Steve retweeted
BREAKING: Richard Marles just told the diggers their spiritual home is a wine cellar and a few old generals who “liked hanging out there.”
Victoria Barracks Sydney has been continuous military ground since 1840.
Generations marched out those gates to Sudan, both World Wars, and everything since. RSL NSW calls it the spiritual home of the Australian Army. Chris Minns is fighting to keep it.
Nearly 95,000 people have signed James Paterson’s petition.
Marles’ response?
“It is not my priority for Defence to be a heritage organisation”
“It’s not my priority to see Defence manage the oldest wine cellar in Australia”
Putting the site “in the hands of the Diggers is actually quite wrong”
The idea Defence is best placed to preserve it is “plainly ridiculous”
Then he waved the actual soldiers away: they’re in Townsville, Darwin and Brisbane.
The barracks should be “liberated” for Sydneysiders.
That’s not estate management. That’s contempt.
He wants to turf serving personnel, cadets and command staff into an office tower two kilometres away while flogging a 185 year old operational base so Finance can chase a fire sale estimate.
Heritage protections already exist. Public access already happens. None of that required sneering at the people who wore the uniform.
If a Defence Minister can reduce the Army’s oldest living site to a cellar and a few retired generals, he has already told you what he thinks of the tradition those diggers actually fought for.
It’s all about money to them.
Tell hell with our history and our Diggers.
Steve retweeted
Alleged sanity post about how we One Nation supporters are just a bunch of hateful morons, so I felt compelled to reply.
I was standing in a supermarket queue recently when a middle-aged woman put half her groceries back.
Nothing extravagant. Meat. Fruit. A few things for the kids.
“I’ll get them next week,” she said. Then she tapped her card and waited to see if it declined.
And that tells you something about Australia’s supposed “mad rush to the right” that apparently hasn’t occurred to Paul Williams.
Maybe people didn’t suddenly lose their empathy.
Maybe they ran out of it.
For years Australians have been told to care about everybody and everything except the consequences of government policy on their own lives.
Care about the international student.
Care about population growth.
Care about every new identity group.
Care about the latest symbolic political cause.
Care about changing the language you use.
Care about achieving ideological targets.
But struggling to pay your mortgage?
Can’t find a rental?
Watching your electricity bill climb?
Can’t get your kid into a doctor?
Sitting in traffic while infrastructure fails to keep pace with population growth?
Worried that your children may never afford a home?
Apparently asking whether government policy contributed to any of that makes you selfish.
That's not empathy.
It’s a demand for empathy to flow in one direction only.
And Australians are exhausted.
Cost of living is currently the number-one issue Australians nominate, followed by housing. Immigration has also returned to the top five.
Even the ABC's analysis of One Nation voters found cost of living is a major concern, while immigration distinguishes them more strongly from other voting groups.
So perhaps instead of diagnosing millions of Australians as stupid, poorly educated, hateful and lacking the emotional development of a five-year-old, it might be worth asking why they are angry.
Maybe people moving away from the political left aren't saying:
“I don't care about other people.”
Maybe they're saying:
“For decades, when the consequences landed on me, you didn't care either.”
You don't get to spend years dismissing people's concerns about housing, migration, energy, crime, cost of living and social cohesion — then suddenly rediscover “empathy” when those same people start voting against you.
And this isn't some tiny fringe that can simply be sneered away.
Recent polling has shown extraordinary disruption to Australia's traditional party system, with One Nation recording support comparable with or above the major parties in some polls.
Even the ABC has interviewed migrants now considering One Nation because they believe the major parties have failed on housing, infrastructure, migration and cost-of-living pressures.
Perhaps that's the story worth investigating.
Not:
“Why have Australians become horrible?”
But:
“What happened that made so many Australians conclude the political establishment stopped listening to them?”
People aren't obligated to keep voting for a system they believe is failing them just to demonstrate that they're compassionate.
And for many Australians, One Nation's rise represents something the political establishment hasn't given them for a very long time:
Hope that the two-party duopoly can actually be disrupted.
You can call those voters selfish.
You can call them ignorant.
You can tell them they're on the “wrong side of history”.
Or you could finally listen to them.
Because perhaps Australians haven't lost their empathy at all.
Perhaps they've simply stopped accepting the proposition that caring about everyone else requires continually sacrificing themselves.
-Not a professor at a Uni, just a girl hungry for political change, and a Government to take their boot off our necks.
Sanity in Murdoch publications is rare so should be shared 👇🏽
Opinion: Preposterous political ploy selfish Australians are falling for
I was standing in a shop queue recently when a middle-aged bloke – clearly angry at life and wanting the world to know it – picked up a collection tin for women’s cancer research.
“Why is it always about women?” he groaned. “Why don’t they have anything for men?”
And that tells you everything you need to know about Australia’s mad rush to the loony right of politics.
First, it shows a wilful ignorance of reality. Cancer research affecting males (exclusively or primarily) actually receives more funding than that affecting females.
Second, it suggests a lack of both logic and empathy. Too many people cannot see – sometimes literally – beyond their own noses. Even a child knows proof of non-existence is not found in an object’s absence. Indeed, a lack of empathy is often a function of a poor education.
Either way, too many Australians lack the basic empathy to see another point of view. Are striking workers greedy, or might they have a legitimate complaint about pay and conditions?
The Swiss theorist Jean Piaget – pounded into every teaching student – found that well-rounded humans should be empathetic by age five.
But I guess Piaget didn’t spend a lot of time in Australia, where debate rails between kicking out foreign students (despite their $55bn annual boost to the local economy) and dumping protections for LGBTQIA+ people whose rights in no way subtract from yours.
Think about it. Does a beer manufacturer supporting trans people’s rights make your day harder? And would your daily life really be worse if a First Nations Voice to Parliament offered advice, on Indigenous matters only, that politicians could so easily reject? What is it about our inability to see ourselves in the shoes of another person – someone even more vulnerable than us who, in all likelihood, is also the battling the cost of living?
As hard as life is for you, there are countless for whom it’s much harder. Every day there are Australians – law-abiding taxpayers who love their kids and their pets and who keep their head down – who are forced to battle racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia and cruel stereotypes around disability, autism and mental illness.
And it’s through this preposterous hatred of others that populist politicians hoodwink angry Australians – just for votes and the election-funding dollars that come with them. And we’re falling for it.
So you’re not alone if you’ve noticed people just don’t care any more. Studies have found human empathy across Western civilisation has almost halved in recent decades, fuelled initially by the individualistic, dog-eat-dog free market of the 1980s, and accelerated by social media networks that position us literally at the centre of our own digital world.
Who cares about the international student – paying dearly to study at an Australian university in order to build a better life back home – as long as we can post pictures of our holiday. Be honest, when was the last time you dropped cash into a charity tin or tips jar?
I’ve been thinking about blinkered views since the recent student protests against One Nation. Public comment was appalling in its opposition not just to what young people were saying, but in students’ right to say it. We have the right to respectfully express counter-opinions indicating where protesters are wrong on logic, but we can’t demand others be stripped of a right to lawful protest.
I guarantee public opinion would be very different if young One Nation members marched in support of Australia Day or the flag. While there are legitimate questions around school students being off-campus during school hours, Article 15 of the UN’s Convention on the Rights of the Child protect the right of under-18s to protest lawfully. And shouting slogans is lawful when not inciting violence.
To deny this is to deny a long history of young people changing the world for the better. I’m old enough to remember grey-haired politicians warning that university students were dangerous communists for opposing a Vietnam War they said was vital to Australia’s security. Look how that turned out.
Young people have led anti-apartheid demonstrations in South Africa despite the risk of injury and death and, more recently, have been at the forefront of climate change and same-sex-marriage movements.
In short, young people – so easily painted as know-nothing bludgers with no life experience – have always been on the right side of history.
So take off your blinkers and pop on your empathy specs, and see what side of history you want to be on.
- Paul Williams is an associate professor at Griffith University
Steve retweeted
🚨 WOW!! Argentina President Javier Milei just walked up to the mic at the United Nations and RIPPED THEM TO THEIR FACES
"It's become a USELESS organization whose only purpose is to sustain a caste of fatefully arrogant PARASITES masquerading as well-intentioned bureaucrats!" 🔥🔥🔥
"The alleged 'defenders of human rights' have sheltered bloodthirsty dictatorships and regimes that stone women in the streets!"
"Good people do not think about controlling the lives of their fellow human beings."
"Those who were supposed to guarantee collective security and human rights failed in their task. Instead, they allowed chaos, violence and international terrorism to flourish."
YOU ARE A LEGEND, @JMilei 👏🏻
Seems like President Trump and Milei both had the BEST speeches at the UN. Pure nationalist first, globalist last
The UN is filled with hypocrites who cozy up to Islamism and 3rd world mass migration, while attacking the nations who want to retain their own borders and their national interests
Those days are over. MAGA! 🇺🇸🇦🇷
Steve retweeted
They took his guns after he SAVED his wife's life!
Spread the word, because the NSW Police do NOT want this to go viral.
NSW Police have taken Keith Blessing's firearms license away, declaring him to be 'unfit', just months after he used a legally owned rifle to save himself and his wife from being murdered.
This is LITERALLY disarming the law abiding for the protection of criminals, and in the case of Keith and Di Blessing, it's making them defenceless if someone decides to come back and get revenge on them.
This is unacceptable, we need to turn this into an absolute humiliation for the NSW Police, force them into a reversal and an apology, and show the powers-that-be that the people of Australia are done being disarmed for the protection of criminals.
Thankyou to Mark Banasiak MLC for bringing this story to my attention.
Support my work as I keep you up to date with stories like this one by buying me a coffee and checking out my books, DVDs, and all my merch, here: store.topherfield.com/
Steve retweeted
My blood is BOILING.
Keith Blessing has gone from HERO to UNFIT in 3 months? I don't think so.
Remember this story?
Keith Blessing saved both himself AND his wife from a violent home invasion using his legally owned rifle.
Premier Minns called Keith a HERO, the NSW Police praised him, both he and his wife survived what would otherwise have been a fatal attack, thanks to Keith and his firearms.
They were the VICTIMS of violence.
Now? NSW Police have REVOKED HIS LICENSE and taken his guns, declaring he is 'Unfit' to be a gun owner in NSW.
This needs to be the biggest story in Australia right now. Never before have we had such a CLEAR example of VICTIMS being punished, and the LAW ABIDING being disarmed for the PROTECTION OF CRIMINALS.
You'd better believe I'm angry, you should be too.
Steve retweeted
In June 2026, 75 year old Keith Blessing & his 72-year-old wife, Di, were critically injured during a horrific home invasion at their Torrington, NSW property by a Violent knife wielding home invader.
Keith was repeatedly stabbed & suffered severe abdomen wounds, Keith managed to retrieve his fully licensed legal firearm & shot the violent intruder as he attempted to re-enter their home again & finish the couple off.
NSW Premier Chris Minns initially called Keith a ‘hero’.
Local NSW Police commanders praised the couple's bravery under life-threatening circumstances & extreme duress.
Police are now punishing the victim for literally defending his life.
Self preservation & fighting for your survival is NORMAL.
What is NOT normal is a Government expecting you to get stabbed to death, sacrifice yourself, lay down & die & not defend your life & the lives of your family under threat.
We need to reignite the Self Defence debate & Castle Law.
The Government allows crime & violence to spiral out of control, removes our means of self defence then punishes those that refuse to be murdered by criminals that the Government allows to roam our streets.
This is abuse.
They won’t even allow women to carry pepper spray.
Enough is enough.
Steve retweeted
Comply or go to JAIL
Labor are crushing our right to free speech, AGAIN 😳😳😳
There have been at least FIVE major federal legislative packages, or amendments since being elected in 2022, that have been clear free speech restriction attempts
- The Under 16 Social Media Ban
- TWO “misinformation/disinformation” bills
- The Hate Speech Laws
- Now the Online Safety/Digital Duty of Care Bill
But as the Nat’s have pointed out it get worse because Labor snuck in:
😳Giving the eSafety Commissioner the power to summons people
😳Make them take an oath and answer all questions, which removes the protection against self incrimination
😳😳😳if you don't comply, thanks to Labor, you can be fined $364,000 AND sent to jail for 12 months
But if you are a “journalist” you are exempt, funny that
Steve retweeted
Dear ABC,
If you're looking for opinions on the Census Data, here's mine.
I'm a former data analyst (crime), but I also designed a data matching algorithm still used today by Victoria Police because of its effectiveness, so I have some professional skin in the game.
I am unable to defend the 2026 prioritisation of Census questions.
How does "We urgently need nationally exhaustive information about whether someone identifies as straight, gay, bisexual or another sexual orientation"...
While we didn't obtain nationally exhaustive information about whether households can access a GP,
whether they have unmet childcare needs,
whether working people commute three days rather than five,
whether households are involuntarily overcrowded because they cannot find housing.
Or these types of questions, which would surely be hard to argue against from a prioritisation perspective of best value for data capture, and best opportunity for Australians to provide a holistic picture of their lives;
Citizenship / visa or residency status (because Country of birth doesn't tell government whether someone is a citizen, permanent resident, international student, temporary worker, etc. Those populations can impose quite different infrastructure/service demands).
Year a non-Australian-born person obtained permanent residency/citizenship (because there is much better longitudinal information about settlement and integration than birthplace alone)
Primary mode of transport normally used (Census asks about journey-to-work circumstances, but hybrid/WFH has made a single Census-day travel snapshot much less informative than it once was).
Housing capacity/occupancy pressure (Bedrooms alone is crude. Ask whether people are sharing bedrooms, using converted garages/studies, or accommodating people who would otherwise live elsewhere. That's enormously relevant during a housing shortage).
Reason adults remain in/shared household (Understanding drivers of Financial necessity, caring, cultural preference, disability, housing unavailability etc...would distinguish genuine housing stress from chosen multigenerational living & inform other pressure points th Government can focus on).
Internet quality/access (As infrastructure in its own right, particularly with WFH, telehealth and online government services).
Household energy characteristics (Solar, battery, EV charging, gas/electric heating etc... would be extraordinarily useful for electricity-grid infrastructure planning)
Many of these variables have extremely obvious relationships with hospitals, roads, rail, schools, housing, childcare, workforce participation and infrastructure investment.
The ABS also removed “number of children ever born” from the 2026 Census (it will return in 2031).... while introducing gender and sexual orientation.
From a strategic-planning perspective, fertility and family formation are among the most consequential long-term variables imaginable. They affect future school enrolments, workforce size, dependency ratios, healthcare demand and population ageing.
This missed opportunity to capture all those above mentioned data sets to inform in policy/planning areas isn't just a shame, it's borderline failure of professional judgement.
We removed access to data that could inform those things, and replaced it with gender questions.
Who managed to convince a ABS strategic review board
“We don't have enough justification to collect fertility information every Census, but sexual orientation warrants universal national collection every five years”??
I'd love to see the cost-benefit/consequences methodology behind that decision !
The reality is the Census can only ask so many questions, and we should prioritise the ones that provide the greatest benefit for planning Australia's future, not pander to the "feelings" of a tiny majority of people that got warm and fuzzy because a national census survey "affirmed" their gender.
Thank you, if you read this.
ABC Online would like to hear from people about their experiences with the census...
abc.net.au/news/2026-08-11/2…
A few media outlets get banned from some press conferences and they blow up like it's a crime against humanity.
Its time they had a look internally at the poor standards that have led them here.
The MSM don't believe in truth or accountability anymore.
news.com.au/national/politic…
Steve retweeted
This wasn't allowed in public incase it offended anyone. So please don't retweet it. Thanks 🙏dutchbarn.com
Steve retweeted
🚨 Julian Hill is a total clown!
This out of touch Labor hack is melting down because One Nation dares to cut wasteful spending and fix the NDIS disaster.
He smears them for wanting to protect working Aussies from sky high costs - “cutting wages”?
Nah, Jules, how about stopping the endless tax grabs and energy bills crushing families!
Abolish bloated bureaucracy? YES.
Streamline health and stop the duplication? Common sense.
Paid parental leave tweaks and fiscal reality? Not “Cooker stuff” - it’s responsible government after years of Labor/Greens waste blowing out the budget.
Hill’s defending the indefensible while multiculturalism fails and NDIS costs explode.
Labor’s the real threat to Aussie workers with their open borders, green madness, and debt addiction.
Pauline Hanson is right - put Australia First, not more handouts and virtue
signalling!
What a disgrace, Julian.
Drop a RT if you’re sick of this garbage!
Now he needs to convince his colleagues. I fear the moderates have too much control, and deep down would rather see Labor win, than work with ON.
Angus Taylor is one of the sharpest minds in Parliament and he’s turning the Liberal ship around bit by bit.
Australia cannot continue to suffer from living standard drops, high inflation, a housing crisis, and a government under siege from global elites trying to censor us.
Our focus however shouldn’t be on other political movements. It must be on the real job of putting Australia first and getting rid of this Labor disaster.
Steve retweeted
We can't stop climate change. So why are we making ourselves poorer trying?
If we want flood defences, resilient infrastructure, and the ability to adapt to a changing climate, we need a prosperous economy first.
Instead, we're pursuing policies like Net Zero that make us poorer, while the planet continues to warm because the world's biggest emitters have no intention of following our example.
Steve retweeted
SHARE THIS EVERYWHERE
The Cookers and Crackpots have had enough of the Liars, Gaslighters and Traitors
Labor, the Greens the fake independents and the ABC have UNLEASHED A BEAST. That beast is going to fire you all next election
Steve retweeted
Replying to @MurrayWatt
Was this the part where Albo belittled a 39 year old who can’t afford to purchase a home, or the part where the Sex Discrimination Commissioner argued that men deserve pregnancy protections in law, or the part where you said it was pathetic to ask questions about your party’s broken promises to the electorate? Sorry, just trying figure out which ‘work for Australians’ it is that you’re referring to here.
Steve retweeted
Aussies: “We need to minimise immigration.”
Gov: “No, we aren’t doing that.”
Aussies: “Rent is too expensive.”
Gov: “Good point. We’ll increase costs for landlords so they have to charge you more.”
Aussies..."Electricity is too expensive"
Gov..."We're committed to net zero...regardless of the cost to you!"
Aussies: “I can’t keep up with the cost of living.”
Gov: “Too bad. We can’t stop spending more than we’re making, so inflation will keep rising.”
Aussies: “The NDIS is scamming taxpayers out of millions every year.”
Gov: “Yeah, but we don’t want to offend the NDIS scammers — they might call us racist.”
Aussies: “Okay fine, we gave you a chance. We’re voting @OneNationAus.”
Gov: “You filthy, uneducated racist.”

























