Belleville, Ontario
Joined April 2022
Fucking hell, they just did it! The BBC actually described the Islamo-leftist riots burning France to the ground as “MOSTLY PEACEFUL”! But Danny Tommo puncturing a people smuggling boat is terrorism to them. Defund them NOW!
1,230
15,045
469
68,695
1,962,205
As expected, PROTESTS in Montreal Canada today in solidarity with the riots that happened in France today As I said, the same groups are already here. There is nothing grassroots about it and quite the contrary. Globally coordinated and ready to go. NOT GOOD 🇨🇦
170
1,064
44
4,419
43,795
Well, that was wild. I'm at the Australian Parliament and just left a meeting with two staffers for the governing party. They told us that the government needed more power to censor things like the upcoming US execution of Nidal Hasan. When I asked why they needed to censor that video, one said it was to prevent copycat killings. Copycat killings by governments? I asked. Er, no, they said. Copycat killings like of a backpacker, several decades ago. So, under that logic, I pointed out, the government should censor things like last year's Bondi massacre, where two Muslims killed 15 people, no? Well, that was news, they said. Didn't they realize their bill would allow the government to censor news? They didn't seem to know, or care. They also admitted that they did not know that the bill would allow the government to create and operate an unlimited number of fake social media accounts to attack its political enemies and spread disinformation. Having presented them with information they had never heard about a bill they had clearly not read, they emphasized to us, strenuously, that they were moving forward with the bill. So there you have it. The government wants the power to arbitrarily censor scenes of violent crime, or violence, for any reason. And it wants the power to use an unlimited number of fake accounts to wage offensive disinformational warfare against the Australian people. Given that the Bondi massacre last year increased public opposition to mass migration, and support for the populist One Nation Party, it seems obvious that the government wants to censor such events in order to protect its political power. It's quite telling how obediently governing party members insist such a law is needed without even knowing what's in it.
1,321
10,073
713
37,303
849,860
Derek T retweeted
It's almost impossible for me to believe that this silencing of my right to speak freely is rampant in England now, as if we were living in an authoritarian country
The British Government is preparing an apparatus of internet censorship without parallel in the modern era. At the UN, Andy Burnham announced the creation of a National Centre for Information Defence — Labour’s Ministry of Truth. The Prime Minister says the centre will protect us from hostile foreign powers such as Russia, which he accused of spreading lies and disinformation about Britain, amplifying “far-right narratives” and interfering in our democracy. But the real purpose is to suppress dissent and silence those who criticise the Government or express views about the state of the country that run counter to Labour’s prevailing progressive orthodoxy. FSU Director of Policy and Research David Rose has written a new briefing examining the threadbare research the Government has used to justify its plans. The Government is clutching at straws — and, ironically, already spreading misinformation about the threat of misinformation. It has ignored a wealth of evidence from leading academics to push ahead with its new censorship regime. Burnham’s Government is putting Britain in the same league as some of the world’s most authoritarian powers. Watch the new episode of the FSU Podcast with General Secretary of the FSU Lord Young of Acton on YouTube and read @DavidRoseUK’s report below 👇
1,321
6,060
174
24,896
268,299
Meanwhile in Great Britain..
5
46
2
587
11,477
I am saddened and embarrassed that this passes as national news. In essence, citizens are funding attacks on citizens, through subsidized media, through a court system where governments use public money to fight their own people, and through government itself. This is not about right versus left. It is about institutions turning against the people they are meant to serve. Public trust cannot survive when institutions treat citizens as the enemy and legitimate questions as threats. That is a dangerous path for any democracy.
21
64
7
366
20,777
Derek T retweeted
I hope Canadians open their eyes and see through Carney’s lies and see what’s really going on. Poor Canada! 🇨🇦 #Canada #Canadian
244
1,747
142
4,300
243,969
Derek T retweeted
📣 It is totally possible to abolish a Senate Nova Scotia abolished its Senate back in 1928 Why? Because it was undemocratic, unelected, and it cost too much! That was nearly a century ago and they figured that out! Surely (Shirley?) we can abolish the Senate in Ottawa too!
85
375
19
1,393
16,956
Because the cbc is not media. It’s a propaganda arm of the Canadian government.
20
61
730
2,776
Did France, Italy, or Germany lack culture before the Eurocrats took over and built their glass towers? Did they lack distinct values or national power? Absolutely not. They were rich, proud, independent nations. But look at what the globalist movement did to them once they signed away their sovereignty.
28
165
3
738
7,226
So over the past ten years, while Justin Trudeau’s Liberals were arguably destroying Canada’s national interests and economy through bad investment, social-welfare, and immigration decisions, a lack of strategic military foresight, and letting hostile states run wild while CSIS warned of existential sovereignty concerns — if we take the WSJ scoops from senior sources as representative of Carney’s philosophy — then in that same decade of Carney’s international banking and economic and corporate governance, while most average Canadians still saw the U.S. economy and society as a friend of Canada and a close ally, Carney was already arguing that Canada was too reliant on the United States and would need deeper engagements with the powers and financial systems of Europe (and China, per speeches the WSJ did not cover). None of this was explained in the Carney campaign. Canadians voted for it anyway. He was going to fix the “Trump issues,” and if the polls are to be believed — even while he is moving backwards on that file — they still hold him in very high regard, while now seeing the United States with about the same level of positivity as China. This all feels wrong. Firstly, what happens if Russia extends its aggression to more European states? Is Carney going to vibe Canada into a European military power while running an economic war with the NORAD partner?​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ Canada needs to be concerned first with our north and getting aligned with our NORAD partner, and the dual threat of China and Russia.
96
903
43
3,068
79,755
Derek T retweeted
1. Where is the secret Chinese security MOU? 2. Where are the details for the 100 year Ukraine partnership deal? 3. Where are the details about a ‘associate membership’ of the EU proposal? 4. Where are the details of the US trade deal you walked away from? 5. Where are the regulations for Chinese EVs on transmission and collection of data? 6. Do we have any reporters who ask simple questions any more?
113
979
41
2,658
25,604
With the majority of the mainstream media ignoring the @AllisonInquiry over the last 4 days it highlights how just how important independent journalists & media are today. Mainstream media is a farce. Yes they have the largest platform, but with each passing day more and more people are becoming aware that they are nothing more than propaganda arms of Governments and pharmaceutical companies. With that, I just want to thank the individuals who spent the last several days working tirelessly behind the scenes bringing us great interviews, content and the truth. You are needed now more than ever.
12
125
2
563
6,214
Derek T retweeted
Illuminating
Now the Third Man – Rudi Dutschke – The Man Who Gave the Long March Its Name. Gramsci invented the strategy. Dutschke named it – and then went out and implemented it, in the streets of West Berlin, in 1968, with a generation of students who had read Gramsci and were ready to march. 1. Born in East Germany in 1940, he fled to West Berlin in 1961 – two days before the Wall went up. He had seen actually existing socialism from the inside – and concluded not that the project was wrong, but that the method was. He didn’t want that version. He wanted a better one – built from the inside of the Western institutions rather than imposed from above by a party apparatus. 2. He read Gramsci. He read Mao. And he synthesized them into the phrase that named the entire project: der lange Marsch durch die Institutionen – the long march through the institutions. Not Gramsci’s phrase. Dutschke’s. Gramsci had described the mechanism. Dutschke gave it the slogan that made it actionable, transmissible, and operational for an entire generation. The phrase spread across Europe in 1968 like a match dropped in dry grass. Every student who heard it understood immediately what it meant and what it required. 3. The target was precisely identified: not the state, not the economy, but the institutions that reproduced the cultural hegemony – the universities, the media, the schools, the churches, the legal system. Infiltrate them. Occupy them from within. Replace the people who ran them with people who shared the counter-hegemonic project. Don’t storm the Reichstag. Get a job in the editorial office. Get a position in the faculty. Get appointed to the curriculum committee. The revolution would happen through tenure, not through barricades. 4. On April 11, 1968, Josef Bachmann shot Dutschke in the head on the Kurfürstendamm in West Berlin. Three bullets. Dutschke survived – but never fully recovered. He spent the rest of his life in partial recovery, moving between Germany, Denmark, and Britain, still writing, still thinking, still speaking at conferences with the damaged brain of a man who had been shot for his ideas. He died in 1979, drowning in his bathtub during an epileptic seizure caused by the brain damage from the shooting. He was thirty-nine. 5. The shooting produced something Bachmann had not intended: it made Dutschke a martyr and the movement a cause. The protests that followed — directed primarily at the Axel Springer media company, whose tabloid Bild the students blamed for inciting violence — were the largest street demonstrations in West Germany since the war. The attempt to silence the long march accelerated it. The generation radicalized by the shooting went on to become exactly what Dutschke had described: the professors, the journalists, the civil servants, the judges. The bullet proved his point. 6. Gramsci designed the theory in a prison in Italy. Dutschke gave it its name and its generation in Berlin. The 1968 student movement he led was the transmission mechanism – the moment the Prison Notebooks left the academy and became a political program with a slogan, a street presence, and a generational identity. Without Dutschke, Gramsci remains a text. With Dutschke, he becomes a movement. The long march through the institutions began, as a practical matter, in West Berlin in 1968, among students who knew precisely where they were going and had a name for the route. 7. The institutions they marched through are now theirs. The universities, the media, the civil service, the judiciary – all transformed, over fifty years, exactly as Dutschke described. He was shot for saying it could be done. It was done. The man who named the march did not live to see its completion. He died at thirty-nine in a bathtub, from the damage done by a bullet fired by someone who thought killing him would stop the march. It did not stop the march. It never does. Ideas shot in the head have a way of surviving their authors. Even the bad ones.
1,293
1,817
121
10,923
7,003,905
No country did more to make the case for free speech over the last 300 years than Britain. And yet it has made over 62,000 arrests over the last five years for "communications offences," which have included doing nothing more than watching a TikTok video. It's terrifying just how totalitarian the UK has become.
🚨 NEWS: Our groundbreaking new investigation into the scale of Britain’s free speech crisis is front page of the Mail on Sunday today. Time for @andyburnham to listen - we want a free speech reset. I’ve written to him today calling for an urgent review into our laws on speech
436
4,053
111
15,809
1,166,982
Carney is playing games for his gain and at our expense.
There is sharp disagreement about why US/Canada negotiations broke down. Both sides cannot be right: either the Americans tried to pull a fast one at five minutes to midnight, or Carney saw a chance for a political win and decided to reject the American offer, claim American bad faith, and stand up to American bullying. But the naturally refreshing pleasure of punching Uncle Sam on the nose is strategically hazardous and only justified if Carney’s account is exactly correct. Canadians are right to give their leader the benefit of the doubt, but the prime minister has a heavy duty to remove the doubt. If Carney's version of events cannot be sustained, and Canadians are forced to shoulder the brunt of ensuing economic hardship for some political stunt, or to win some byelections, his position will become untenable and it would lead to an even greater flame-out than that of John Diefenbaker in 1963.
3
88
This is far beyond. Carney and the EU globalist fuckwits are throwing Canadians under the bus. Who's telling the truth about the trade deal? I asked the U.S. Ambassado... youtu.be/e36S2i7opI4?si=o9_C… via @YouTube
2
78