Mark Zobeck (@MarkZobeck) header
Mark Zobeck (@MarkZobeck) profile picture

MD, MPH. Peds Hem/Onc. Data nerd using technology to improve healthcare for kids around the world. Love languages: graphs, references, Bayesian statistics

Joined November 2012
Photo by Mark Zobeck (@MarkZobeck)Photo by Mark Zobeck (@MarkZobeck)Photo by Mark Zobeck (@MarkZobeck)Photo by Mark Zobeck (@MarkZobeck)Photo by Mark Zobeck (@MarkZobeck)Photo by Mark Zobeck (@MarkZobeck)Photo by Mark Zobeck (@MarkZobeck)Photo by Mark Zobeck (@MarkZobeck)Photo by Mark Zobeck (@MarkZobeck)Photo by Mark Zobeck (@MarkZobeck)
I'm a doctor who does research. I've annoyed DOZENS of statisticians. Here are 5 proven ways to exasperate them. #medtwitter #epitwitter #statstwitter
92
685
282
3,565
Mark Zobeck retweeted
OpenAI was hacked via the exact library mentioned in the xkcd comic hahahaha The prophecy is fulfilled
On July 25, we hacked OpenAI. Two bugs let us take over ChatGPT/Codex accounts of OpenAI employees (+some unaffiliated users) and reach connected services: Outlook, Slack, GitHub, etc. We proved it with a PR in OpenAI’s internal codebase . It took us <72h. 🧵
49
1,038
26
12,055
545,924
Elon buying Twitter and restoring free speech was unironically one of the most pivotal moments in the 21st century Its effects will be studied for generations
The rise and fall of wokeness: DEI commitments in corporate securities disclosures filed with the SEC. To me this seems a trailing indicator; most other measures of wokeness take off well before 2019 and peak in 2020 or 2021. But the shape! That's what a moral fashion looks like.
335
1,911
143
17,283
4,272,132
There is a super shady data control setting on everyone's ChatGPT which makes it seem like your data can be used for training even if you explicitly say to *NOT* improve the model for everyone (1/9)
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
This claim is false. OpenAI has clarified that the in-app toggle and the privacy portal are independent ways to opt out of data training. You only need to use one method, and OpenAI respects the opt-out choice regardless of where it is set. x.com/thsottiaux/sta… help.openai.com/articles/77308…
137
426
148
3,544
1,674,509
Mark Zobeck retweeted
I've probably read this paper + blog post dozens of times by now, and they remain some of the best pieces out there to revisit before getting into your own work (regardless of discipline).
11
39
7
433
64,484
👀Un estudio pone a prueba ChatGPT en el trabajo de un bioestadístico y estos son los resultados más interesantes. Hilo👇 onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/… Desplaza la discusión desde la productividad y la automatización hacia la supervisión y la validación. El tema de mi próximo curso.
6
150
1
636
43,757
What changes about cancer care for children around the world if useful artificial intelligence becomes available wherever care is delivered? Cara improves and science accelerates...but only if, as in all areas of global health, we can go the last mile. New talk! (link below👇)
1
87
We've added to the website a free PDF of the Bayesian Workflow book (for non-commercial purposes, like research and exorcism). We put so much work into this book, hope you all find value in it. avehtari.github.io/Bayesian-…
The Bayesian Workflow book is out in print now, just in time to distract you from *gestures all around*. Some links below to code and other resources:
14
163
9
669
73,957
1/ The bitter lesson is true right now for clinical AI. And that is ok.
2
56
That is why the bitter lesson being true right now is ok. It shifts the durable work toward the harness: governance, retrieval, citation standards, audit trails, escalation rules, input/output controls, and workflow design.
1
14
The practical lesson is to build for model churn. Assume better general models will keep arriving, then build infrastructure that can use them safely and keep responsibility where it belongs. thedoctorsdialectic.com/docs…
12
A lot of clinicians are stuck at the same point with AI: “I see the potential, but what do I actually do with it?” My answer is small: pick one workflow where verification is faster than generation.
1
80
The hard requirement is that you have to know what correct looks like. If you ask for “something good,” you will get something plausible. If you know the standards, you can verify. That is where the leverage starts.
1
15