60 years ago, my Great Grandparents organized a rally against segregation. Proud of their legacy.

Vote NO on Amendment 87! #copolitics

““The most dangerous things in Denver right now are not guns. They are not speeding cars; they are little blue pills of fentanyl, and it’s not even close,” Johnston said, noting that nearly 350 people in Denver have died from drug overdoses over the past year.” #copolitics denverpost.com/2026/10/15/de…

The funding for treatment comes from the $50 billion state budget. This measure is both necessary and common sense - which is why even a majority of Democratic voters in Colorado support it! #copolitics

Thanks for asking! 1. It would be a $2.7 billion blank check for politicians. 2. It would allow for “added taxes” on everyone’s income. 3. It would put tax deductions for seniors and veterans at risk. Good news, though! People are realizing it - and opposition is growing. #copolitics

People are seeing through all the misleading claims from the proponents of Amendment 87! Vote NO. #copolitics

Denver Post saying to vote no on Amendment 87 and yes on Prop 132 this year. Let’s go! #copolitics

People just have to read the ballot question. Amendment 87 would allow for “added taxes” on income. Very straightforward. Good to see voters getting educated about what this measure really does! #copolitics

The Denver Post is right about Prop 132. It would provide a pathway for treatment for users, while holding fentanyl dealers accountable. Vote Yes! #copolitics

Top reasons to vote against Amendment 87: -It’s a $2.7 billion blank check to politicians -It allows for added taxes on everyone’s income -It puts tax deductions at risk for seniors and veterans #copolitics

The constitution supersedes any statute. #copolitics

Of course the measure provides more treatment. The state would be mandated to provide it. Treatment is the best way to save lives! #copolitics

Colorado is one of only 4 states to see an increase in fentanyl overdose deaths. Is this measure backed by people who care about saving lives? It is. #copolitics

If 3.4% is hot, what was it under a Biden? #copolitics

Thanks Scott! The measure requires all taxable net income to be taxed. This would be a strict mandate in the state constitution. State deductions and subtractions would be on the chopping block. It’s pretty straightforward. Bell Policy made a choice to do it this way. #copolitics

Blaming Title Board is a weak argument. Bell Policy chose to use sloppy language in order to avoid needing to get 55%. I’m sure they already regret it. #copolitics

Buffs win!! #GoBuffs

Prop NN and progressive tax hike are literally running the measures together. Trying to take $7.2 billion from Coloradans. #copolitics

Scott, I fully believe that if you were still in charge at Bell this wouldn’t have happened. But the new guy put a line in that requires all income to be taxed. That has a big impact on deductions and subtractions. And it would be in the Constitution. Voters deserve to know! #copolitics

Not only would all seniors on social security and veterans with military pensions pay more under your tax hike, but you’re also working directly with Prop NN supporters to raise taxes on all Coloradans by taking away their TABOR tax refunds. That’s up to $7.2 billion in increased taxes! #copolitics

On pace to waste even more $ this time! #copolitics