And if they're in the womb they're in the world already so killing them is just lack of accountability, and dodging legal responsibility 👀

Someone just proved themselves wrong by highlighting fetus under baby...

According to the CDC, an abortion is intended to terminate a suspected or known ongoing *intrauterine* pregnancy, meaning in the uterus. An ectopic pregnancy occurs extrauterinely (outside the uterus). Keep that in mind when you read their statistics...

Gotta love the doubling down on putting certain races on the literal "pride" flag- The original pride flag actually included all demographics. Gilbert Baker had them stand for universal themes: Life, healing, sunlight, nature, harmony/art, and spirit. The new pride flag is an explicitly exclusive adaption to this, and now adding race to somehow make it more inclusive is actually defeating that very purpose further than renaming the meaning of the stripes for sexual identity, the gender indenty, and evidently it continues. And it's now a logical paradox, becomes more exculsionary with every one category it adds without another, therefore making it necessary to continue adding, and adding, and adding- The design logic has gone from conceptual inclusion to demographic representation, making it inherently exclusive.

I thought they had blocked my responses, but I made a mistake and it was the person above their account. Anyway- You pulled a brief, simplified sentence from ACOG ("a medical intervention that ends a pregnancy...") and tried to pass it off as the full clinical definition. You selectively ignored ACOG's formal standard nomenclature, which explicitly defines induced abortion as: "an intervention intended to terminate a pregnancy so that it does not result in a live birth." It's black and white, true or false statement I just made. And it's true. You're ignoring their literal glossary. Also you were flat out wrong about ACOG: ACOG worked directly with the CDC, NCHS, and other medical societies to create unified reproductive health statistics standards (such as standard reporting definitions) precisely to prevent inconsistencies in state and federal reporting

"a medical intervention that ends a pregnancy using medication or a medical procedure"... is actually a working definition *used by KFF* (Kaiser Family Foundation), link is here: "The Availability and Use of Medication Abortion | KFF" share.google/6Cymt4i70ZK3dR… ACOG defines an induced abortion as: "an intervention intended to terminate a pregnancy so that it does not result in a live birth."

They blocked my responses, so...: You pulled a brief, simplified sentence from ACOG ("a medical intervention that ends a pregnancy...") and tried to pass it off as the full clinical definition. You selectively ignored ACOG's formal standard nomenclature, which explicitly defines induced abortion as: "an intervention intended to terminate a pregnancy so that it does not result in a live birth." It's black and white, true or false statement I just made. And it's true. You're ignoring their literal glossary. Also you were flat out wrong about ACOG: ACOG worked directly with the CDC, NCHS, and other medical societies to create unified reproductive health statistics standards (such as standard reporting definitions) precisely to prevent inconsistencies in state and federal reporting.

This person posted over 30 times back to back in response to me, as I make between 1 and 3 if you count replying to multiple threads- And they blocked me right after their last post, which was this scteenshot, and is flawed. If people aren't objects, why does she think an unwanted unborn is bio waste and not a person? Double standards, based strictly on legality ✨ because if it was on biology, the unborn would be recognized legally. If it was morality/rights driven, she'd admit whose negative rights would actually be violated first. I'm not the one spamming- So its funny they they're the ones blocking my responses 🤣

When an infant displays any sign of life, they legally exist as a person under federal and state law (the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act). The state must issue a Certificate of Live Birth. If the infant passes, a Certificate of Death is issued. Standard vital reporting cannot legally classify a living infant as an aborted fetus... Because the living infant is seen as a person, whereas the aborted fetus is bio waste. Seeing the inhumanity yet? Anyway- the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), maintain strict definitions: "​Induced Abortion / Termination of Pregnancy: An intervention intended to end a pregnancy that does not result in a live birth." "​Live Birth: The complete expulsion or extraction from its mother of a product of human conception, irrespective of the duration of pregnancy, which breathes or shows any other evidence of life."