and focuses on two individuals. I doubt that the DA in-group would allow such a manifest insult, and it would send a terrible message, potentially. As I say, I would not accept the condition. It's too costly a trade, it concedes too much, to a junior partner, and it comes at a bad time. The only possible reason I can advance as devil's advocate would be that the people's interest should outweigh that if individuals. But, there are other ways of getting this done

This little girl's reaction is priceless 😍😍

9 to 5 exit strategy…

Drunk power Nje! Hope he spent the night behind bars; just for control! Drama ka nnete🤞💯

I'm in a quandary. I can't vote ANC and still respect myself as rational. I can't vote DA and still regard myself as sane. I can't vote for any party and still regard myself as discerning. I can't abstain & still regard myself as engaged. It's a mess.🙆🏿‍♀️

Phalaphala saga will forever be fascinating... So many missteps 🧐🤷