𝓡𝓪𝓳𝓪𝓷 𝓜𝓮𝓱𝓻𝓸𝓽𝓻𝓪 🇮🇳

Rahul Gandhi seems to have developed a very predictable relationship with Indian business. First Ambani. Then Adani. Now Tata. Different company. Same conclusion: somehow every large corporate dispute eventually leads back to Modi and Shah. Now he says Tata is being “criminally destroyed” and Indian business is being treated like a political plaything. But there is a basic problem here. A boardroom dispute is not automatically a crime. A shareholder disagreement is not automatically state interference. A contested corporate decision does not become criminal merely because you add the word “criminal” to it. The Tata issue already has enough real questions: governance, board independence, shareholder rights, listing and control. Those deserve scrutiny. But if every commercial dispute is forced into the same political template, analysis becomes conspiracy by habit. At some point, one has to stop seeing the same ghost in every boardroom. India needs politicians who understand business before diagnosing it.