Tall fella; used to do a bit of dancing; #LFC fan

Joined February 2009
On 19 July 2024, I published two posts on my X account in which I made allegations about Mr Mothin Ali being involved in the Harehills riots. I have accepted these were incorrect and I have jointly made a statement in open Court in order to apologise to Mr Ali and correct the record which is below. archive.org/details/JSIOC-MA…
781
1,757
344
1,304
324,510
Mothin Ali – apology and Correction   On 18 July 2024, I published a post on my X account in which I stated that Mr Mothin Ali, an elected official and Deputy Leader of the Green Party, was involved in the Harehills riots of July 2024 in which people attacked the police.   That statement was incorrect. In fact, Mr Ali was asked by the police to use his position of trust in the community to help bring about peace on the streets. Mr Ali attended the scene for that purpose alone. He was not involved in the disorder or violence in any way, and on the contrary he was one of the principal reasons of bringing an end to the disorder. I offer my sincere apologies to Mr Ali for my post, the harm I caused, and I have agreed to pay him compensation to vindicate his reputation.
511
951
164
1,199
148,804
I see we’re still doing the not shooting thing!
25
Farce of a race #f1
75
Big Al retweeted
I have not seen a better explanation of Manchester City's case.
94
2,260
114
9,709
752,708
Today I have written to the head of the UK Football Policing Unit after its disgraceful attempt to link alcohol with the Hillsborough disaster following the Prime Minister’s call to ease restrictions at football matches. Alcohol did not cause Hillsborough. The behaviour of supporters did not cause or contribute to the disaster. These are the authoritative, factual conclusions of the inquests and the independent investigations. They are not matters of opinion. Thirty-seven years on, when will policing authorities finally accept the truth and stop perpetuating the lies and smears created in the aftermath of the disaster? Enough is enough. #JFT97
80
815
30
3,122
185,798
That was (mostly) fun #lfc
41
Big Ron channelling his inner Bobby #lfc
35
Kerkez gives me Moreno shivers!! #lfc
65
Who’s drafting your posts??? “are” !!!
This quoted post is unavailable.
10
🚨Jamie Redknapp reacts to the penalty appeal Spurs were denied against Newcastle United after Marmoush’s challenge, Law 12 isn’t complicated. VAR is supposed to check it: 🗣️ “I’m still waiting for someone to tell me why that isn’t a penalty. Marmoush is first to the ball. First. That’s the whole thing. Once the attacker gets there first, the defender has one job: win the ball. Malick Thiaw doesn’t win the ball. He goes through the bottom of Marmoush’s foot. That’s not a coming-together. That’s not ‘both going for it’. That’s a kick. Inside the box. Law 12 is not complicated. A foul is when you kick or attempt to kick an opponent. Contact on the foot that takes the player off the ball is a foul. Doesn’t matter if it’s ‘only a little bit’. Doesn’t matter if he stays on his feet for half a second then goes down. The contact is there, it’s late, and it stops him playing the ball. That’s a penalty. Then we get to VAR. This is exactly what the protocol is for. Clear and obvious error. The on-field referee misses it — fine, it happens at speed. That’s why you’ve got two people in Stockley Park with every angle. They should have said: ‘Have another look.’ Send Peter Bankes to the monitor. Let him see the foot going through Marmoush. Instead they wave it through like nothing happened. That’s not supporting the referee. That’s hiding. And let’s not pretend this is some grey area we’ve never seen before. That’s the part that winds people up. It’s not just the decision. It’s the pattern. Tottenham can have a player taken out in the box and it somehow never quite meets the threshold. Everyone else gets the benefit. That’s not consistency. That’s a different set of rules depending on the shirt. Marmoush did nothing wrong. He attacked the ball, he got there, he got kicked. The law says penalty. VAR protocol says check it. Neither happened. And then we’ll all sit here next week talking about ‘clear and obvious’ like it means something. I’ve played in that stadium. I know what it feels like when you think you’ve earned a spot-kick and they just… ignore it. That’s not a soft one. That’s a proper one. And they bottled it.”
2
6
1
34
5,493
That wall… must’ve been only 8 yards by the time Dom took the shot #lfc
104
Big Al retweeted
“Ger her Hijab off!” A Muslim woman was repeatedly punched in the face and her Hijab ripped off in Cardiff, Wales. “Today my wife was attacked in broad daylight in Cardiff. Before the attack, they followed her and chased her in their car, shouting abuse at her from the car. After being threatened and followed, she took a picture of their car. When they clocked that she had taken the picture, they ran towards her, shouting abuse, and attacked her. She was punched repeatedly. Both of them held her while shouting "get her scarf off" and ripped her hijab from her head. All in front of children.”
535
4,313
177
12,340
655,131
Has anyone else got a horrible echo on Wildcards? @TheAnfieldWrap
5
7
4,117
Looked great for 30 minutes… unfortunately the game lasts 90! #lfc
154
Are we sure these have been training?
28
Dear @JeremyClarkson I saw this on my feed on another platform and instantly thought you needed to see it. "Jeremy Clarkson thinks people who receive benefits should have to send a weekly thank you email to a randomly chosen working person, explaining what they did with the money, or have their payments stopped. So here is mine. If you’d like to give it a share to help Jeremy see it, that would be great. Dear Jezza, Thank you for your concern about my contribution to society. I should say first that you were aiming this at young people you believe are sitting at home doing nothing. But you wrote it as a blanket rule applying to everyone whose benefits are paid. That includes more than thirteen million pensioners, millions of people who receive benefits while working, who may find themselves being ordered to thank another benefit claimant, and me. I receive PIP. That money goes towards the Motability car I use to travel to work. It is not a free car. It is not even my car. I exchange the mobility part of my PIP to lease it. The car takes the lot. Which is awkward, because that same payment is also meant to help cover the additional costs of being disabled, including a wheelchair that is actually usable for my job and hearing aids that allow me to do it. There is nothing left for either. I chose the thing that gets me to work. That car enables me to work and, because I can work, I now pay considerably more in tax than I have ever received in PIP. But my contribution does not end with my own tax bill. I have built programmes that hundreds of people now use to earn a living. They pay tax too. Those programmes have helped thousands of people overcome anxiety, return to their lives and, in many cases, return to work. Then there are all the people supported by the coaches and practitioners I have trained. That is what disability support can do when it is designed to enable people rather than humiliate them. My PIP did not disappear into some great benefits black hole. It helped provide the transport that allowed me to work, build a business, create opportunities for other people and contribute far more than I could ever have done without it. But as we are exchanging thank you letters, perhaps you could send me one too. I paid my television licence throughout the years the BBC gave you the platform that made you famous. I now pay for Amazon Prime, which helps fund the television programme about your farm. I do not choose to watch it. But that is how society works, Jeremy. We all contribute towards things we may never personally use because the entire country would fall apart if every payment had to provide us with an individual benefit. Perhaps you could also thank the taxpayers whose public services and infrastructure support your businesses. And while you have the stationery out, perhaps you could explain the farm. In 2021, you told The Times that avoiding inheritance tax was “the critical thing” in your decision to buy land. In 2024, when that became rather inconvenient, you said it had never been true. You claimed you had actually bought the farm because you wanted somewhere to shoot and that tax avoidance had simply sounded like a better story at the time. I am not sure which version helps your argument. It is funny how public support and clever tax arrangements are treated as perfectly respectable when they benefit wealthy people. Yet when a disabled person receives help to leave the house, go to work and participate in society, you think they should be made to perform gratitude. So thank you for your concern, Jezza. I hope my licence fee, Amazon subscription, taxes and contribution to the economy have all been gratefully received. Please send your thank you letter weekly, along with a full breakdown of how you spent the money. If it is not sufficiently fulsome and effusive, I assume your income will be stopped. That is only fair."
367
3,082
192
9,328
224,482
Again!!
Replying to @JamesPearceLFC
Nyoni the standout player
30
Big Al retweeted
Rest in peace, Kevin Keegan ❤️
520
4,733
461
32,978
1,383,316