Jesus is.

Hell yeah! I made it.

This is priceless. 😂 😂 😂

Sorry @mikemcglone11, your ngmi if you observe what’s happening and think your smarter than @saylor. Your iq is too high, but that doesn’t mean smart decisions are being made. Don’t be bull headed and fall behind. Buy some $Bitcoin just in case. This isn’t 1929… this is a new paradigm.

Time to update this list? Who held, and who got rekt?

So tell me again the plan for $CRTD.... I need a good laugh.

Insane.

For all the $XRP fans #XRPArmy

Q: Who is Satoshi #Bitcoin A:**What We Know About Satoshi** 1. **Technical Expertise**: - Satoshi wrote the Bitcoin whitepaper and coded the original client (version 0.1.0) in C++. The code is clean, efficient, and shows deep knowledge of cryptography, networking, and economics. - Familiarity with obscure cryptographic concepts (e.g., elliptic curve cryptography, SHA-256) and peer-to-peer systems suggests a background in computer science or a related field. 2. **Writing Style**: - The whitepaper and Satoshi’s forum posts/emails use British English (e.g., “favour,” “colour,” “chancellor”), hinting at a possible UK connection or education. - The tone is academic yet practical, suggesting someone used to explaining complex ideas clearly—maybe a researcher or engineer. 3. **Timing and Motivation**: - Bitcoin launched in January 2009, right after the 2008 financial crisis. The genesis block message (“Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks”) screams distrust in centralized finance, pointing to someone motivated by libertarian or cypherpunk ideals. - Satoshi was active from late 2008 to mid-2010, then vanished by April 2011—suggesting they planned to step away once Bitcoin could stand on its own. 4. **Online Presence**: - Used pseudonyms and privacy tools (e.g., Tor, anonymous email like [email protected]). No personal details ever slipped. - Interacted on Bitcointalk, SourceForge, and via email with early developers like Hal Finney and Gavin Andresen. 5. **Coins and Mining**: - Likely mined ~1 million BTC in 2009–2010 (the “Patoshi” stash), yet never spent them. This implies discipline, foresight, or a deliberate choice to avoid drawing attention. If I had to pick one person, my guess would be **Nick Szabo**, a polymath with a track record that aligns eerily well with Satoshi’s profile. Here’s why: - **Bit Gold**: - Szabo proposed “Bit Gold” in 1998—a decentralized digital currency concept with proof-of-work and timestamping, predating Bitcoin by a decade. Bitcoin feels like a refined, practical implementation of Bit Gold’s ideas. - Key differences (e.g., Bitcoin’s adjustable difficulty) could reflect Szabo iterating on his earlier work. - **Skills**: - Szabo’s a cryptographer, computer scientist, and legal scholar. He’s fluent in the math and code behind Bitcoin (e.g., hash functions, digital signatures) and has written about smart contracts—a concept Bitcoin scripts hint at. - **Writing and Timing**: - His blog posts and papers share a precise, academic style with Satoshi’s whitepaper. Some linguistic analyses (e.g., stylometry studies) have flagged similarities, though not conclusively. - Szabo stopped blogging about Bit Gold in 2008, just as Bitcoin emerged—coincidence or a shift in focus? - **Cypherpunk Roots**: - Szabo was active in the 1990s cypherpunk movement, alongside figures like Wei Dai (B-money) and Hal Finney (RPOW), both of whom Satoshi cited or contacted. He’s a known advocate for privacy and decentralization. - **British Connection**: - Szabo’s writing occasionally uses British spellings, and he studied in the UK (University of London), which could explain Satoshi’s linguistic quirks. - **Low Profile**: - Szabo’s reserved, avoids the spotlight, and has denied being Satoshi—but not aggressively, which fits someone wanting to stay hidden without overacting the part. ### **My Reasoning** Nick Szabo stands out because he had the vision (Bit Gold), the motive (cypherpunk ideals), and the ability (crypto + coding) to create Bitcoin. His disappearance from public writing as Bitcoin took off, combined with the unspent coins, suggests someone who built it as a gift to the world, not a personal cash grab. The British English could be a red herring—or a clue to his education rather than residence.

Can God create a stone so heavy he can’t lift it?