Pinned Tweet
If you haven't already, check out my predatory publishing op-ed and new outlandish piece that builds on it. It was even featured by the man himself, Dr. Donald Ingber, head of the Wyss Institute at @Harvard.
Static Universe with 1st principles redshift = 1
Expanding Universe with 1st principles redshift = 0
But hey I guess we already mapped the entire universe from this planet.
"This circumstance of an expanding universe is irritating."
Einstein did not like the idea that the universe had a beginning or that it was constantly changing in size. He preferred a static and eternal universe that was balanced by a cosmological constant, a term he added to his own equations of general relativity.
However, many scientists who studied his equations found solutions that suggested otherwise. One of them was George Lemaitre, a Belgian priest and physicist, who proposed in 1927 that the universe began with a “primeval atom” that exploded and gave rise to the expanding universe. He also predicted that the expansion rate of the universe should be proportional to its distance from the center of the explosion, a relation now known as Hubble’s law.
Another scientist who challenged Einstein’s view was Edwin Hubble, an American astronomer, who observed in 1929 that the galaxies were receding from each other at a speed that increased with their distance, confirming Lemaitre’s prediction. He also showed that the universe was not static, but dynamic and evolving.
Einstein was initially reluctant to accept these findings, but he eventually changed his mind and admitted that his cosmological constant was a mistake. He said that Lemaitre’s theory was "the most beautiful and satisfactory explanation of creation to which I have ever listened". He also praised Hubble’s work and said that it was "one of the greatest discoveries in science".
Initial quote was A. Einstein's remarks on the Big Bang and the expanding universe as mentioned in a letter to Willem de Sitter.
Source: HAVE ASTRONOMERS by Robert Jastrow, 1978.
Michael Aaron Cody retweeted
"String theory has not established itself as an account of what the universe is... But dismissing the whole field as wasted intelligence misses what theoretical work does and what it’s supposed to be about." by @MichaelCody realclearscience.com/article…
Theoretical science means exploring ideas and seeing where they lead. I’m not a fan of string theory, but there’s reason to keep studying it. How much we should spend is another question. @RCScience @fchollet @elonmusk @karch_andreas @skdh
realclearscience.com/article…
Michael Aaron Cody retweeted
Coherent Beam Combining Delivery Method in Havana Syndrome.
This March 21, 2026 article in @RCDefense by Michael Aaron Cody sheds critical new light on how pulsed microwaves can be delivered directly into the human brain in Havana Syndrome cases.
Unlike most analysts, Cody refuses to limit the delivery system to a single emitter. He instead highlights a proven technique that projects two electromagnetic fields designed to intersect inside the brain, creating a precise energy hotspot.
Known as Coherent Beam Combining, this method was prominently featured in the FOIA-released 2022 IC Expert Panel Assessment on Anomalous Health Incidents (AHI), - only to be completely dismissed in every subsequent Intelligence Community report. realcleardefense.com/article…
Cosmology lesson. Redshift is the most basic cosmological observable we have, but where it comes from was never derived.
ΛCDM
MOND
MOG
All pull it from FLRW a(t), an assumed metric. Now there's a first-principles redshift that isn't FLRW: K(t) - and it's static. Odd, ain't it?
Infinite curvature isn't physics. It's where the description fails.
Glad to see that argument from my Springer paper picked up in new work on the Planck epoch by Prof. Aleksandr Raikov in @FrontiersIn in AI.
doi.org/10.3389/frai.2026.19…
The Nobel Prize trades in prestige, but science itself never has. It happens in the mud, with the researchers, technicians, and students whose names never make it to Stockholm.
@NobelPrize @nobelprize
realclearscience.com/article…
Michael Aaron Cody retweeted
This year's Nobel Prize for medicine or physiology reveals the problems with limiting the award to only three scientists. Vital contributors are left out. by @MichaelCody realclearscience.com/article…
Static cosmology a dead field since Crawford in 2024 (RIP).
In 2026, I may be the only serious voice it has left. The odd part isn't that there's no hope for it. It's that static cosmology now has the one thing expanding cosmology never had: a first-principles redshift law.
realclearscience.com/article…
Michael Aaron Cody retweeted
"The Big Bang is a remarkable theory, the best account we have, but exactly what it tells us about the whole universe is still open to the rigor of science and debate." by @MichaelCody realclearscience.com/article…
New piece in @RCScience. @Britannica said the Big Bang happened everywhere at once. We have evidence for a hot early universe, but how do we know it happened everywhere, including places we cannot observe? I wrote about that.
realclearscience.com/article…
The algorithm on X sucks @elonmusk can we do better please.
Interesting paper by Anto Lonappan, @BrianKeating and Kam Arnold. A twist in the CMB's light could come from space (β) or from a detector pointed slightly off (α). Comparing detectors checks their alignment, since the shared twist cancels out. They found the two methods agree, which is good news for the birefringence measurements built on this data.
arxiv.org/abs/2609.09149
New paper by Kroupa, @eda_gjergo & Samaras,
"The relevance of the cosmic microwave background for cosmology."
Great paper, but incomplete. Section 4.6 cites everything but the one paper proving the CMB doesn't require an expanding universe.
arxiv.org/abs/2609.10672
Flexible Static Cosmology.
No cosmological constant.
No post-hoc dataset tuning.
No assumed redshift mechanism.
1st principles redshift transport law within General Relativity. Step by step.
Four papers. Two journals. Ten referees.
researchgate.net/publication…
Static universes were declared dead around 1930. In 2026, they are back.
Flexible Static Cosmology derives geometry and a first-principles redshift mechanism within GR. Expansion is sufficient, not uniquely necessary. Published and peer-reviewed.
Paper-doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2026.179…












