BTC 🤝 SOL $DOG @InfinitySerps Head Mod
Earth
Joined August 2015
- Tweets1.4K
- Following647
- Followers335
- Likes3.8K
Monocular retweeted
I am speechless @GracyBitget
Bitget just caused another price dislocation event for $DOG by announcing $DOG's delisting at the same time that withdrawals are suspended
This is now the second time in less than a month that this has happened and it is starting to become harder to believe that it is not intentional
This has had an immediate and direct negative impact on $DOG's price
An exchange should not delist a coin while simultaneously blocking users from withdrawing
Bitget is effectively holding $DOG hostage and forcing users who hold $DOG to sell below market price in order to gain access to their funds
This is starting to feel like a form of extortion
The price difference between $DOG on Bitget and other exchanges is a direct reflection of the low levels of trust that users have in Bitget right now
Please address this immediately
The $DOG Army is VERY unhappy about this and will not tolerate being treated this way
Monocular retweeted
There is still 1.73B $DOG on Bitget worth $1.57M
@GracyBitget has shown extreme levels of negligence and disregard for her users and can no longer be trusted
Withdraw your $DOG from Bitget immediately and either self custody in Xverse or move to a real exchange such as Kraken
I am speechless @GracyBitget
Bitget just caused another price dislocation event for $DOG by announcing $DOG's delisting at the same time that withdrawals are suspended
This is now the second time in less than a month that this has happened and it is starting to become harder to believe that it is not intentional
This has had an immediate and direct negative impact on $DOG's price
An exchange should not delist a coin while simultaneously blocking users from withdrawing
Bitget is effectively holding $DOG hostage and forcing users who hold $DOG to sell below market price in order to gain access to their funds
This is starting to feel like a form of extortion
The price difference between $DOG on Bitget and other exchanges is a direct reflection of the low levels of trust that users have in Bitget right now
Please address this immediately
The $DOG Army is VERY unhappy about this and will not tolerate being treated this way
Monocular retweeted
ICYMI: Magic Eden got the $ME class claims against it THROWN OUT on a motion to dismiss.
Friendly reminder, a buyer alleged Magic Eden hyped its token, pivoted to a crypto casino, and watched the price fall 98%, from $5.63 to $0.12. He was staking, so he could not sell.
Judge Cogan never reached whether that was deceptive. He dismissed Euclid because the WALLET TERMS WAIVED CLASS ACTIONS, and that waiver killed the only reason those claims were in federal court.
This is Pagan v. Euclid Labs, 1:26-cv-03608, Eastern District of New York.
Euclid runs Magic Eden. About two years ago it launched $ME and sold it as the official token: cross-chain use, governance, buybacks, airdrops, staking rewards. Some of that showed up. Then CEO Jack Lu announced the pivot to Dicey, a crypto casino and sportsbook. $ME got pulled back to Solana. Bitcoin and EVM uses shut down. NFT buybacks stopped. The proprietary wallet closed. Holders who had staked were locked in for the drop.
Plaintiff Jaime Pagan put in about $2,000 and sued under New York consumer law, plus negligent misrepresentation and unjust enrichment, on behalf of a class.
Federal court only because of the Class Action Fairness Act.
The problem is the wallet terms he agreed to -
“YOU AND EUCLID LABS AGREE THAT EACH MAY BRING DISPUTES AGAINST THE OTHER ONLY IN YOUR OR ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, AND NOT AS A PLAINTIFF OR CLASS MEMBER IN ANY PURPORTED CLASS.”
Cogan held the wallet is “a centerpiece of the complaint,” so the terms count even though they were not attached. No class claim, no CAFA, no subject-matter jurisdiction. He also refused to keep the individual claims against Euclid alive inside a class case against the executives. That, he wrote, would “end run the class action waiver.”
Co-founder Zhuoxun Yin is out too, on personal jurisdiction. A 2022 pizza video and a 2024 yacht party in New York do not do it. The statements actually tied to him were true, and a true statement is not a misrepresentation.
This is a pleadings dismissal, not a finding that the pivot was fine.
Other defendants, including Lu, are still in the caption. Euclid and Yin are not.
Monocular retweeted
THE PRESIDENT OF BITWISE JUST SAID HE WILL "LOOK INTO" A $DOG ETF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Monocular retweeted
Two years ago, @_amanda_fab covered Bitcoin #Runes via @Bloomberg.
Since then, #Runes have accounted for an estimated 60–70% of all Bitcoin transaction fees, 80% during peak periods. solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u, the flagship Rune, is now listed on @KrakenFX, helping usher in a new wave of Bitcoiners. 🟧
Monocular retweeted
THE $DOG ARMY IS MAKING THE STRONGEST STAND AGAINST INSIDER CORRUPTION CRYPTO HAS EVER SEEN
ANY CEX/KOL/VC WHO WE CATCH EXPLOITING RETAIL, ABUSING THEIR INFLUENCE, OR RIGGING THE MARKET WILL BE EXPOSED, CALLED OUT, AND HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR ACTIONS
Monocular retweeted
Runes are accounting for 70% of Bitcoin transactions
Runes…..
On the #1 chain in the world.
solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u is unstoppable.
Do not miss solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u
Monocular retweeted
I have good news to share
Bitget and @GracyBitget have seen the $DOG Army's posts and have agreed to indefinitely delay the delisting of $DOG
I am confident that the $DOG Army will be able to demonstrate why $DOG deserves to remain listed on Bitget permanently given that it is one of the largest and most active communities in crypto
On behalf of the $DOG Army we wish Bitget the best of luck recovering the stolen funds and resuming withdrawals for all coins very soon including $DOG
Dear @GracyBitget,
I would like to bring to your attention a serious incident that occurred on Bitget yesterday as a second-order effect of the hack.
Despite the exploit occurring only hours earlier, with withdrawals still frozen, Bitget made a delisting announcement for $DOG.
The combination of the $DOG delisting announcement, the inability for users to withdraw, and broader trust concerns following the hack resulted in a significant price dislocation event for $DOG on Bitget.
Making a delisting announcement while withdrawals are paused, particularly just hours after a major exploit and during a period of heightened market uncertainty, is highly abnormal for an exchange.
This is the type of behavior one might expect from smaller, less reputable exchanges, but not from an established and respected exchange such as Bitget.
As a result, $DOG's price on Bitget has significantly decoupled from prices on other exchanges, directly impacting Bitget users who hold or trade $DOG.
Bitget has been a popular and trusted venue for trading $DOG for two and a half years, and it is disappointing to see longtime $DOG holders negatively affected in this way after being loyal to Bitget for so long.
Furthermore, $DOG is a major cryptocurrency project with one of the strongest and most active memecoin communities in all of crypto.
It is difficult to understand the decision to delist a $100M+ asset like $DOG, which has generated more than $1B in trading volume on Bitget, while the exchange continues to list hundreds of significantly smaller assets with communities that are only a small fraction of the size of the $DOG Army.
On behalf of the $DOG Army, I would therefore like to formally request that Bitget reconsider this decision and reinstate $DOG spot trading.
Doing so would help address the market dislocation created under these unusual circumstances and demonstrate Bitget's commitment to its longtime users.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. We also wish Bitget the best in recovering the stolen assets and resolving any other issues arising from the hack.
Sincerely,
$DOG Army
Monocular retweeted
Dear @GracyBitget, you said "every decision will be accounted for, transparently and in full."
The solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u (Bitcoin) delisting timeline doesn't add up.
⏱ Sep 24, 18:31 UTC: Bitget hacked for $350M+. Every withdrawal frozen.
⏱ Sep 25: hours later, DOG/USDT delisting notice. solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u deposits and Convert cut the same day.
⏱ Sep 28 to 30: BTC, ETH, USDT withdrawals reopen first.
⏱ Sep 30, 10:00 UTC: DOG/USDT spot delisted.
⏱ Oct 2, 08:00 UTC: solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u withdrawals finally reopen.
That's 46 hours where the pair is gone and holders still can't withdraw. Their only exit was Bitget's own order book, during a freeze, after a delisting announcement.
The notice says "periodic review." It never mentions the hack.
Why announce a delisting while users can't withdraw? And why make it take effect before solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u can leave the exchange? Are you planning to steal customer funds?
The fair fix: pause the delisting until solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u withdrawals have been open long enough for holders to choose where they trade or @Bitget halts delisting of solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u (Bitcoin) completely to support FREE & FAIR.
Timeline attached. 👇
Monocular retweeted
Bitget's delisting of $DOG has been one of the most unprofessional experiences I have encountered in my 12 years in crypto
First their listing team (really a sales team) harassed me on telegram trying to "shake down" the $DOG Army
Then they chose to announce the $DOG delisting just hours after a hacker exploited Bitget for $352M
Meanwhile withdrawals remain halted indefinitely and customers are panicking
This created a major price dislocation where $DOG on Bitget has been trading significantly below market price for two days now
Why was the Bitget team spending its energy delisting $DOG instead of focusing entirely on investigating such a serious security incident and ensuring customer funds were safe?
The way this was handled showed a serious disregard for Bitget users and caused significant harm to both the $DOG price and the $DOG holders who trusted Bitget
I sincerely hope that @GracyBitget takes accountability for this $DOG price decoupling incident and addresses it immediately by not moving forward with delisting $DOG on Wednesday
Dear @GracyBitget, you said "every decision will be accounted for, transparently and in full."
The solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u (Bitcoin) delisting timeline doesn't add up.
⏱ Sep 24, 18:31 UTC: Bitget hacked for $350M+. Every withdrawal frozen.
⏱ Sep 25: hours later, DOG/USDT delisting notice. solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u deposits and Convert cut the same day.
⏱ Sep 28 to 30: BTC, ETH, USDT withdrawals reopen first.
⏱ Sep 30, 10:00 UTC: DOG/USDT spot delisted.
⏱ Oct 2, 08:00 UTC: solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u withdrawals finally reopen.
That's 46 hours where the pair is gone and holders still can't withdraw. Their only exit was Bitget's own order book, during a freeze, after a delisting announcement.
The notice says "periodic review." It never mentions the hack.
Why announce a delisting while users can't withdraw? And why make it take effect before solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u can leave the exchange? Are you planning to steal customer funds?
The fair fix: pause the delisting until solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u withdrawals have been open long enough for holders to choose where they trade or @Bitget halts delisting of solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u (Bitcoin) completely to support FREE & FAIR.
Timeline attached. 👇
Monocular retweeted
Dear @GracyBitget,
I would like to bring to your attention a serious incident that occurred on Bitget yesterday as a second-order effect of the hack.
Despite the exploit occurring only hours earlier, with withdrawals still frozen, Bitget made a delisting announcement for $DOG.
The combination of the $DOG delisting announcement, the inability for users to withdraw, and broader trust concerns following the hack resulted in a significant price dislocation event for $DOG on Bitget.
Making a delisting announcement while withdrawals are paused, particularly just hours after a major exploit and during a period of heightened market uncertainty, is highly abnormal for an exchange.
This is the type of behavior one might expect from smaller, less reputable exchanges, but not from an established and respected exchange such as Bitget.
As a result, $DOG's price on Bitget has significantly decoupled from prices on other exchanges, directly impacting Bitget users who hold or trade $DOG.
Bitget has been a popular and trusted venue for trading $DOG for two and a half years, and it is disappointing to see longtime $DOG holders negatively affected in this way after being loyal to Bitget for so long.
Furthermore, $DOG is a major cryptocurrency project with one of the strongest and most active memecoin communities in all of crypto.
It is difficult to understand the decision to delist a $100M+ asset like $DOG, which has generated more than $1B in trading volume on Bitget, while the exchange continues to list hundreds of significantly smaller assets with communities that are only a small fraction of the size of the $DOG Army.
On behalf of the $DOG Army, I would therefore like to formally request that Bitget reconsider this decision and reinstate $DOG spot trading.
Doing so would help address the market dislocation created under these unusual circumstances and demonstrate Bitget's commitment to its longtime users.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. We also wish Bitget the best in recovering the stolen assets and resolving any other issues arising from the hack.
Sincerely,
$DOG Army
Monocular retweeted
Repost if you are ready for $DOG to violently smash through a billion dollar market cap
