Pinned Tweet
If you need me, Iโll be over here smelling these flowers ๐ ๐
Hereโs to Rwandaโs mark in the building of international consensus on effective approaches to information and computer security ๐๐ฝ๐ท๐ผ
Almost 3yrs now with contributions to 4 different computer/information security projects of the International Atomic Energy Agency.
Being invited to contribute as an expert under Rwandaโs flag &on top notch teams is the biggest compliment of my career๐๐ฝ๐๐ฝ
๐บ๐ธ ๐ฌ๐ง ๐จ๐ฆ ๐ฆ๐บ ๐ท๐ผ ๐ธ๐ฎ ๐ณ๐ฑ ๐ฐ๐ท
๐ฉ๐ฝโ๐ป retweeted
Dore Umunsi Ucyeye ๐ณ๐ซ๐ถ๐ง
#VisitRwanda ๐ท๐ผ
๐ฉ๐ฝโ๐ป retweeted
Perhaps the only good metric for software quality is how eager the devs are to discuss their code and hear feedback
Replying to @crisisofconsc
@crisisofconsc Are you in Amsterdam right now? Look... I know Teams suck so I support you. Let me know if you'd like an alibi. We were hanging out all day together, right????
๐ฉ๐ฝโ๐ป retweeted
big news for people who do security by saying โcontinueโ
Some of the biggest openings in security have nothing to do with patching
How breaches began, per a 2026 report:
- 31% exploited a vulnerability
- 35% used phishing, stolen logins or impersonation scams
And nearly half now involve a vendor or partner, up 3x since 2024
Full piece from a16z's Asaf Ezra and Steph Zhang on six cybersecurity companies worth building: a16z.news/p/defense-in-depthโฆ
๐ฉ๐ฝโ๐ป retweeted
It's giving "I did my own research" facebook post vibes your grandma would make during march 2020
๐ฉ๐ฝโ๐ป retweeted
Someone needs to stop the VCs from talking about security ASAP it's getting so bad...
๐ฉ๐ฝโ๐ป retweeted
My internet connected fridge with default credentials and a private key of 4 was hacked by DPRK using abliterated GLM to craft extra clickable job offer phishing emails.
I fear we may lose public key cryptography :(
๐ฉ๐ฝโ๐ป retweeted
I would *love* to sit down with everyone who came up with this report.
I was the independent person responsible to do patch analysis for very large companies and facilities for many years. By that I mean I was at one point the single person responsible for pulling the $12+ million dollar switch for several Forbes 100 companies. Matter of fact that's how most of my old school followers know me, I used to dump the work in real time here on Twitter to get more customers (it worked).
So what does that mean?
Patch Tuesday is a great example, it used to drop 10AM PST Tuesday.
I would have an approx 50 page report Friday EoB to customers covering EVERY patch, ease of exploitation, profile the discovery team or person behind it, use in the wild, IoCs, weaponization likelihood in the next 24h, 72h, 7 days, 14 days, 30 days. No AI. Just IDA, DarunGrim, BinDiff, some tools I wrote and a dream. I would be in the office, Tuesday leave Friday, yes, that's correct, no home, straight working. I performed this service from 3 different companies to various customers. Sometimes it was with a select team, most of my career it was solo.
So what was the $12m switch? Well that was the cost it would be for just one of my customers to push out an emergency patch that wasn't in their already accepted patching procedures. That cost was electricity costs, server down time, service availability impact, employee costs, testing etc.
I was the person that said: this patch needs to be pushed and that break glass needs to happen due to impact being greater than X million in a 72h period.
I made that specific call maybe 11 times, in the 14 years that I did this service and I got that call twice.
The last time I got the call wrong was one of the TCP.sys icmp vulns, ping of death style. I failed to account that another vendors vulnerability would come out to put it to shame and be far more easier to exploit with a PoC.
The other time I got it wrong was exploitation happened about 96h instead of 72h.
The science to get this precision is hard, I got lucky a few times. What I will say is the goal of the attackers, what is at risk, and level of sophistication that attackers will use completely vary from target to target. Also there's a ton of this exploitation data is simply not visible, a lot of this data isn't public and requires lots of embedded resources, sources, and detailed tracking.
In almost all cases and scenarios during those 14 years: 0days are not kings, it's your trash exploits (auth bypass, file upload, hash leaks etc) that are 2 to 6 years old that got forgotten, unpatched, suddenly exposed to the Internet, or bridged over by a contractor that lead to massive incidents over and over.
For two decades, writing the exploit was the bottleneck in a cyberattack. AI made that step cheap, and patching hasn't gotten faster:
- On average, attacks went from landing 63 days after disclosure in 2018-19 to 7 days before it in 2025
- A working exploit went from a skilled person's month to a few hours of machine time
- The median time to fully fix a known-exploited bug rose to 43 days
a16z's @asaf_ez and @steph_zhang expect a long, expensive worm era, hitting hardest where systems can't update fast: hospitals, schools, small water systems.
"When attacking is nearly free, attackers no longer need to want a target."
Full piece from Asaf Ezra and Steph Zhang: a16z.news/p/the-exploit-was-โฆ
๐ฉ๐ฝโ๐ป retweeted
Replying to @IceSolst
It took my brain like 2 minutes to process this tweet well done
๐ฉ๐ฝโ๐ป retweeted
Replying to @GrahamHelton3
When the when the hacker are vulnerabilities and the AI exploits are have been cybersecurity or what patching did as far as machine speed
๐ฉ๐ฝโ๐ป retweeted
VCs finding out what most tech youtubers find out early: Talking about CYBERSECURITY AND HACKERS gets more traction.
The best part, you can just say whatever you want with no repercussions. Smash that subscribe button
๐ฉ๐ฝโ๐ป retweeted
CEOs are getting their infosec news from VC newsletters, we are cooked itโs so over
๐ฉ๐ฝโ๐ป retweeted
A lot of cybersecurity problems are really organizational dysfunction problems hidden behind a layer of tech. No amount of AI tokens can fix that.
Feel free to send this post to your boss.
๐ฉ๐ฝโ๐ป retweeted
Losing battle imo: no software system is hermetically sealed.
You can keep burning $ finding vulnerabilities, you will never find them all, youโll never test every combination of variables & deployment nuances & stacks.
The only worthwhile investment is in how we design & ship
Our security researchers built an autonomous cyber vulnerability discovery, exploitation, and patching pipeline.
In a single run with an upcoming cyber model, it validated and generated patches for 948 local privilege escalation vulnerabilities in the Linux kernel at a total API cost of $1.2 million.
๐ฉ๐ฝโ๐ป retweeted
Forty-eight replies and the only correct answer was two characters and an increment operator.
I have been a civil servant for almost 9yrs now and the cybersecurity portfolio I got to build over this time, I did not have in my wildest dreams and itโs all thanks to Rwanda Gov just letting me do things ๐
Find employers that will invest in you๐๐ฝ
Iโm eternally grateful๐๐ฝ๐ท๐ผ






























