Headlines like this are how a jury of millions reaches its verdict before the real jury does. Russell Brand denies all charges. Under British law he is innocent until proven guilty. But the prosecution always goes first, so the most damning lines dominate the headlines in week one. By the time the defence speaks, the cameras have moved on. I saw this first hand covering the Tommy Robinson trial. Day after day, the allegations made the news. The defence case barely registered. "A court heard" is not "a court found." Most people never read past the headline. So here's the question: should there be tighter limits on trial reporting until a verdict is reached? Or is open justice worth the cost?