Ultra Jean retweeted
The past few days, I got my hands on thousands of new transcripts and hundreds of recordings, thanks to leads from @SKDoubleDub33 and @iamlisalogan .
You've heard that the DSA is proposing structural reforms to America, including abolishing the Senate and imposing term limits.
What you not have heard is - there is an operational plan to put it all into action. If the Democratic Party sweeps 2026, then DSA will become "foot soldiers" in constant clashes with the administration to cross a "red line" or invoke a "doomsday scenario" - meaning, President Trump invokes the Insurrection Act, probably sometime in 2027.
Then, a lot of coordinated responses kick off, including delegitimizing the federal government itself and handing that legitimacy to Democratic governors. 2028 then becomes a vote on whether to keep America governance as-is or to burn it all down to appease a "young and brown" demographic.
The mysterious group who's been coordinating 50501, Indivisible, and coordinating the NoKings protests is called "United Democracy Alliance" and their intellectual leader is Erica Chenoweth who came up with the 3.5% rule of nonviolent regime change.
Patience. I know I've hyped this more than anything else. It's genuinely the biggest discovery I've had. This is an enormous archive. This is only the beginning.
Ultra Jean retweeted
Take them seriously. Elissa Slotkin, John Brennan's protégé, was one of the Seditious Six trying to organise an insurrection. Now she threatens to prosecute anyone who works for Trump.
This is the colour revolution playbook, run by the same people, here in America. First they stir up unrest, then they call for an insurrection, then they use lawfare against anyone who stands with President Trump.
Sen. Elissa Slotkin says she wants the threat of prosecution to serve as a "deterrence message" that scares young people away from taking jobs in the Trump administration.
The Michigan Democrat made the remarks at a University of Chicago event, saying she wants prospective hires to think, "Lord, that might be buying myself a ton of problems that I don't want, and so let me avoid participating in that."
The comments drew sharp backlash from legal scholars and conservative students alike, with law professor Jonathan Turley saying Slotkin "said the quiet part out loud."
Full story here foxnews.com/politics/slotkin…
Ultra Jean retweeted
Translation:
@ElissaSlotkin is the fascist.
ON UCHICAGO CAMPUS: U.S. Senator from Michigan Elissa Slotkin hopes planned political prosecutions of republican leaders will scare young conservatives from getting involved in politics.
@ElissaSlotkin
Ultra Jean retweeted
Charlie Kirk was murdered for his beliefs and conservative values. Senator Slotkin wants that to be a message of deterrence for young people.
Tell me again who the fascists are...
ON UCHICAGO CAMPUS: U.S. Senator from Michigan Elissa Slotkin hopes planned political prosecutions of republican leaders will scare young conservatives from getting involved in politics.
@ElissaSlotkin
Ultra Jean retweeted
Dear Trump Voters:
If you stay home to "send a message," this is what Democrats will import into America.
Ultra Jean retweeted
Every time something happens in the Grand Conspiracy case in Florida, Obama jumps on the plane to fly to the UK. He rushed to London last year when the subpoenas were issued (video attached)
Now he is in the UK again just as Brennan is facing the Grand Jury.
Why?
Because Obama and Brennan ran CIA operations against President Trump and his aides from the UK, with help from British intelligence chiefs.
The CIA cannot operate against American citizens in the US, let alone against an opposing political campaign.
So Obama's friends in the UK helped him to target Donald Trump. Richard Dearlove, former head of British intelligence, Christopher Steele, who worked for Dearlove, Stefan Halper, Brennan's CIA operative based in the UK, numerous others.
CIA station chief in London was Gina Haspel, who later covered up all the evidence. She worked with Alan Kohler who became the head of FBI counterintelligence and raided President Trump's home, Mar-a-Lago to steal and hide Russiagate documents.
OBAMA MEETS UK PRIME MINISTER IN MANCHESTER
Manchester, UK, same day: Obama photographed leaving the Stock Exchange Hotel on 15 October.
The Manchester Evening News reports he met UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham in the hotel's Sterling Bar.
This was ahead of his Co-op Live show.
[Photo: Manchester Evening News]
Ultra Jean retweeted
Replying to @Tinybutfierce1
It took 580 years to build the Cathedral.
Islam can destroy it in hours.
THIS is what Democrats welcomed into America.
Ultra Jean retweeted
Wow… a sitting United States Senator walked into the University of Chicago and told a room full of students exactly what her side plans to do if they get the power back. Elissa Slotkin says she wants to look at "signature cases" and not just focus on the president "but on the people who enabled him," and then she said the rest out loud like she was reading a grocery list… she wants young people coming out of school to look at a job in the Trump administration and think "Lord, that might be buying myself a ton of problems that I don't want, and so let me avoid participating in that." Her words, "I want that deterrence message."
So let me make sure you heard it right. She is not talking about catching criminals, she is talking about making examples out of people so the next generation of conservatives is too scared to serve their own country. The target is not the man at the top, it is the young person fresh out of college who thought working for their country sounded like an opportunity.
Now keep in mind this is the same senator who refused to sit down with the DOJ back in February over her video telling troops they could refuse illegal orders, and who said on camera the Trump administration was using intimidation "to deter others from speaking out" and that "the intimidation is the point." Those were her words eight months ago. Today she wants a deterrence message aimed at kids coming out of school. So which is it, Senator? When they look at you it is intimidation, and when you do it to a young staffer it is policy?
I have lived on the receiving end of lawfare for years, and I can tell you the punishment is the process. They do not need to win the case, they need you to drain your savings, lose sleep, watch your family worry, and make sure everybody watching decides standing up is not worth it. That is the whole point and she just admitted it on a stage at the Institute of Politics like she was presenting a policy paper.
But hey… they are the party of norms, right? Think I am wrong? Watch the clip again and tell me what "deterrence" means to you.
This is what they will do with the gavel and the subpoena power if you hand it to them on November 3. Every young person who loves this country should hear this and do the exact opposite of what she wants… show up, serve, and refuse to be scared off.
@ElissaSlotkin, message received. We are not going anywhere.
But God.
ON UCHICAGO CAMPUS: U.S. Senator from Michigan Elissa Slotkin hopes planned political prosecutions of republican leaders will scare young conservatives from getting involved in politics.
@ElissaSlotkin
Ultra Jean retweeted
This is what they wanted for NYC in 2020’s Summer of Love and what they want now. We have entered an era of a genuine clash of civilizations. Ask yourself this: Do you really think Ilhan Omar or Zohran Mamdani is brokenhearted over seeing this?
Ultra Jean retweeted
Someone should ask Johns Hopkins. They had me perform brain surgery for decades.
Ultra Jean retweeted
So, the guy who got the most votes in the history of the Universe, in the "fairest" election in all the galaxy, can't scrape together enough support to build a stupid ass library?
Okay, sure... sounds totally legit 🤪
🚨 Biden’s presidential library may never be built due to lack of support.
Tax documents show the foundation holds just $4 million, mostly leftover campaign money, while it hopes to raise only $11.3 million.
By comparison, a Trump library is around $1 billion.
Democratic donors are refusing to give, with one saying “no real library will ever be built” and another stating he will not contribute because Biden’s legacy was tarnished.
So Mr. record 81 million votes cannot muster enough donations and support for an $11 million library.
Shocker.
Ultra Jean retweeted

TheLastRefuge@TheLastRefuge2Oct 14
United States
United StatesConnected via United States App StoreAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
Replying to @alexchristy17
Fusion @KDilanianMSNOW makes shit up all the time. This is not surprising.
Ultra Jean retweeted
Quite the story…
Dear Secretary Bessent @SecScottBessent,
My name is Everett Stern. In 2010 I was a compliance officer at @HSBC. From a back office in New Castle, Delaware, I watched billions of dollars move to drug cartels, sanctioned regimes, and terrorist organizations. The enemies of the United States. I documented it, I escalated it, and when the bank would not act, I took it to the @FBI, the @CIA, and eventually the @SECGov.
The result was a $1.92 billion settlement. At the time, it was one of the largest in American history. It was also about five weeks of the bank’s profit. Not one banker was charged. Not one went to prison.
I paid a different price. I lost my career, my savings, and my place in the industry I had trained for. I was blacklisted. Every door in American finance closed at once. I slept on a camping cot in a 300 square foot apartment because I could not afford a bed, and I waited tables at @PFChangs to eat. I tell you this not for sympathy, but so you understand that I know exactly what it costs to do the right thing in American finance, and exactly how little the system does in return.
I made that sacrifice because I believed it would change something.
Yesterday, your department fined @BankofAmerica $1.2 billion for failing to report more than $5 billion in suspicious transactions, some of it tied by your own findings to Chinese laundering networks, narcotics, and the southwest border, alongside 475 apparent sanctions violations touching Russia, Iran, and global terrorism. The bank admitted it willfully violated the Bank Secrecy Act.
Fourteen years after HSBC. A bank with “America” in its name. And once again, not one individual charged.
Secretary Bessent, I want to say plainly what I believe you already know. The fines are not working.
A fine is paid by shareholders, absorbed by the balance sheet, and forgotten by the next earnings call. Bank of America reported earnings this morning. Nobody who set the alert thresholds, nobody who decided the 2024 cease and desist could wait, nobody who chose the backlog over the law will lose a single thing they value. Their lives are untouched. That is the entire reason the behavior repeats.
This is money laundering. This is blood money. Money that reaches a cartel buys fentanyl that kills Americans. Money that reaches a terrorist organization buys the next attack. This country has fought a war on drugs and a war on terror for decades, at enormous cost in lives and treasure, and all the while we have allowed the financing to flow through institutions we charter and regulate. Cut off the money and we win. We have never seriously tried.
There is also a question of equal justice that I cannot let go.
Before I walked into the FBI building to report HSBC, I stopped in front of the Great Seal on the wall and read the words engraved beneath it: “Justice is the defense of our liberty.” I believed that. I still want to. But every day in this country, people go to prison for crimes that are nothing next to moving money for the people who want Americans dead. A suit, a title, and a corporate badge should not be a shield from the consequences that apply to everyone else. If a street dealer goes to prison for what he sells, the banker who moved the cartel’s money should be standing next to him.
I also want to raise something that is rarely said in these conversations. Why has no one inside Bank of America come forward the way I did? The answer is that everyone in American banking knows what happened to me, and to the whistleblowers who came after. The last person who spoke up is the only policy anyone believes. That is a culture problem, and it starts with leadership, in the banks and in the agencies that regulate them.
This is not a political issue. It has spanned administrations of both parties. It is a national security issue, and I am asking you to treat it as one.
Three things would change the math overnight.
Refer individuals for criminal prosecution. Not the analyst in the queue. The executives who set the thresholds and chose the risk. One banker in handcuffs would do more than every fine in Treasury’s history combined.
End “too big to jail.” An institution cannot be too big to fail and too big to jail at the same time. If it is the first, it must be held to a higher standard, not a lower one.
And if Bank of America will not act as America’s bank, review its charter. A national charter is a privilege granted on behalf of the American people. It should be conditioned on not moving money for the people trying to kill them.
Secretary Bessent, you said yesterday that these actions send a clear message that even the biggest institutions are not above the law. With respect, the institution was never the problem. The people inside it are above the law, and they know it. Until that changes, I will keep writing letters like this one, and the next bank will keep paying the next fine.
I gave up everything I had to stop this. I am asking you to use the power you have to finish it.
Respectfully,
Everett A. Stern
HSBC Whistleblower
Founder and Intelligence Director, Tactical Rabbit
Ultra Jean retweeted
It’s all a show, folks.
Josh Billinson@jbillinsonOct 13United States
United StatesConnected via United States App StoreAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
The world you grew up in no longer exists
Ultra Jean retweeted
🚨 Michigan’s SOS is publishing duplicate vote history records that should be IMPOSSIBLE.
Same voter ID + same election date appearing twice (or more) in the statewide files. One for the Aug 6, 2024 primary showed up again in the October 2026 data—two years after the election was certified.
These duplicates are NOT in the live QVF. They only appear in the published statewide exports. The SOS scrubbed nearly all of the 6,126 duplicates from the August 2024 primary, then one reappears years later.
No investigation. Just rewritten records. I will not publish the name of this individual. How would you like to be FALSELY identified in Michigan's voter rolls as voting 2X? Yet, this happens every month.
Where is the accountability? Why is the State of Michigan publishing altered vote history records that doesn’t match the actual QVF system?
Graphics + full details:
grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtMi1jb…
@AAGDhillon @AGToddBlanche @AsheinAmerica @AttyStefLambert @BarronTNews_ @bennyjohnson @CaraCastronuova @CraigDMauger @DaveBondyTV @DeluxePsypher @DNIGabbard @DonaldJTrumpJr @Downi75 @DrJohnEastman @EmeraldRobinson @GatewayPundit @HarmeetKDhillon @JackPosobiec @JimHoft_ @JSolomonReports @KevinKijewski @LaraLogan @MattGaetz @MattMorseTV @MichiganBraden @mifairelections @MINewsSource @MIOaklandClerk @MonicaYatooma @MrJustinBarclay @PatriotMarkCook @PattyLovesTruth @PjColbeck @RealAlexJones @realDonaldTrump @RealFreedomTalk @RealJoeHoft @RealLindellTV @realMikeLindell @SheriffLeaf @SidneyPowell1 @StephenM @stephiebeltinck @stevegrubershow @SusieWiles @Th_Midwesterner @tonyforlini1 @TruckerRandy @USAO_SDFL @VanessaBNews
Ultra Jean retweeted
Replying to @BillMelugin_
Wow. Muslim Brotherhood is the archetype of political Islam. His sister admitted that their family are filled with extremists associated with that movement and ideology.
Ultra Jean retweeted
Replying to @MadLiberals
@MadLiberals is a Big Brain Patriot. I love that he is credited here. I just hope and pray that some accountability occurs.
New: Analysis and more details of Fulgham v Ware County GA concerning double scanned ballots scanned for the second time 8 days after the 2020 election without the knowledge of the Ware Chairman of Elections.
"The Fulgham v. Ware County Board of Elections ruling demonstrates that a lawsuit can be a strategic success even if it is legally dismissed. While the court technically dismissed the case for lacking a formal theory of recovery—because civil courts exist to grant specific relief, not just provide answers—the litigation successfully forced transparency."
"By bringing the evidence to light, the lawsuit compelled the court to broker an immediate, informal courthouse meeting. This unusual step bypassed standard legal barriers, removed opposing counsel, and forced county officials to finally answer questions, leading to the crucial admission regarding unauthorized ballot scanning." (Google AI summary)
Our evidence and analysis was as solid as a rock, and I wouldn't do anything differently. We never accused Ware officials of scanning the ballots 8 days after the election. We suspected they did not do it. But in my opinion Ware officials were afraid of getting sued by Dominion, so they wouldn't provide an explanation without a lawsuit. I called their bluff and we eventually got what we wanted, which was to question them. Our pressure forced them to identify who did it, without us having to do so.
More details about the resolution meeting arranged by Judge Muldrew in a private room within the courthouse:
The judge arranged the meeting so that Ware's attorney was not in the room. This was to my advantage.
One of my questions:
Fulgham: "Mr. Bartlett (BOE Chairman), who scanned batch 35 on 11-11-2020 which was 8 days after the election? Was it the Dominion technician?"
Bartlett: "Yes. But we're just saying the technician did it."
Was he coached by attorneys to say "technician" without saying "Dominion technician"?
Either way, he first answered "yes".
Keep in mind that batch 35 was identified by @mad_liberals as being an exact copy of batch 11 that had been scanned and added to the cast vote record 8 days prior on election day. @mad_liberals (Phillip Davis) had already successfully identified several thousand double scanned ballots in Fulton alone, as concluded in State Election Board case 2023-025.
Bartlett went on to explain what he had been directed to explain, because remember, Bartlett originally stated (evidence provided in court filings) that he had no knowledge of ballots being scanned on November 11. He then said it was done to correct an error. But there's no excuse to double scan ballots and leave them on the cvr.
I asked Nelson (Supervisor of Elections) why he told the media in 2020 that 100 ballots were doubled scanned by his employee (not a Dominion technician) by accident. He told me he could not remember what he told the media.
And according to Davis, there is also another double scanned batch on the cvr known as batch 1. Bartlett and Nelson had absolutely no answers for batch 1. All of this evidence was presented to the court and is available to the public.
By the way the two Ware double scanned batches both favored Biden. Around 70% of these double scanned ballots went to Biden in a county that went around 70% to Trump.
In conclusion, the Georgia legislative branch should act on this evidence (along with evidence presented by @MonclaKevin and Joe Rossi in SEB cases 2021-181 and 2023-025) to regain sovereign control of our election system and secure our elections. In fact, Judge Muldrew suggested to me in the courtroom that the legislative branch could be made aware of the evidence.
Fulgham v Ware was about We the People exercising our right to question government officials who work for us. It was about transparency. And it was about the counties having operational and sovereign control of our elections.
In 2020 a Deep State corporation, along with shady non profit organizations, were running our elections behind closed doors. We can never allow this to happen again.
Always vote and always defend the integrity of our elections.
God bless America. 🇺🇸
Ultra Jean retweeted
New: Analysis and more details of Fulgham v Ware County GA concerning double scanned ballots scanned for the second time 8 days after the 2020 election without the knowledge of the Ware Chairman of Elections.
"The Fulgham v. Ware County Board of Elections ruling demonstrates that a lawsuit can be a strategic success even if it is legally dismissed. While the court technically dismissed the case for lacking a formal theory of recovery—because civil courts exist to grant specific relief, not just provide answers—the litigation successfully forced transparency."
"By bringing the evidence to light, the lawsuit compelled the court to broker an immediate, informal courthouse meeting. This unusual step bypassed standard legal barriers, removed opposing counsel, and forced county officials to finally answer questions, leading to the crucial admission regarding unauthorized ballot scanning." (Google AI summary)
Our evidence and analysis was as solid as a rock, and I wouldn't do anything differently. We never accused Ware officials of scanning the ballots 8 days after the election. We suspected they did not do it. But in my opinion Ware officials were afraid of getting sued by Dominion, so they wouldn't provide an explanation without a lawsuit. I called their bluff and we eventually got what we wanted, which was to question them. Our pressure forced them to identify who did it, without us having to do so.
More details about the resolution meeting arranged by Judge Muldrew in a private room within the courthouse:
The judge arranged the meeting so that Ware's attorney was not in the room. This was to my advantage.
One of my questions:
Fulgham: "Mr. Bartlett (BOE Chairman), who scanned batch 35 on 11-11-2020 which was 8 days after the election? Was it the Dominion technician?"
Bartlett: "Yes. But we're just saying the technician did it."
Was he coached by attorneys to say "technician" without saying "Dominion technician"?
Either way, he first answered "yes".
Keep in mind that batch 35 was identified by @mad_liberals as being an exact copy of batch 11 that had been scanned and added to the cast vote record 8 days prior on election day. @mad_liberals (Phillip Davis) had already successfully identified several thousand double scanned ballots in Fulton alone, as concluded in State Election Board case 2023-025.
Bartlett went on to explain what he had been directed to explain, because remember, Bartlett originally stated (evidence provided in court filings) that he had no knowledge of ballots being scanned on November 11. He then said it was done to correct an error. But there's no excuse to double scan ballots and leave them on the cvr.
I asked Nelson (Supervisor of Elections) why he told the media in 2020 that 100 ballots were doubled scanned by his employee (not a Dominion technician) by accident. He told me he could not remember what he told the media.
And according to Davis, there is also another double scanned batch on the cvr known as batch 1. Bartlett and Nelson had absolutely no answers for batch 1. All of this evidence was presented to the court and is available to the public.
By the way the two Ware double scanned batches both favored Biden. Around 70% of these double scanned ballots went to Biden in a county that went around 70% to Trump.
In conclusion, the Georgia legislative branch should act on this evidence (along with evidence presented by @MonclaKevin and Joe Rossi in SEB cases 2021-181 and 2023-025) to regain sovereign control of our election system and secure our elections. In fact, Judge Muldrew suggested to me in the courtroom that the legislative branch could be made aware of the evidence.
Fulgham v Ware was about We the People exercising our right to question government officials who work for us. It was about transparency. And it was about the counties having operational and sovereign control of our elections.
In 2020 a Deep State corporation, along with shady non profit organizations, were running our elections behind closed doors. We can never allow this to happen again.
Always vote and always defend the integrity of our elections.
God bless America. 🇺🇸











































