프라이빗 컴퓨팅 - AI에게 말 못할 고민을 털어놓는다면? (feat. 0g) 혹시... >//< AI한테 물어보기 좀 께름칙하거나 민망한 질문을 해야 할 때가 있으셨나요? 그럴 때 내 대화를 아무도 못 보는 AI가 있다면 참 좋을 텐데 말이죠 👀👀👀 0G Private Computer는 일부 모델을 호출할 때 TEE(하드웨어 격리) + 종단 간 암호화 + 데이터 무보관을 결합한 프라이빗 모드를 지원합니다. 이 모드에서는 0G도, 모델 제공자도 내 대화 내용을 볼 수 없게 되는데, 이게 일반적인 시크릿 모드 같은 단순한 개념이 아니라, 실제로 하드웨어 증명을 통해 프라이버시가 지켜졌다는 것을 검증할 수 있게 된다는 점에서 큰 강점이 있어요. 꼭 민망한 질문이 아니더라도, 개인정보가 들어간 상담이나 유출되면 안 되는 대박 아이템 아이디에이션처럼 프라이버시가 중요한 순간에 좋은 대안이 될 수 있는 프라이버시 컴퓨팅 역시 앞으로 계속 주목받을 수밖에 없는 분야중 하나가 아닌가.

My Thoughts About zero-gravity:native and iAI iAI has bounced off the lows, but I still think its AI usage is being underpriced. Staking it gives you daily AI credits, which is a pretty practical reason to own it if you already spend money on AI. @AlgodTrading's criticism of Venice's equity<>token structure took some heat out of the trade. But my read is that the concerns around $DIEM have eased a little, and I don't see Venice's runway as an immediate worry right now. Using DIEM around $2,000 as a reference, I still think $400–$600 is a conservative value for the AI usage alone, even after setting aside the collateral a minter can recover. iAI looks more attractive to me on that basis. Its initial terms offer 1.271 AI credits per staked token per day, with a stated usage value above $1, versus DIEM's $1 a day. Looking at that daily allowance, I could make a case for valuing iAI's AI usage at 1.271x DIEM's. But Venice's $65m raise in July deserves some weight too. So even if I stay conservative and give iAI just a 1.05x multiple, that's $420–$630 for the AI usage alone. I still think that's good value against the roughly $367 quoted on Zia right now. Even before assigning any value to the minter's right to recover the underlying 0G collateral, returned as a0G, I still think iAI around that price could be close to a bottom on AI usage value alone. That recovery right stays with the minting wallet; buying iAI on the market gives you the compute rights. The usage value is where I still see a gap. Some people have also raised questions about how long 0G can keep funding the credits, but its recent commitment to invest S$20m in Singapore over five years makes me more comfortable on that front. To me, it suggests enough runway to absorb the ongoing credit costs and keep building the service. For people who use a lot of AI and will actually consume the credits, the entry looks attractive to me. Taking @0G_labs's recent activity in Singapore and at KBW into account, I think this is a reasonable bet if you size it around what you're prepared to lose and have a clear exit plan if it doesn't work out. I'm planning to use mine for language practice and writing on Brunch.