I ❤️ 🚴🏽,🕺🏽,🛫,📚, underdogs, & business || Manager with @EYNews and VC @ScrappyCapital || Aspiring Renaissance man

New Jersey / New York
Joined October 2009
My twitter resume aka thread of threads covering: -Traits of successful people -Internet sins & business pet peeves -Public policy -Life as a traveling consultant -Podcast pull quotes -Yang2020 Post-Mortem -Niche Humor -Beliefs strong enough to warrant the use of 👏👏 👇👇
11
2
2
20
Those who diet have an obligation to those who starve
53
Hi @Uber / @UberEats started a chat about an order issue but I’m stuck talking to your AI bot that doesn’t solve the issue. Can we DM and solve this? Not sure which account to message
4
1
273
Sex is great but have you ever gotten an out of the blue facetime and turns out your friend is engaged?
102
I spent 48 hours in SF hanging out with billionaires, data labs and AI founders and execs running $1B to $100B companies. My observations: 1. Sooo MANY stories of data brokers making like $2M a WEEK selling company data to labs. I can't tell if it's the beginning or a bubble, and I kept wondering which niches are left. Digging into it actively. 2. At dinner, someone asked the table, "If a new model drops next month, does your company get better or worse?" HALF the table went quiet! I think that's the best question to ask about any AI startup right now. 3. The bar people talk about now is hitting $1B in revenue in 12 months (I guess that's the new unicorn?). What I didn't hear much about is retention. AI revenue can come in fast and leave fast, and I think we're going to see a lot of stories of AI companies with huge revenue and terrible retention. 4. It's pretty clear we're living through the reinvention of the computer. The model is the CPU, the harness is the operating system, and skills and plugins are the apps. Thinking about it that way makes it easier to see where the whitespace is. 5. We're maybe 12 months from an agent that can watch you work for a week and then do your job without any instructions. The screen recording plus agent memory plus local model combination makes this possible right now. 6. Agent harnesses feel like the new GPT wrappers, in a good way, especially vertical ones. The best teams I talked to treat the model as swappable. One founder walked me through routing different models to different jobs: one for taste and visuals, a cheaper one for the everyday stuff, another for text. They use prompts they can move across models over fine-tuning, and A/B test the output on what users actually do with it: do they edit it, export it, share it? A vertical harness is basically four things: the connectors for that industry's data, evals written by people who know the work, rules for what the agent can and can't touch, and a clean screen for a human to review. The model is maybe 20% of it. 7. There's a lot of reverse engineering going on/cloning going on more than I've ever seen. People are decompiling software and rebuilding it with agents, and someone showed a suite of like 10 apps that are worth $5B+ each all that he cloned open source. Me and everyone are still thinking through what it means when software gets this easy to copy. 8. My guess is the value moves to data. If the software can be rebuilt quickly, what's worth paying for in a legacy SaaS company is the years of customer data and workflows inside it. Some SaaS companies are secretly data companies. Gets me thinking about how do you truly value data for this saas companies? Like if we were buying these dying saas companies at 2x ARR before (as example), maybe there is a better metric. Idk, just thinking out loud here. 9. It feels like a good chunk of legacy software won't make it to the agentic era, especially anything built around people clicking through a lot of screens. 10. Every company I talked to wants to pipe its internal data into one place and expose it to agents through MCP. Then they look at the data and realize it's a mess: five versions of the same customer, old Slack channels, PDFs nobody can search. Cleaning that up feels like a big consulting opportunity! 11. A lot of founders are building the basic building blocks for agents: APIs, data layers and tools. Some of the companies I saw barely have a UI because the main user is an agent. I really believe the startups that build primitives to this agentic era will do extremely well. Building blocks is the best way to think about it. 12. Labs can get plenty of training data, but it's harder to get real examples of agents failing inside companies. Whoever has those logs has something valuable. 13. Someone running a big consumer company told me the next fight is over memory. The model that remembers the most about you wins, and the smartest model matters less than people think. 14. Physical AI came up a lot. Astra I think was the first model that got people into AI can actually do CAD, and I think a lot of people are thinking what does vibe manufacturing really look like. The line I keep thinking about came from a robotics founder: the hardest problems in AI are deployment problems now, not research problems. Their robots work on their own, call a human when they get stuck, and every one of those calls becomes training data. 15. Cybersecurity companies are having a moment and are actually cool companies to build now, especially the ones that clean up after a breach. Every agent with access to your systems is a new door into your company, and a lot of those doors were left open. 16. Some startups are worth more dead than alive now. A shutdown company with 5 years of Slack, email and code can get paid for licensing all of it. I wouldn't be surprised if founders start factoring that into when they shut down. 17. People are starting to talk about monetizing the agent web. It feels really early, but when the most popular user of the internet is an agent, what startups should you be building? 18. I think agent insurance is coming. Once an agent makes an expensive mistake, insurers will want audits before they cover anyone. 19. Several people said the hire they want most is someone with taste who can write evals. The models are getting good at generating ideas, so the hard part is judging which ones are good. 20. New trend I observed: startup raises VC, uses venture dollars to become a creator, startup fails, founder falls back on being a full-time creator and incubates other products bootstrapped. 21. Getting SIGNIFICANT distribution is HARD right now. Founders are sponsoring buses, buying billboards like crazy and throwing parties with famous DJs to get noticed. Kinda feels dotcom era in that sense. Attention is what's scarce! The growth guy going viral sharing his UGC strategy from Wispr Flow is a good example. It's the sauce everyone wants, and I truly believe there are probably only 50 people on the planet who know how to scale these types of businesses efficiently in this era. Always good to get that dose of SF. I felt sooo lucky to have such an incredible trip during such an incredible time in building businesses. Surreal in so many ways. Happy to be home and locked in. Until next time!
920
1,972
572
21,099
2,433,360
Startup idea: neural link like servivr that gives you a shock everytime you walk into a grocery store without a bag yet you have 10 reusable bags in your car Probably only viable in NJ and other bagless places
1
1
80
100% of the time I call someone and then announce my wife is also here the person I am speaking to’s voice always goes up atleast an octave. It’s lovely that they like her better
109
Startup idea: chrome extension that tells you if someone’s “business” is a business or a “business” and they are just cosplaying entrepreneur Nothing wrong with a hobby but let’s not pretend all advice should be held equally.
1
1
94
*an AI that does this. Everything is AI these days.
21
Mike Smith retweeted
Do you see someone not posting about a hot button issue as “silence” or nothing to infer. Had a lot of conversations in the last few days with people about this
0%Silence! Infer bad
0%It’s just posting, relax
0 votes • Final results
1
73
Mike Smith retweeted
You should go to jail for adding sugar to fruit products
1
96
Hi @Clear stuck in an endless loop with your email support. Can we DM. Trying to activate a guest pass. I email the support and it just copies and pastes my email and sends it back. Sent you a DM
1
96
Hi @Clear having trouble with your email support. Sent you a DM. Hoping you can help
93
Mike Smith retweeted
Guys. Please. Go through the deck. I cannot emphasize enough how much it decreases the chances of getting an investor over the line when you decide to "just chat" with no visuals. How much time do you spend prepping for a raise? Between data room, deck design, narrative creation, etc? Usually 50-100 hrs? Why in the world would you then, at the ten yard line of a fundraising process (the weeks when you are actually pitching), decide to go about things in a way that yields lower levels of communication efficiency and information transfer? Especially if it is a pre-seed/seed/A raise where things are still very much being presented in the absence of empirical proof or data. Maybe 1-2% of the population in tech/startups is capable of running a 30-60 minute meeting with absolutely no materials and captivating a room with nothing but their own voice. For everyone else, your materials are a lever used to drive people towards the outcome you seek. Not using all tools available to you is silly! I promise you, whatever downside you think may come from presenting a pitch deck - coming across as robotic, rehearsed, so on and so forth - pales in comparison to the downside of not being able to control the conversation.
"I have a deck but I'd rather just chat if that is cool with you"
34
4
4
117
42,584
Since getting a mortgage I have gotten an uptick in these solicitations. I know they are mostly are a scam but they look pretty official. Sad that they are able to name check my mortgage lender and imply some coverage is going to lapse and I’m open to risk.
1
132
Mike Smith retweeted
Looks like everyone on X is talking about burnout so I'll tell you what I think too. My father, who passed away 3 years ago, was a psychiatrist. Growing up, I was constantly exposed to medical topics and often found myself reading the manuals that were always left around the house (yes, he was quite messy). I did not become a doctor but I have always felt a connection to the field. In pharmacology, there is this interesting concept called the “dose-response relationship”. This is the idea that the effect of a drug is directly related to the dose you take. Too little of it, and nothing happens. Too much, and it can be toxic. The key is therefore to find that sweet spot where you get the most benefit without tipping over into harm. Over the years, I discovered that this principle does not just apply to medicine, but to almost everything in life, including work. If you take on too little responsibility, you will get bored, disengaged, or never really push yourself to grow, but if you overload yourself - if you change the dose and frequency of your work too drastically - you burn out, lose passion and end up resenting the thing you once enjoyed. Your response is in the dose.
2
4
2
13
1,973
Do you see someone not posting about a hot button issue as “silence” or nothing to infer. Had a lot of conversations in the last few days with people about this
0%Silence! Infer bad
0%It’s just posting, relax
0 votes • Final results
1
73
One more time for the people in the back: Just because you make a linkedin page for it does not mean its an actual company
55
Mike Smith retweeted
My mental model of AI is "dishwasher for the mind". I can offload various boring or repetitive tasks while I do other things (like volunteer at my kids school).
1
2
10
777