
@Most_Penitenti
iAccount based inUnited States
About this account
- Account based in
- United States
- Connected via
- United States App Store
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
Catholic Nationalist. Avid reader and somehow manages to always be right. Your resident biologist. Suave Night Owl.
USA
Joined September 2020
- Tweets457
- Following109
- Followers18
- Likes456
You say that like it’s a bad thing. Also, don’t forget who killed 3,000 Americans in an unprovoked terrorist attack.
Congress is for Americans only.
Inchon Landing, Korea
September 15, 1950
1st Marine Division
Baldomero "Punchy" Lopez leading his men over the sea wall at Inchon. Shortly after this photo was taken, he was preparing to throw a grenade when he was shot, causing him to drop the grenade.
He instantly jumped on his own grenade to protect the Marines around him.
He was posthumously awarded the Medal of Honor.
American Hero.
OJ Simpson for women.
These juror interviews are extraordinary. They are admitting openly that they disregarded the law entirely for the sake of letting Clancy off the hook. There’s no other way to read it.
One juror says she originally wanted to vote guilty but changed her mind so that “Lindsay could get the help she needs.” That is a clear violation of the law. They were supposed to make a determination solely about guilt or innocence. They were not there to make sure anyone “gets help.”
Another juror says she voted not guilty because the prosecution never produced “character witnesses” proving Clancy was a “bad mother.” The problem is that A) killing your children IS definitive evidence that you’re a bad mother, and B) the prosecution would not have been allowed to call those kinds of witnesses. A witness solely testifying that Clancy was a bad mother would have been purely prejudicial. So this juror acquitted because the prosecution failed to provide evidence that they weren’t allowed to provide and which would have been irrelevant anyway. Extraordinary. This same juror even admitted that it was a “fact” that Clancy “viciously killed her children.” The word vicious literally means “done maliciously and with intent.” So if that’s a fact then they were obligated to vote guilty. But they didn’t.
Meanwhile another juror swooned over the defense attorney’s “entertaining” demeanor. And another one said that all of the facts of the case — “everything,” her words — “proved” that Clancy “loved her children.” Apparently strangling your children to death, in this juror’s mind, does not at all call your love for them into question.
Just a collection of the most morally obtuse idiots ever assembled. Amazing.
The Penitent Everyman retweeted
“Happy Birthday Mary, Queen of Victories!” - President Donald J. Trump
This is something few non-military people understand. When you sign the dotted line, you sign away your constitutional rights.
Replying to @Villgecrazylady @HfromSTL
Let me explain how the military works: You are not allowed freedom of speech or of opinion. You don’t have Constitutional rights, you are subject to the UCMJ.
So he is guilty of conduct unbecoming at least and probably failure to obey orders.
He can be relieved of duty and court-martialed.
The only reason there are other “sovereign” countries in the world is because the US allows it.
This quoted post is unavailable.





















