
Passionate about nature, tech, and people. Backyard scientist 🔬 | Armchair genealogist 🧬 | Advocating to save lives and build a world that works. #VaxStatRep
Joined June 2014
- Tweets115K
- Following2.7K
- Followers4.3K
- Likes54.6K
Pinned Tweet
Follow me as I seek to explain & validate the argument that wins the vaccine debate.
My🧵s in search of the truth.
1) What happened in New Zealand?
How and why does a small island country show us beyond doubt how safe vaccines are?
xitter.cf/MauritzPreller/status/…
Replying to @MauritzPreller
Clear evidence that covid vaccines are safe can be found in New Zealand, a country of ~ 5.1m people where ~12,8m vaccines were administered to date.
As the graph below from NZ health shows, most of those were administered from March 2021 to March 2022.
tewhatuora.govt.nz/our-healt…
Having researched this topic over the last few days, I find this genuinely disgusting.
Not because someone questions vaccine safety. That's entirely legitimate.
But because we're now seeing people openly celebrate the deliberate infection of children with measles, as though acquiring natural immunity somehow makes the suffering, permanent disabilities and deaths irrelevant.
"Bring back measles parties"?
SERIOUSLY???
We're talking about a disease that can cause pneumonia, brain damage, permanent deafness, blindness, immune amnesia and a devastating neurological condition that can kill children years after they appear to have recovered.
And the suggestion that surviving measles leaves children with a stronger immune system is particularly disturbing, because the scientific evidence points in the opposite direction.
Natural immunity is real. But children should not have to risk permanent disability or death to acquire protection that vaccination can provide far more safely.
Let's examine what the research actually tells us about the consequences of measles infection. 🧵👇
Replying to @AboutPediatrics
And now, all those kids who had 'the measles' are immune for life and now have a much stronger immune system. Bring back 'Measles Parties' ! 🙏🌏🙏
The only thing vaccines did was make Big pHARMa loads of cash and injure lots of kids. 💉☠️💉
@stkirsch 👇👇👇
You're confusing lifelong immunity to measles with a stronger immune system.
Yes, children who survive measles generally develop lifelong immunity to measles.
But what happens to the rest of their immune system? And what price might they pay?
1. Immune amnesia
A 2019 study published in Science examined 77 unvaccinated children before and after measles.
Researchers found that measles eliminated 11–73% of their previously recognised antibody repertoire against other pathogens.
This effect was not observed following MMR vaccination.
2. Increased infections for years
A UK study followed 2,228 children diagnosed with measles and compared them with 19,930 controls.
The measles group experienced significantly higher rates of other diagnosed infections for up to FIVE YEARS.
Independent studies in Germany (2022) and Israel (2024) found similar associations.
That's hardly evidence of a generally stronger immune system.
3. Permanent neurological damage
Approximately 1 in 1,000 measles cases develops encephalitis, which can cause permanent brain damage, intellectual disability or hearing impairment.
4. SSPE - a delayed death sentence
Some children apparently recover completely, only to develop subacute sclerosing panencephalitis years later.
This progressive neurological disease is almost always fatal.
A German population study estimated a risk of approximately 1 in 1,700–3,300 among children infected before age five.
5. Permanent hearing loss
Measles can cause irreversible hearing damage, including deafness.
The exact contemporary incidence remains uncertain, but the complication is well documented.
6. Blindness
Measles can cause severe eye complications and permanent blindness, particularly in children with vitamin A deficiency.
And we haven't even counted pneumonia, secondary bacterial infections, hospitalisations and deaths during the acute illness.
Vaccines aren't risk-free. Serious adverse reactions can occur, and those risks deserve honest discussion.
But two doses of MMR provide approximately 97% protection against measles without exposing children to the risks of natural infection.
Natural immunity is real. So are the children who suffer permanent disability, immune impairment or death acquiring it.
A measles party isn't an immune-system upgrade. It's deliberately exposing children to a disease with well-established, sometimes lifelong consequences.
The research:
1. Immune amnesia — Mina et al., Science (2019):
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/article…
2. UK 5-year cohort (2018):
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/article…
3. German cohort (2022):
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/article…
4. Israeli cohort (2024):
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3914…
5. SSPE risk — Schönberger et al. (2013):
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/article…
6. CDC — Measles complications:
cdc.gov/measles/hcp/clinical…
7. WHO — Measles complications and long-term effects:
who.int/news-room/questions-…
If you're seriously considering deliberately exposing your unvaccinated child to measles, at least have the decency to understand the risks you're imposing on them.
And if you're determined to leave them unvaccinated, at least do everything possible to protect them during their most vulnerable early years.
The evidence is clear: children under five, particularly infants, face greater risks of serious measles complications.
The risk of SSPE, a devastating and usually fatal brain disease that can emerge years after infection, is particularly concerning in children infected at very young ages.
A German study estimated that approximately 1 in 1,700–3,300 children infected before age five subsequently developed SSPE.
And while children aged 5–19 generally experience fewer acute complications, the risk rises again in adulthood.
The age at which a child contracts measles matters. It can affect the consequences, sometimes profoundly.
But there is a much better option than trying to choose a supposedly safer age for infection.
Don't deliberately expose them at all. Protect them through vaccination.
Sources:
SSPE risk: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/article…
Age and measles severity (2025): pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/article…
Just when they thought they could believe the narrative Kennedy had to face and admit the hard truth.
Watching the recent Kennedy video is heartbreaking.
I have an autistic son. I’m a paramedic who’s seen ungodly amounts of damage from vaccines.
Kennedy knows appropriate testing was never done. He knows the harm. He even knows the autism link.
Yet here he is playing politics and giving Fauci cover on measles.
No.
This makes me sick.
I like you Kennedy, I always have. But this is bullshit!
God bless
The reason the 1917–1918 US Army measles epidemic changed medicine is because it helped establish how viral infections can lead to deadly bacterial pneumonia, transformed the treatment of lung complications, and introduced coordinated approaches to investigating and controlling epidemics.
5. Creating a model for investigating future epidemics
Hundreds of physicians and scientists collaborated across pathology, microbiology, surgery, radiology, internal medicine and preventive medicine.
Rather than studying each complication independently, they combined their observations to understand the entire disease process.
The lessons were applied almost immediately when the 1918 influenza pandemic struck the same military camps.
According to the authors, the measles investigations provided an important foundation for the military's subsequent influenza response.
1917–1918, measles killed more than 3,000 US soldiers and helped transform medicine.
The epidemic revealed how viral infection and bacterial pneumonia could combine to become deadly, revolutionised treatment of lung complications, and helped establish modern epidemic investigation.
More than a century later, those lessons remain relevant as measles mortality is not determined by the virus alone. It is influenced by bacterial exposure, population vulnerability and the medical care available.
A forgotten epidemic that changed medicine: measles in the US Army, 1917–18
Published in The Lancet Infectious Diseases.
Morens DM & Taubenberger JK (2015),
For in case we have a few measles deniers at the back.
The lesson is not "people died of bacteria, not measles."
Measles helped make bacterial pneumonia lethal.
Vaccination reduces the chance of entering that chain. Treatment can reduce risk afterward.
Both are important.
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/article…
The reason the 1917–1918 US Army measles epidemic changed medicine...











