Fair and honest assessment, all should be made accountable when other peoples monies are involved. All transparency, otherwise a red flag goes up just like this.
I want to go on record saying that I don’t condone attacking Scott Presler for his sexual orientation.
But I would like to sincerely ask all of the people who keep rushing to his defense to please consider something.
If we take for granted that Scott was once a poor guy, traveling around in his car on his own to register voters- that’s not who he is now today, and hasn’t been for some time.
He’s now a grown man, around 40 years old, running a multimillion-dollar operation whose stated goal is voter registration and helping Republicans win elections.
He’s earning a high six-figure annual income from his X account alone.
He has around 3,500 monthly subscribers on X, each paying him $3 a month. That’s over $10K a month BEFORE being paid out by the X creator program, which brings in an additional five figures every month.
The point is:
My public criticisms of Scott have never been based on his sexuality, his appearance, or his demeanor.
I have ONLY criticized glaring gaps and discrepancies in what Scott tells people on social media about the work he’s doing, the results he’s getting, and the impact it is having.
I have asked many questions about things I believe are VERY serious instances of misleading the public, bordering on misconduct.
Each time I’ve brought these things up, I am besieged by a mob of Scott’s supporters who tell me I’m only asking these questions because I’m jealous, or because I must have been turned down by Scott. Not once have any of these people been willing to simply address the concerns I’ve raised.
This behavior has never made sense—but it CERTAINLY does not make sense anymore and cannot be tolerated in the face of a MASSIVE defeat for Republicans like we had on Tuesday.
This is not me-or others asking the same questions- picking on a poor, defenseless guy who’s sleeping in his car and volunteering to register voters.
This is me asking the CEO of a multimillion-dollar operation that claims to flip districts red through its voter registration efforts-
and who is being paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for this work-
to explain MASSIVE holes and discrepancies in the organization’s claims and the handling of its finances, which I believe also shows signs of significant corruption.
Charlie Kirk would have had to answer questions like this. I would have to answer questions like this. James O’Keefe has had to answer questions like this. Dennis Prager would have to answer questions like this.
So why are the rules different for Scott?
Any other CEO of any other organization with this consistent track record of failure, while the CEO is making a fortune and the organization is bringing in millions—which are NOT being used for the stated goal of the organization—would have to be accountable and AT LEAST provide answers, transparency, and accountability to the public about what’s going on.
Scott refuses to answer any of these questions, but continues massive fundraising and an ongoing track record of failure.
Scott Presler is not a child. He’s not a homeless man registering voters out of the kindness of his heart.
It is time to stop treating him like a baby and begin treating him like a CEO whose organization is not delivering on its promises—and which I believe is not operating in the good faith that the public has been misled to believe.
For these reasons, and because I am tired of Republicans losing elections that could have been prevented, I am NOT going to stop asking these questions about Scott Presler. I am going to continue to publish my findings about what is going on with this operation.
If people want to keep shielding him from accountability and treating him like he’s an infant who can’t answer for himself and try to shame me into silence by accusing me of being jealous or a jilted lover- I do not care.
The truth matters.
I will continue investigating these concerns and publicly sharing my findings, regardless of the pressure or criticism I receive on social media.
Michelle 🦘 retweeted
I want to go on record saying that I don’t condone attacking Scott Presler for his sexual orientation.
But I would like to sincerely ask all of the people who keep rushing to his defense to please consider something.
If we take for granted that Scott was once a poor guy, traveling around in his car on his own to register voters- that’s not who he is now today, and hasn’t been for some time.
He’s now a grown man, around 40 years old, running a multimillion-dollar operation whose stated goal is voter registration and helping Republicans win elections.
He’s earning a high six-figure annual income from his X account alone.
He has around 3,500 monthly subscribers on X, each paying him $3 a month. That’s over $10K a month BEFORE being paid out by the X creator program, which brings in an additional five figures every month.
The point is:
My public criticisms of Scott have never been based on his sexuality, his appearance, or his demeanor.
I have ONLY criticized glaring gaps and discrepancies in what Scott tells people on social media about the work he’s doing, the results he’s getting, and the impact it is having.
I have asked many questions about things I believe are VERY serious instances of misleading the public, bordering on misconduct.
Each time I’ve brought these things up, I am besieged by a mob of Scott’s supporters who tell me I’m only asking these questions because I’m jealous, or because I must have been turned down by Scott. Not once have any of these people been willing to simply address the concerns I’ve raised.
This behavior has never made sense—but it CERTAINLY does not make sense anymore and cannot be tolerated in the face of a MASSIVE defeat for Republicans like we had on Tuesday.
This is not me-or others asking the same questions- picking on a poor, defenseless guy who’s sleeping in his car and volunteering to register voters.
This is me asking the CEO of a multimillion-dollar operation that claims to flip districts red through its voter registration efforts-
and who is being paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for this work-
to explain MASSIVE holes and discrepancies in the organization’s claims and the handling of its finances, which I believe also shows signs of significant corruption.
Charlie Kirk would have had to answer questions like this. I would have to answer questions like this. James O’Keefe has had to answer questions like this. Dennis Prager would have to answer questions like this.
So why are the rules different for Scott?
Any other CEO of any other organization with this consistent track record of failure, while the CEO is making a fortune and the organization is bringing in millions—which are NOT being used for the stated goal of the organization—would have to be accountable and AT LEAST provide answers, transparency, and accountability to the public about what’s going on.
Scott refuses to answer any of these questions, but continues massive fundraising and an ongoing track record of failure.
Scott Presler is not a child. He’s not a homeless man registering voters out of the kindness of his heart.
It is time to stop treating him like a baby and begin treating him like a CEO whose organization is not delivering on its promises—and which I believe is not operating in the good faith that the public has been misled to believe.
For these reasons, and because I am tired of Republicans losing elections that could have been prevented, I am NOT going to stop asking these questions about Scott Presler. I am going to continue to publish my findings about what is going on with this operation.
If people want to keep shielding him from accountability and treating him like he’s an infant who can’t answer for himself and try to shame me into silence by accusing me of being jealous or a jilted lover- I do not care.
The truth matters.
I will continue investigating these concerns and publicly sharing my findings, regardless of the pressure or criticism I receive on social media.
Michelle 🦘 retweeted
I've lived in Texas for 21 years. Gina Hinajosa was a little known state representative. @GovHotWheels_TX (Greg Abbott) has practically 100% name recognition.
How exactly -- I wants facts now -- did he get more votes than last time and lose by 7%?
Not rhetorical. I want to know.
It is difficult to imagine people being as ugly on the inside as they are on the outside. Their "apology" is a mere recognition that there are pecuniary consequences to being astounding demonic assholes. I pity the people in their respective families.
Michelle 🦘 retweeted
🚨 NOW: Rep. Tim Burchett just angrily STORMED OUT of a committee meeting saying a backroom deal was cut to let Democrats control what they do!
"We're going to BLOW IT because we're not acting like we're in the majority! [We] allow the Democrats to tell us what to do. It's just UNBELIEVABLE!"
"At some point we're going to have to give some guts. This town is crooked as a dog's leg and I'm disgusted."
"Had some amendments that were cutting regulation things that we should, as Republicans, do. Because of backroom deals they cut, they won't allow any amendments on the bill because the Democrats didn't agree to it! So here we are in the majority and we're not allowed to do that!"
"And I guarantee you when the Democrats are in the majority, which they very much could be because of this kind of garbage — [they won't do this]."
"I want to FIGHT." 🔥
Five Senators signatures are needed to postpone leadership elections in the Senate.
This is our ONLY chance to STOP John Thune from being elected as leader again.
Sen. Ron Johnson has been BEGGING all day and so far only FOUR have signed.
• Ron Johnson (WI)
• Mike Lee (UT)
• Rick Scott (FL)
• John Kennedy (LA)
It makes me PHYSICALLY SICK that five Senators don't have the balls to stand up to Thune FOR AMERICA.
We are actually DOOMED.
Michelle 🦘 retweeted
This is good news 👍
Ron Johnson has the (5) votes required
Johnson is using this mechanism to stop Thune from running unopposed (Closed-door, no debate) this is a tool to stop him from automatic reinstallation
JD Vance as Senate Prez should sit in
Michelle 🦘 retweeted
This woman needs to go on Rogan’s show and speak for 3 hours explaining WHAT THE HELL IS REALLY GOING ON🫨! I guess when you study something for 50 years (like DJT has) you become an expert on it🇺🇸. This woman has really opened my mind up👊
👏👏👏👏
🚨 BILL MAHER PUTS HAKEEM JEFFRIES ON NOTICE!
Jeffries says Stephen Miller should be “eradicated like a malignant tumor.” Maher calls out the outrageous rhetoric.
Imagine claiming to defend democracy while talking about a political opponent as if he were a disease that needs to be eradicated. That's not political debate — that's dangerous dehumanizing language.
Michelle 🦘 retweeted
Replying to @MaryPeltola
You have ruined the credibility of ranked choice voting for all time. The system that all the institutions are trying to push on us as the fairest system and helps resolve polarization.
Then, the first close race you got, you intentionally seek out someone else named Dan Sullivan and run him to confuse the voters.
The only positive side of all this is that you are blatantly destroying credibility in the "democracy" ecosystem pushing structural reform down all our throats. It was never about unity. It was always about a power grab and creating a one-party dictatorship.
This is why the theme of the last two years of the Trump administration will be "Defend the Republic." You guys are pulling a coup on us all in a million directions, and we see it.
Michelle 🦘 retweeted
🚨 JUST IN: Sen. Rick Scott joins in with Mike Lee wanting Senate to cancel vacation to Confirm 135 of President Trump’s Nominees
I DEFINITELY AGREE WITH RICK SCOTT
Michelle 🦘 retweeted
Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI) is gathering signatures to postpone the leadership vote in the Senate.
As of right now, he only has 5 signatures.
Contact your Republican Senators & ask them to join Sen. Johnson’s letter.
Michelle 🦘 retweeted
This evil, botoxed-to-the-hilt witch was laughing about digging up the body of Charlie Kirk and killing him. Again.
A 31 year old husband and father.
Why? Because he was an outspoken conservative.
What kind of companies support that kind of depravity?
@Casper @BollAndBranch @CozyEarth @joinember @irestorelaser @ZipRecruiter @Nutrafol
Guess they don't want our business.
Cash App did the right thing and dropped her.
Who else sponsors her hate-filled show?
Michelle 🦘 retweeted
Every single federal judicial vacancy needs to be filled in the lame duck session. The Senate should pull all-nighters for as long as it takes. Democrats wont confirm a single Trump judge once they take over.
Michelle 🦘 retweeted
Grow up, Pramila. Bullying and trolling are not really the role of members of Congress. You are a public servant. Act like it.
By the way, knitting is a skill. Acquiring some skills is part of a healthy, balanced life. I recommend this to you. No need to be hateful all day!
Absolutely a disgraceful human being.
🚨 JUST IN: Leftist witch podcaster Jennifer Welch and her show have issued a PATHETIC apology after companies like Cash App and Chewy pulled their sponsorship of the show due to their Charlie Kirk m*rder remarks
EVERY COMPANY should IMMEDIATELY pull out of this scumbag's show or they are complicit in political violence!
They laughed for about 30 seconds at "We're digging up Charlie Kirk and doing it again" and expect us all to think it's an innocent joke
Cash App said, "We do not condone violence of any kind, and we are no longer sponsors of this podcast." Boll & Branch and Lola Blankets have cut ties too.
Michelle 🦘 retweeted
Let me be clear to all who are claiming the election was rigged or stolen or whatever -- the DOJ can investigate and should investigate any such claims.
The Trump administration is still in office and will remain so for more than two years. If there's a problem with the results -- they should investigate.
@AGToddBlanche
























