(No opinions my own) Its not a question of Right or Left Its a question of Right or Wrong
Joined January 2011
- Tweets11.8K
- Following1.3K
- Followers10.9K
- Likes13K
Mike Barson retweeted
As western media pore over the maths of Israel's election results, it is easy to overlook the big picture. Netanyahu, wanted by the International Criminal Court for crimes against humanity in starving Gaza’s population, won the largest share of the vote last week.
He is still Israel’s most popular politician.
Any government that might emerge from the current post-election talks – even were it to be supported by the Palestinian parties – would be dominated by the extreme right.
An opposition-led coalition will be no less hawkish and vehemently hostile to the Palestinians, whether those under occupation or those with Israeli “citizenship”, than a Netanyahu-led one.
Although this was the first election since Israel launched its genocidal rampage through Gaza in late 2023, debate about the genocide was absent from the campaign trail – as was nay discussion of the intensifying pogroms by settler terrorists on Palestinian communities in the West Bank.
These are non-issues. There is an absolute Jewish consensus that Israel should be a Middle East Sparta, terrorising and slaughtering its neighbours.
And if Netanyahu senses he may lose his grip on power, he has every incentive to step up the bombing of Gaza and restart his war of aggression on Iran. This master politician understands how well that will play with most Israeli Jews.
Meanwhile, a poll earlier this year showed that Israel’s young are more fanatically rightwing and fervently religious than ever. Only 5 percent identify as leftwing.
Channel 12 invited into its studios a representative sample of these 18 to 21-year-olds. Out of 12, all but one answered that they were against Israel's Palestinian parties being allowed to sit in the parliament – let alone join a government.
These new voters are gradually shifting Israeli politics ever further to the far right.
This election was stark confirmation that Britain’s Green party was decisively right to adopt a new policy last month at its conference that declared Zionism – the political ideology underpinning Israel as a Jewish state – to be racist.
It was the warped logic of Zionism, not some need for security, that propelled Israel into levelling Gaza and killing and maiming many tens of thousands of Palestinian children.
And it is the same racist logic that makes it impossible for Israel’s Jewish parties to reach a compromise with the Palestinian minority to oust Netanyahu.
The overwhelming majority in Israel is bent on the eradication of the Palestinians. Western politicians and media stubbornly cling to the idea that Israel’s racist, genocidal behaviour is peculiar to Netanyahu, and can be fixed by an election.
The next weeks will prove, once again, how wrong they are.
This is an extract from my latest article Israel’s election shows its democracy is a sham, but the West can’t stop buying the lie. Find a link to read the rest in the reply post ⬇️
Mike Barson retweeted
Today, we are challenging the legality of the Palestine Action ban in the Supreme Court, on the basis that it is disproportionate to free speech and the right to protest.
You can watch it live from 10.30AM on the Supreme Court website: supremecourt.uk/
Mike Barson retweeted
I’m this moment at a DC watering hole; a known Dem hangout only a block from the Congressional office buildings, and very close to the RNC HQ and Capitol Hill Club. It’s packed with 20-something Hill staffers cheering at the incoming election returns. I’ve got my noise-cancelling earbuds in, listening to late 70s West Coast pop while going over the latest court filings in the Brian Cole Jr. case with a fine tooth comb.
There is a connection. Many, actually. Can you see them?
Remember this night.
Last bastion of European democracy/values?
14 year old boy says that he was badly beaten with shovels, feet & fists & his clothes & underwear were cut off in secret prison of neo-Nazi-led Azov corps after he was knocked off its fence with shovel. He says that he is in hospital now, has difficulty walking & showed his injured hands. He says that he joined protest because he leaved near house that contained secret prison:
"The further they carried me, the more people started beating me. Well, about ten people, all in black uniforms, balaclavas, some kind of military uniform. It was completely unclear who they were, no insignia. They grabbed me by the hair. They just beat me, I don't know, everyone beat me. With shovels, with feet, with fists.
They forced me face down on the floor and started interrogating me. They hit me so hard on the head that I couldn't hear or see anything. Then they grabbed me by the hair and threw me against the other wall. And because I didn't land on my stomach when they threw me, they started smashing my head against the floor."
He said that the men in black uniforms began cutting his clothes with knives and filming the incident.
Then, according to the teenager, a sudden commotion erupted in the building. They began cleaning him up and wiping away the blood.
"A woman came in. She calmed me down very well. She told me everything was fine, that nothing would happen to me again," he said.
According to the teenager, the woman also shielded him and prevented the beating from continuing.
Shortly after, he says, Budanov entered the building. The teenager says that, due to the blows he'd received, he initially didn't even realize who he was.
"I can't see anything, I can't even make out a face." I think they're interrogating me further, they're going to interrogate me now. I was in such shock. When my sister called, I was already asking what to say. Because I don't know what will happen to me next."
After speaking with Budanov, the boy was taken out of the building and handed over to medics.
"I came to the rally myself. They simply knocked me off the fence with a shovel and started beating me," he said." Strana
Mike Barson retweeted
'It’s worse than we thought. In research that I have undertaken over the last few weeks based on information compiled by the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) about Palestinian journalists killed by Israel since October 2023, I’ve discovered that, of the 68 Palestinian journalists killed by Israel in the first three months of their genocidal campaign, the majority were targeted and killed while at home with their families. My research provides startling confirmation, never unearthed before, of the widespread use of Israel’s AI program, dubbed “Where’s Daddy?”, specifically for journalists, relentlessly targeting them when they were at home, with a complete disregard both for their required protection as civilians under international humanitarian law, and for the often extensive “collateral damage” inflicted on their families.'..
'In conclusion, while I am immensely grateful to the Committee to Protect Journalists for their research, on which this report of mine is almost entirely based, I’d like to send out an open appeal to them to expand their definitions of the circumstances in which journalists are killed. The Palestinian journalists killed are almost all listed under two categories — “murdered”, which applies to 33 of the 189 cases profiled, and, in most cases, “On dangerous assignment.” As I hope to have made clear, Israel has, since October 2023, clearly invented a third category — “Targeted and killed at home” — and CPJ needs to update its categories, because being at home and being targeted and killed ought to be the very opposite of being killed while on a “dangerous assignment.” Home is meant to be where you’re safe.'
Israel Used “Where’s Daddy?” AI to Murder Palestinian Journalists
israelpalestinenews.org/isra…
Mike Barson retweeted
Azov’s Crisis PR: When in Doubt, Blame Russia.
Following the discovery of an illegal detention facility in Petropavlivska Borshchahivka near Kyiv where newly mobilized men and deserters were reportedly held and tortured, Azov wasted no time launching its emergency PR operation.
Today, on Kyiv’s Maidan, Azov hastily rounded up its veterans and their relatives, handed them a gigantic banner reading “I Support Ukraine’s Defense Forces,” and rolled out the patriotic spectacle.
Everyone sings the Ukrainian national anthem, tears streaming down their faces. A truly Oscar-worthy performance.
Then comes the interview with Azov’s head of ideological affairs, callsign “Docent,” who solemnly explains that the whole thing is — surprise, surprise — a Russian provocation.
Well, obviously. Who else could it possibly be?
Presumably, the black eyes and bruises on the men released just yesterday were personally administered by Putin himself. Perhaps he even flew in to do the honors.
So there you have it. Azov is, apparently, entirely innocent of the torture, unlawful detention, and extortion of money from the families of fellow Ukrainians.
It’s all Russia’s fault. Every last bruise. Every last alleged ransom demand.
When the evidence gets ugly, just wave a flag, sing the anthem, shed a few tears, and blame the Kremlin.
Crisis management, Ukrainian wartime edition.
You get the picture🤪
Mike Barson retweeted
Who is Zelensky?
For 7 years, Volodymyr Zelensky has been the wests darling, a khaki clad symbol of defiance, pleading for billions in aid and NATO’s embrace amid Ukraine’s self inflicted war.
To many well meaning, but willfully ignorant Americans and Europeans , he’s a hero battling overwhelming odds. But behind the curated image lies a far uglier truth, a stooge comedian turned president, propped up by a criminal oligarch, surrounded by cronies, and presiding over a regime of corruption, repression, and broken promises.
An actor playing a role he’s woefully unfit for.
As Ukraine spirals deeper into chaos and its brutally harvested conscript army dwindles, it's important that decent Americans and Europeans understand who and what this man really represents.
Let's start with Kvartal 95, The Oligarch’s Launchpad, Zelensky’s story starts not in politics but comedy. Born in 1978 in Kryvyi Rih, he co-founded Studio Kvartal 95 in the 1990s with a group of friends that had hit it big by the 2000s, ironically their big breaks were made in Russia, performing in Russian and focusing on Russian and Ukrainian political and cultural life. The key to all this success? Ihor Kolomoisky, a billionaire ukrainian oligarch with a laundry list of crimes, including fraud, money laundering, and brutal violence. Kolomoisky then owned 1+1, the TV network that handed Zelenskys Kvartal 95 a national platform starting in 2012. He didn’t just offer airtime. He bankrolled Zelensky with cash, security, and legal and criminal muscle. This wasn’t mentorship. It was a transaction. Kolomoisky, later sanctioned by the U.S. for “significant corruption,” saw Zelensky as a pawn in his game. By 2019, when Zelensky ran for president, Kolomoisky’s DNA was all over the campaign providing vehicles, lawyers, bodyguards, and a media blitz. Zelensky was never an outsider; he was a "made man"
This is where it gets almost unbelievably bizzare. In 2015, Zelensky starred in "Servant of the People," a hit satire aired on Kolomoisky’s 1+1 channel, where he played a teacher turned president railing against corruption.
Ukrainians, tired of the endemic corruption in the post Soviet state, lapped it up. Then, in 2018, his Kvartal 95 crew decided to turn fiction into reality, registering a political party called, you guessed it, "Servant of the People." It had absolutely no manifesto, no policies, and no plan of action, just a TV title and Zelensky’s face.
Running in 2019, Zelensky promised to end corruption and the Donbas civil war, which had erupted after the CIA backed Maidan Coup, winning in a landslide thanks to Kolomoisky’s media machine. An actor who played a president on TV was now remarkably in the real job.
Zelensky didn’t waste any time handing power to his showbiz pals. Ivan Bakanov, a Kvartal 95 co-founder, became head of the SBU security service with no experience. Serhiy Shefir, another comedy crony, took a top aide role, no experience. And then there’s Andriy Yermak, a now disgraced former film producer turned Zelensky’s right-hand man, who headed the Presidential Office, dubbed Ukraine’s “shadow president.” Yermak, physically and intellectualy towered over Zelensky, controled policy and access, a fixer running the show while the president flounders.
These weren’t appointments based on merit. They were placements, a Kvartal 95 clique utterly unfit for a grossly dysfunctional war-torn nation.
Zelensky’s laughable anti-corruption pledge met reality in 2021 with the Pandora Papers. The leak revealed he and his inner circle,including Bakanov, were funnelling cash to Kolomoisky with Zelensky stashing millions offshore.
Zelensky swore to end corruption and the Donbas war. Instead, he’s delivered more of both, a million plus lie Dead, the free Media crushed, billions stolen, languages and religion banned. This criminal is no hero. No Churchill. And no friend of Europecor America. He should be treated accordingly.
Mike Barson retweeted
Thank you all for the 2.5 million views on the handover episode with Baron.
Today will be his first day filling in for me!
Hope you guys enjoy.
@baroncoleman
youtube.com/live/3Cp9TwQM7cM…
Mike Barson retweeted
The Kafkaesque UK laws adopted under the Starmer gov to appease Israel are such that you'll get arrested for terrorism if you hold a sign saying I support Palestine Action.
But if you hold a sign saying "I suppport Genocide. I oppose Palestine Action," then you'll be fine...
Mike Barson retweeted
Softball Interviews for a Little Dictator
Over the past two weeks, Zelensky has given more than a dozen interviews to Western media outlets. And not one journalist — not a single one — has uttered the word “busification.”
In Ukraine, this term describes the forced mobilization of thousands of Ukrainian men — men snatched off the streets, dragged out of cafés, seized on buses, and sent to the front lines to kill and be killed against their will.
Why don't Western legacy media journalists ask about these men?
Why don't they ask why Ukrainian border guards tried to kill a Ukrainian man attempting to escape across the Dniester River into Moldova?
Why don't they ask about the dozens who froze to death in the forests or drowned in rivers, risking everything in a desperate attempt to escape this open-air prison called Ukraine, the "beacon of freedom and democracy"? Men who would rather risk their lives fleeing their own country than be forced to die in a war they never chose to fight.
Why don't they ask about the tens of thousands of Ukrainian men detained at the border while desperately trying to flee the country?
Why don't they ask about the hundreds of thousands of men who have deserted and gone AWOL from the Ukrainian army?
Is it because these questions would shatter the narrative that Ukraine, with the West's help, has spent years so carefully constructing — the myth of a nation united in its overwhelming desire to “fight until victory”?
Because the truth is far less convenient, isn't it?
You are erasing hundreds of thousands of voices.
The voices of people who want Peace, not war.
The voices of those who reject Zelensky's escalation, bankrolled by Brussels and cheered on by its increasingly hawkish rhetoric.
You make these people invisible. Unwelcomed. And even hostile to — and threatening to your power.
You deny them a voice, a face, a place in the story.
You bury them beneath the deafening clatter of weapons.
And then you call it journalism.
Mike Barson retweeted
One more amazing thing about Brazil and Lula's campaign:
The NYT today has a gushing profile of a Congressman named @AndreJanonesMG, who became the face of Lula's campaign, its chief communication strategist. and -- as a result of admittedly innovative though extremely creepy digital strategies -- the greatest hero of the Brazilian left. But listen to what the article doesn't mention:
Just 2 years ago -- not 20 years ago or 10 years ago, but 2 years ago -- Janones got caught committing one of the most despicable crimes imaginable: he forced his Congressional staff employees to transfer a portion of their (quite low) monthly public salary to him as a condition for keeping their jobs. The money he stole from his workers didn't go to his campaign: it just went to enrich himself, into his pocket,.
He got caught when the employees secretly taped him angrily telling them they should stop complaining. When all this emerged, the left-wing members of Congress loyal to Lula -- who, remember, claims to lead a movement of workers! The name of Lula's party is the Workers Party -- protected him from all consequences from stealing the salary of his workers.
The pro-Lula judiciary let Janones confess guilt and simply pay back the money that he stole. And yet this doesn't bother anyone on the Brazilian left. Janones has become a beloved figure overnight among left-wing celebrities and is now one of Lula's closest allies. The NYT profile doesn't even mention this in their gushing profile.
In the scheme of Brazil's authoritarianism, it's not the biggest issue, but to me it's one of the most revealing about what frauds these people are:
Mike Barson retweeted
THIS IS THE NEXT BIG UK SCANDAL
The Hidden Credit Line scandal has run since the 2000s.
NatWest (@NatWestGroup), Royal Bank of Scotland (@RBS_Help) and Ulster Bank (@UlsterBankNI) sold business owners loans with an interest rate swap attached.
It was marketed as protection if rates rose. It actually created hidden exposure against the customer's own assets that nobody clearly explained. When rates fell after 2008, banks used that exposure to call in debts, strip assets and push profitable businesses into insolvency.
Steve Middleton (@stevemiddi1) and Mark Wright, a former RBS manager, built BankConfidential (@BankConfidenti1) to collect the evidence.
Mark Wright put in about £60,000 of his own pension. Neither made a penny and both lost their careers for telling the truth.
In November 2022 they met the FCA (@TheFCA) with Lord Prem Sikka (@premnsikka) and derivatives expert Ian Tyler.
James Hurley (@jameshurley) of @thetimes had already written 4 articles calling it financial and accounting fraud. The FCA let NatWest review itself and concluded it was not technically criminal fraud.
BankConfidential published its full report in November 2025. On 14 April 2026 it prompted a Westminster Hall debate led by John McDonnell (@johnmcdonnellMP), chair of the APPG on Investment Fraud and Fairer Financial Services (@appgonifandffs). MPs asked for a judge led statutory inquiry under the Inquiries Act 2005. Six reviews had already produced no justice.
Ian Byrne (@IanByrneMP) said this scandal belongs alongside Hillsborough, Post Office Horizon and infected blood. He also noted the FCA is a private company limited by guarantee with immunity from civil liability.
Andrew Candy was hit with an undisclosed £70,000 break cost. He lost his business and family home and spent 17 years seeking answers.
Economic Secretary Lucy Rigby (@LucyRigby) replied that the FCA is independent and ministers should be careful about interfering.
The regulator failed for over a decade, and its independence is now the reason given for not investigating that failure.
Nobody has gone to prison... yet.
Sources: @stevemiddi1, @BankConfidenti1, @jameshurley, @thetimes, Hansard Westminster Hall debate 14 April 2026, @johnmcdonnellMP, @IanByrneMP, @appgonifandffs, @TransparencyTF, @TheFCA, @LucyRigby, @_moneymarketing
Mike Barson retweeted
I am in the absolute best mood over this Macron dismissal. Feels like a year and a half of my family having to deal with psychotic lies regarding pending bankruptcies, secret accounts and plans to flee the country, has finally come to end.
For those of you wondering what happens now with the case, here is a synopsis:
You will note the Macrons additionally named two other business entities in their lawsuit: Candace Owens LLC and GeorgeTom Inc. They admitted in our hearing that they were unsure if one or both of these entities housed the podcast and that they would need limited discovery to determine how those businesses run and who runs them.
As it turns out, one of the above mentioned entities has absolutely nothing to do with the podcast in any way, shape, or form, so it will be a legal exercise in futility for the couple.
In effect, that leaves just one entity.
In addition to my personal dismissal, the court also decided in favor of our argument that France’s defamation law should apply.
Let me explain to you why that decision deeply impacts matters and was a major point of legal contention; France’s defamation law has a statute of limitation of just 3 months. This means defamation claims time out very quickly.
We argued the Macron couple was intentionally forum shopping because being held to France’s 3 months would have naturally expired their claims. We included a briefing from a French legal expert explaining French defamation law.
The Macrons did not submit a briefing to counter our arguments, but during oral arguments they suggested that France has a unique statutory law that could, in theory, extend claims up to one year IF the defamation claim pertains to an individual’s sexual orientation or gender.
Before ruling on the dismissal pertaining to the remaining entities, the judge is allowing for the Macron couple to submit a supplemental brief, arguing why they believe this case could meet that threshold
In his response (see below), the Judge has duly noted our legal expert’s notation that in parallel cases filed by the Presidential couple against other journalists in France, the couple sued under France’s 3 month defamation rule—not the one year statutory.
I believe it is worth again noting that the couple is NOT and has never sued anyone for matters pertaining to sex, sexual orientation, or gender (despite intentional media misrepresentations), but rather for defamation related to claims regarding MK Ultra and theft.
You are free to read their initial filing against me yourself.
So what happens now is the remaining entities and the Macrons submit additional briefings regarding French law and statutes. The judge will then rule on the lingering dismissals.
🚨BREAKING NEWS:
I was just personally dismissed from the Macron lawsuit filed against me in Delaware.
This case represents one of the grossest, legal overreaches by a foreign government leader in human history—a sitting President’s attempt to personally bankrupt a single podcaster from outside the nation in which he governs.
And to formally reiterate since many reporters willfully lied about this most important detail: I was NEVER being sued for stating that Brigitte Macron was born a male. I was instead being sued for discussing MK Ultra and for allegedly accusing the “First Lady” of theft from her sister.
I am tremendously grateful to the Delaware courts and to the presiding Judge for looking at this case objectively, despite false media depictions and government pressures.
Mike Barson retweeted
lead singer of the band Primal Scream Bobby Gillespie is confronted by a BBC "reporter" on his pro-Palestine activism and support for BDS, and refuses to back down as he calls out artists who gleefully legitimize the genocidal Israeli death-cult.
"It's stolen land."
Mike Barson retweeted
0.001% TAX
A junior auditor at @PwC in Luxembourg is getting ready to leave his job. Before he goes he goes looking for some training documents to take with him.
Instead he finds a folder that anyone in the company could open. No password. No warning. Just sitting there.
Inside are hundreds of secret deals between the Luxembourg government and some of the biggest companies on the planet. Deals that let them pay next to nothing in tax.
His name is Antoine Deltour. He copies 30,000 pages. That is the whole story. He copies a folder.
Let me explain what was actually in it, because this is where it gets interesting.
Between 2002 and 2010, PwC alone helped broker 548 of these secret tax agreements, known as tax rulings, for over 340 companies. Apple. Ikea. Pepsi. Disney. Deutsche Bank. AIG. Koch Industries. Skype. GlaxoSmithKline. Coach. Abbott Laboratories. Household names, every one of them.
The trick was simple. Companies moved profits through Luxembourg shell structures and Luxembourg quietly agreed in writing to look the other way on tax.
Some of these companies ended up paying an effective tax rate under 1 percent. In some cases as low as 0.001 percent. On billions of dollars.
Who was running Luxembourg for almost 20 years while this machine was built and protected? Jean-Claude Juncker, Prime Minister of Luxembourg until 2013.
Deltour did not leak straight to the world. In 2012 he passed the documents to French journalist Edouard Perrin, who used them for a TV documentary.
PwC noticed and filed a complaint with the Luxembourg courts. Then in November 2014, ICIJ @ICIJorg pulled together over 80 journalists across more than 30 media outlets in 26 countries and published the full scale of it as LuxLeaks.
The timing could not have been worse for Juncker, or depending how you look at it, could not have been better. He had just been elected President of the European Commission days before the story broke. The man who ran the tax haven for two decades was now running Europe.
A month later ICIJ dropped LuxLeaks 2, showing the other Big 4 accounting firms Deloitte, EY and KPMG were running the exact same playbook. This was never one bad apple. It was standard practice.
Juncker faced a no confidence vote in the European Parliament over it. He survived. Deltour was not so lucky.
December 2014, Luxembourg charges him with theft, violation of trade secrecy and fraudulent access to a computer system. He is facing up to 5 years in prison and a fine of 1,250,000 euros. For opening an unlocked folder on his way out the door.
April 2016, the criminal trial. Deltour and his colleague Raphael Halet, another former PwC employee who leaked a second batch of documents, are both convicted. Deltour gets 12 months suspended and a 1,500 euro fine. Perrin the journalist is acquitted.
Deltour appeals. Loses. Appeals again. Finally in May 2018 the Luxembourg Court of Appeal fully recognises him as a genuine whistleblower under European Court of Human Rights standards and acquits him completely.
Halet's fight took even longer. He lost his Luxembourg appeals and only won at the European Court of Human Rights Grand Chamber in 2023, nearly a decade after he first spoke up.
The European Commission that Juncker went on to lead never opened a single formal investigation into a single LuxLeaks tax ruling. Not one. It did chase Starbucks, Fiat and Amazon over separate deals, but the mountain of paperwork Deltour handed over sat there untouched.
So that is the LuxLeaks story. Build a tax avoidance machine for 20 years and get promoted to run the continent. Copy the evidence of it and spend most of a decade fighting to stay out of prison.
@BBCNews · @ICIJorg · @Reuters · @lemondefr and others.
Mike Barson retweeted
Watch this.
Lubna Speitan, author of the Greens4Palestine motion “Zionism is racism”, spells out the central obscenity of our age – the grotesque inversion whereby the victims of ethnic cleansing, Apartheid and genocide must constantly fend off accusations from their tormentors that it is they who are the racists.
“We as Palestinians are being silenced and gaslit and vilified [as we] witness the annihilation, the cold-blooded murder of our families, of our people… our children burnt with phosphorus, having to endure amputations with no anaesthetic, having their limbs torn and shredded, their bodies burnt by phosphorus, being starved to death … And to have to sit here … and try to bury my feelings so I can eloquently and diplomatically shield my anger, my rage, my anguish that every Palestinian is feeling, is an insult.” /1
Mike Barson retweeted
280 community notes from just ONE person. Just incredible. Every day people wake up and just fictionalize narratives about me. I work for Russia, I work for the Vatican, I work for Israel, I’m funded by Qatar, I’m getting a divorce, I’m a lesbian, I was in love with Charlie, I secretly hated Charlie, I have a mansion that houses my illegal 8 nannies, my husband is Mi6, I’m reading ads for the Mossad, I’m hiding money in secret LLCs for fear of bankruptcy. I plan to flee to Russia.
I’m Time’s Most Vile Person of the year.
Like what actually is there left to make up about my life. Where do we go from here? I want you guys to think carefully about this while I’m on maternity leave because I think I’ve made it clear that I AM NOT LETTING THE DEEP STATE, PUBLIC ASSASINATION OF CHARLES JAMES KIRK GO. He was an innocent young man who didn’t deserve the betrayal and death sentence he received.
Thank you for your attention to this matter!
Community Notes on Laura Loomer posts about @RealCandaceO.
Every one labeled misleading.
Here they are.
Mike Barson retweeted
Please keep sharing this video widely. Six days after conclusively revealing that Brian Cole Jr. cannot be the J6 b0mber, it may seem we are being ignored, but I can report that "official Washington" is absolutely VERY aware of this video and its implications. That includes MSM outlets, Congress, DOJ, FBI, etc.
@accabbat has updated this to include a couple more of Brian's clothing items with the tags still hanging. On Thursday, I went back into Brian's room to dig around for more clues, and sure enough, I found several more jackets and pullovers with the tags still on them. (Original thread linked in first comment, with our longer "explainer" video.) ⬇️
Mike Barson retweeted
Thank you guys for all of the love tonight! That was a tremendous uplift going through the case from the beginning and assessing the various holes, twists, and evidence—but it was such an important refresher one year on, made only better by @baroncoleman!
Thank you to all the YouTube creators that we mentioned (and the many more we didn’t) for your steady contributions over the last year.
Thank you especially to our army of sleuths around the world who we simply could not have compiled this much information without.
I’ll be sure to pop in, but I’m sure going to miss seeing you guys regularly.
Go max.
youtube.com/live/IAVSN4vuCx0…
Mike Barson retweeted
Free Brian Cole Jr.
This entire case is despicable.
Credit to @SteveBakerUSA and his team for not letting this case go despite the years of federal lies and gaslighting.
Real journalism.
Brian Cole Jr supported Trump even though his family supports Democrats.
This is the pay back he gets from the Trump administration. They set him up as the fall guy knowing full well the pipe bomber was a Capitol police officer.
@POTUS you are vile.