usertyt

who's tested it already? Claude Opus 4.7 in the announcement focus is on working reliability: > model should handle long tasks more confidently > follow instructions more accurately > and double-check its result before responding more often based on the release card the upgrade over Opus 4.6 looks noticeable as we see Anthropic positions 4.7 as a model for long autonomous work where you need to keep task flow, check yourself along the way and need less manual oversight feels like the jump from 4.5 to 4.6 objectively better at keeping context, actually breaks instructions less often, especially the “don't do this” parts basically no revolution but pre-nerf Opus 4.6 was more than enough for everything i need now and if this is the same but with known bugs fixed i'm into it...

web3 marketers won’t be jobless cos there’s one of the most crucial tasks ai doesn’t solve yet - it’s the distribution question now entry barrier for creating your own product is lower than ever but the question how to get in front of your product’s potential user’s eyes ai doesn’t solve

Utility > Speculation you’ve already seen Dragonfly raised a 4th fund for $650M 2026 will be the shift from speculative projects to real ones focus of venture capital’s already on: > stablecoins > payment infrastructure > rwa hope you’ll find your spot in the next cycle

article about the intersection’s ready 1. ai 2. crypto what’s more interesting for you to study right now?

English is becoming the main language for research, design, coding, deployment and management…

future comes slowly but happens instantly

3B+ users suddenly plugged into crypto rails round two but now in a more regulated and favourable setting is this the quiet shift from bank money > platform money > protocol money?

Meta doesn’t wanna be a crypto company they wanna own the payment layer for 3 billion people and stablecoins are just the cheapest way to pull it off

over the first 2 months of 2026 ai talk is growing like crazy so much it’s overshadowed crypto sector even though the year just started you reckon ai will pull the liquidity blanket to itself?

the article text sounds appealing > freedom > minimalism > anti-corporate vibe but in practice this approach has loads of serious downsides that show up over time and often wreck your life way harder than the regular “salary cage” it's well written for motivating a specific audience [ young people tired of 9-5 ] but it's got many dangerous generalisations after such a strong hook let's talk about the dangerous generalisations: 1. “hard work” and education are framed as a scam the text creates the feeling that effort almost always leads to a mediocre life while formal education is a meaningless overrated asset. emotionally this sounds nice to those who've already burnt out or gotten disillusioned but this correlates badly with reality research on education returns shows on average each extra year of study boosts income by ~9-12% annually while higher education still gives noticeable earnings increase and chances for stable life. this doesn't mean “any degree equals success” but the claim “education doesn't pay off” is just wrong statistically same with work: the issue is direction you can burn out in a dumb job or you can use periods of “hard grind” as a leap for capital skills and moving into freer formats [ own project ] ignoring this side and contrasting “any labour” with “freedom” is classic black-and-white distortion 2. romanticising NEET and ignoring consequences in the text NEET status is presented as “natural path to happiness” and almost a freedom synonym. this looks cool against office fatigue backdrop but if you look at data most NEETs live nothing like on IG research shows young people who drop out of education and work for long periods on average more often face depression anxiety social isolation and health issues long unemployment isn't just “more free time” but a risk factor for years ahead: mental state gets worse self-esteem drops getting back to labour market gets harder chances of getting stuck in low-paid or unstable roles grow when money's eventually needed en masse “never work” is accumulation of financial and psychological fragility 3. survivorship bias and “normality” illusion author speaks from position of someone for whom “not working” worked out but this is very narrow privileged subsample. those whose NEET lifestyle experiment didn't end in poverty depression or harsh setback just don't make it into the text most NEETs live differently: off parents/partners with low autonomy future anxiety and “survival” side jobs many end up in this status not cos they “woke up and chose freedom” but due to lack of education skills health or normal labour market text masks real risks for most people who'll try repeating this scenario 4. internal contradiction text simultaneously: > attacks work and education > sells disciplined ascetic image [ sport reading order financial control dopamine detox ] paradox emerges... author acknowledges value of difficult long-term effort in all spheres except one they propose applying discipline to sport daily life and info hygiene but forbid transferring it where it gives max effect over lifetime result is reader may come away thinking “gotta be organised and developed but under no circumstances use this to get stronger in market and reduce dependence on circumstances” and this is already beautiful form of self-limitation 5. “salary cage” vs “absolute freedom” text builds picture like person has only two options: either you sit in office 9-5 and sell life for money or you go into radical NEET minimalism and achieve genuine freedom [ convenient for dramaturgy and virality ] between these poles lies huge spectrum: remote work part-time employment career change craft freelance contract work own project/small business seasonal earnings pauses between projects relocating to another market etc ----------------------------------------------- when person's sold only two extreme scenarios they may make sharp emotional leap “quit abandon everything” instead of gradually assembling more sustainable life configuration like testing new work formats acquiring skills building financial cushion reducing dependence on one employer. ultimately radical “never work” often doesn't expand choice but conversely narrows it: > longer you're outside education and labour market fewer real options you have such articles go brilliantly viral on social media precisely cos they show extremity radical system rejection algorithms love content that evokes strong emotions [ anger envy inspiration outrage or “wow actually true!” ] 2024-2025-2026 research confirms emotionally charged polarising extreme content gets many times more engagement cos it provokes reactions faster than nuanced balance people scroll for dopamine from “agreeing with rebellion” or “system outrage” algorithms amplify this [ more outrage more impressions longer you're in app ] result is millions of views but often at cost of distorted reality picture so let's engage brains and not swallow extremes on empty stomach ----------------------------------------------- pure NEET style is all-in gamble where loss is almost guaranteed over time if you still wanna try better do it with 5-10 year cushion and clear return plan next post i'll share what i think is healthier more sustainable approach that works for most people what are your thoughts on my counterarguments?

right now’s the best time in crypto to 1: take a vacation 2: make connections with industry tops cos the noise in their field of vision is gone

alright, we’ve sorted bd now i’m hunting for marketers who in ct genuinely shares insights about marketing? if you’re a marketer or know someone to tag write in the replies help compile the list