French journalist Paul Amar: “They came prepared. They had the addresses of town halls. They had addresses of Jewish shop owners. In a street in Marseille, all businesses owned by Jews were set on fire. Businesses run by Muslims weren’t”

CNN: Jewish support for Democrats in New York has collapsed NY Generic Ballot Among Jews 2018: 🔵 Dem +40 2022: 🔵 Dem +49 2026: 🔵 Dem +13

Dear Secretary Bessent @SecScottBessent, My name is Everett Stern. In 2010 I was a compliance officer at @HSBC. From a back office in New Castle, Delaware, I watched billions of dollars move to drug cartels, sanctioned regimes, and terrorist organizations. The enemies of the United States. I documented it, I escalated it, and when the bank would not act, I took it to the @FBI, the @CIA, and eventually the @SECGov. The result was a $1.92 billion settlement. At the time, it was one of the largest in American history. It was also about five weeks of the bank’s profit. Not one banker was charged. Not one went to prison. I paid a different price. I lost my career, my savings, and my place in the industry I had trained for. I was blacklisted. Every door in American finance closed at once. I slept on a camping cot in a 300 square foot apartment because I could not afford a bed, and I waited tables at @PFChangs to eat. I tell you this not for sympathy, but so you understand that I know exactly what it costs to do the right thing in American finance, and exactly how little the system does in return. I made that sacrifice because I believed it would change something. Yesterday, your department fined @BankofAmerica $1.2 billion for failing to report more than $5 billion in suspicious transactions, some of it tied by your own findings to Chinese laundering networks, narcotics, and the southwest border, alongside 475 apparent sanctions violations touching Russia, Iran, and global terrorism. The bank admitted it willfully violated the Bank Secrecy Act. Fourteen years after HSBC. A bank with “America” in its name. And once again, not one individual charged. Secretary Bessent, I want to say plainly what I believe you already know. The fines are not working. A fine is paid by shareholders, absorbed by the balance sheet, and forgotten by the next earnings call. Bank of America reported earnings this morning. Nobody who set the alert thresholds, nobody who decided the 2024 cease and desist could wait, nobody who chose the backlog over the law will lose a single thing they value. Their lives are untouched. That is the entire reason the behavior repeats. This is money laundering. This is blood money. Money that reaches a cartel buys fentanyl that kills Americans. Money that reaches a terrorist organization buys the next attack. This country has fought a war on drugs and a war on terror for decades, at enormous cost in lives and treasure, and all the while we have allowed the financing to flow through institutions we charter and regulate. Cut off the money and we win. We have never seriously tried. There is also a question of equal justice that I cannot let go. Before I walked into the FBI building to report HSBC, I stopped in front of the Great Seal on the wall and read the words engraved beneath it: “Justice is the defense of our liberty.” I believed that. I still want to. But every day in this country, people go to prison for crimes that are nothing next to moving money for the people who want Americans dead. A suit, a title, and a corporate badge should not be a shield from the consequences that apply to everyone else. If a street dealer goes to prison for what he sells, the banker who moved the cartel’s money should be standing next to him. I also want to raise something that is rarely said in these conversations. Why has no one inside Bank of America come forward the way I did? The answer is that everyone in American banking knows what happened to me, and to the whistleblowers who came after. The last person who spoke up is the only policy anyone believes. That is a culture problem, and it starts with leadership, in the banks and in the agencies that regulate them. This is not a political issue. It has spanned administrations of both parties. It is a national security issue, and I am asking you to treat it as one. Three things would change the math overnight. Refer individuals for criminal prosecution. Not the analyst in the queue. The executives who set the thresholds and chose the risk. One banker in handcuffs would do more than every fine in Treasury’s history combined. End “too big to jail.” An institution cannot be too big to fail and too big to jail at the same time. If it is the first, it must be held to a higher standard, not a lower one. And if Bank of America will not act as America’s bank, review its charter. A national charter is a privilege granted on behalf of the American people. It should be conditioned on not moving money for the people trying to kill them. Secretary Bessent, you said yesterday that these actions send a clear message that even the biggest institutions are not above the law. With respect, the institution was never the problem. The people inside it are above the law, and they know it. Until that changes, I will keep writing letters like this one, and the next bank will keep paying the next fine. I gave up everything I had to stop this. I am asking you to use the power you have to finish it. Respectfully, Everett A. Stern HSBC Whistleblower Founder and Intelligence Director, Tactical Rabbit

What would happen if the events of October 7th took place in the United States? Picture the scenario: some 6,000 Mexican cartel operatives cross the U.S.-Mexico border. They raid Texas, Arizona, New Mexico, and California—traveling in pickup trucks, on motorcycles, and using paragliders—armed with advanced, lethal weaponry including RPGs, machine guns, Kalashnikovs, grenades, and more. They block major roads and intersections, gunning down any American who approaches. They storm border towns like El Paso and Nogales, as well as major cities like San Antonio, Phoenix, and San Diego; going house to house and neighborhood to neighborhood, they slaughter every American they encounter and burn their bodies in broad daylight. They storm a music festival—perhaps even Burning Man—and murder, in cold blood, thousands of young people who had come to celebrate, dance, and have a good time. They hurl grenades into shelters and tents, brutally rape women, and shoot them in their genitals. They abduct thousands of American citizens, dragging them into terror tunnels located within Mexican territory. They film all of this gleefully, uploading countless horrific videos of torture, violence, chaos, destruction, and mass death to their media channels—all while thousands of Mexicans cheer, rejoice, and celebrate the massacre. Now, let’s assume a scenario where the cartels are holding Mexican citizens hostage within a small area in the north of the country, refusing to let them hide in tunnels or escape to safety. Tell me: if such a scenario were to actually unfold, how would the United States of America respond? Would the U.S. response result in more or fewer than 75,000 Mexican civilian deaths? Would the U.S. military drop leaflets, make phone calls, and conduct precision strikes to avoid harming innocent civilians in Mexico? Would the United States be accused of genocide, ethnic cleansing, democide, or war crimes within the very first month of its response—while American hostages were still being held in the cartels' tunnels? To those who are skeptical or raising an eyebrow, let me tell you exactly how the United States would likely respond: The United States would declare total war on Mexico on day one. It would have brought the full weight of the U.S. military—Army, Air Force, Marine Corps, and Navy—to bear in a multi-dimensional invasion of Mexico. It would have deployed all the most advanced, sophisticated, and destructive weaponry developed in its laboratories and military production lines over the course of decades. It would have wreaked havoc and destruction on a scale unseen since Germany in 1945, showing no mercy. It would have seized territory after territory, city after city, mountain after mountain, without pause. It would have applied overwhelming military pressure. It would have demanded the cartels' unconditional surrender and the return of all American hostages, refusing to even consider negotiating with the cartels. And the Mexican government that enabled the massacre? The United States would have completely disregarded it. And what of the American public and the international community? Aside from the progressives within the U.S. administration, you wouldn't have heard a whisper of protest from American citizens. The American public—by an overwhelming majority—would have rallied around the flag in full support of the operation in Mexico. Even the U.S. media would have largely fallen into line—at least for the first few months. The UN, human rights organizations, and the ICC might have voiced criticism or protest. But they wouldn't have dared issue arrest warrants against the President of the United States or the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. They would have sat quietly and kept their mouths shut, fearing they might end up like Maduro. And how would that story have ended?

A Statement of Conscience on October 7 I will not start by saying ‘as a Muslim’ or ‘as an imam’, but as a human being. On October 7, over 1,200 innocent people were killed in a single day. Families were shot in their homes. Young people out dancing were hunted across open fields. Over 250 people, including children and the elderly, were dragged into Gaza as hostages. I think of a mother hiding in a safe room with her baby’s mouth covered. I think of a father listening as the line went quiet. I think of families who waited month after month for someone to come home, only to receive a coffin. I didn’t need my faith to recognize the evil of what happened. My heart told me first. But I’m a Muslim and an imam, and I owe the world one honest sentence: what was done that day was a crime against God. God teaches that whoever kills one innocent soul, it is as if he had killed all humanity. This day has an author: Yahya Sinwar. He planned it, ordered it, and knew what would follow. Every death of that day and war he started rests on him and Hamas leaders who sat in tunnels and foreign hotels and called slaughter a victory. It rests on every Palestinian leader who cheered, excused, handed out sweets, or said nothing. They chose this. They own it. But Sinwar did not invent himself. He was the fruit of a tree planted almost a century ago by the Muslim Brotherhood. Hamas named itself in its founding charter as the Brotherhood’s branch in Palestine. The Brotherhood’s poison is slow. It arrives through study circles, youth camps, charity boxes, and kind words to lonely young men. Drop by drop, it teaches him that his religion is a political party, his neighbour is his enemy, the Jew is the cause of his sorrow, and God is pleased by rage. By the time the gun arrives, the soul is already taken. I have seen this poison in mosques where sermons became rallies and young men could recite slogans but not sit still for a verse on mercy. Every people that let the Brotherhood in has paid in blood and ruined generations. It has never built anything it did not first set on fire. Behind Hamas stands another hand: the IRGC. It was the IRGC’s money, weapons, and training that turned a hateful idea into an army. One calls itself Sunni and the other Shia, and they may curse each other’s creeds, but they are united in what they worship. It is not God. It is power. The same IRGC that armed the killers of October 7 shoots Iranian girls for showing their hair, hangs young men for asking to be free, and has left graves from Tehran to Damascus to Beirut. They speak in God’s name. So did Pharaoh speak in the name of heaven. So let me say this clearly. Hamas and the IRGC are not merely enemies of Islam. That would be too small a charge, as if their crime were only against us. They are enemies of God. God is the Giver of life, yet they deal in death. God calls Himself the Most Merciful, yet they have made cruelty a sacrament. God honoured the children of Adam, yet they look at a child and see a target or a shield. To murder what God created and sign His name to it is the oldest blasphemy. And we Muslims have been too quiet. Some of us were afraid. Some told ourselves it was not our business. Some, God forgive them, felt something other than horror that morning and never confessed it. Silence was the soil this poison grew in. I will not add to it. So on this anniversary, let us say plainly what our scripture already says. The Jews are not our enemies. They are our cousins in Abraham, and their dead were created by the same God who created us. Today belongs to them: the murdered, the hostages, and families who still set a place at the table. To them I say: I am sorry for what was done to you by men who used the words of my prayers. You’re not alone in your grief or remembrance. The enemies of God are those who murder in His name. We know their names. It is time we said them from our own pulpits, in our own voices, before they speak for us again. Imam Tawhidi

BREAKING: ISLAMOPHOBIC AIRLINE PASSENGERS INTERFERE WITH ISLAMIC PILOT CARRYING OUT HIS SINCERELY HELD RELIGIOUS BELIEFS.