Mark Reckless retweeted
Another British #WarOnPrices
Judges determine a market rent. Judges also determine the wage of store staff relative to warehouse staff unless the company can prove the market rate is justified.
NUTS.
Property Tribunal judgment
Tenant challenges £50 rent increase for rent at £1,650 per month. Judgment decides that market rent is £1450.
assets.publishing.service.go…
Mark Reckless retweeted
It isn't even remotely surprising any more
🚨JUST IN: BBC AI chief previously jailed for immigration offences after al-Qaeda manual found.
• An Algerian migrant who was once found in possession of an al-Qaeda training manual is now principal data scientist in the Responsible AI division at the BBC.
• Hicham Yezza was working at the University of Nottingham in 2008 when the document was discovered on his computer; he and a colleague were arrested under the Terrorism Act but released without charge after he said it had been sent for printing.
• He was then rearrested under immigration rules and sentenced in 2009 to nine months in prison for an offence related to his claim of having permission to remain in Britain; he served five months and is now a British citizen.
• Before joining the BBC he worked as an editor and later as an Al Jazeera consultant, and held editorial roles at the corporation including as a Middle East and North Africa expert.
• Prior to his BBC employment he posted online about the occupation and apartheid in Israel and described rockets fired from Gaza as resistance.
Mark Reckless retweeted
So basically, you can accept any rent a landlord asks for and then retrospectively claim you were desperate, and a tribunal will change your rent because some properties that aren't the same size or even in the same building are being advertised at a lower price.
The long march towards Total Judicial Communism continues. We have devolved price setting to a couple of former solicitors scrolling Zoopla. Madness. telegraph.co.uk/money/proper…
Mark Reckless retweeted
The French government has totally lost control.
Reform UK has a plan to secure our borders and strengthen law & order, stopping this from ever happening here.
Mark Reckless retweeted
Huge congratulations from everyone at Reform UK to Richard Tice and Isabel Oakeshott on their marriage yesterday. 🍾
… and immigration judges tend to favour immigrants, having been appointed from their barristers, not the unqualified Home Office civil servants
Pleased to work with the Telegraph on this story. @Govt_Reform found job adverts showing that the Home Office routinely hires officials without any legal qualifications or even existing legal knowledge to defend deportation decisions - going up against qualified barristers representing asylum seekers. All paid for by us of course. Little wonder the government loses 64% of these cases.
The whole thing is an utter farce
telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/10…
As immigrants get legal aid lawyers, but Home Office doesn’t, immigration judges are then recruited from the lawyers who argue for immigrants. Crazy system.
Infuriating. The Home Office is recruiting people who have no legal qualifications to represent cases for deporting illegal migration. The State pours millions of OUR money into supporting the migrants to break into our country, but won't even fork out for proper legal representation to deport them. How are we supposed to view this as anything other than a total stitch up?
telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/10…
There's a new version of this post
Mark Reckless retweeted
The Empire suppressed the self-immolation of widows and female infanticide in India and female genital mutilation in Africa. It moderated the disruptive impact of the inevitable arrival of Western modernity upon very unmodern societies in North America and especially Australia. It created regional peace by imposing an overarching imperial authority on multiple, warring peoples—unifying, for example, much of the Indian subcontinent. It promoted a worldwide free market, protected by the Royal Navy, that gave native producers and entrepreneurs in India and West Africa new economic opportunities. It made foreign investment attractive by reducing risk through establishing political stability and the rule of law. Consequently, Australia’s gross domestic product per capita became the highest in the world by 1890, and by 1914 India was the world’s fourth largest textile-producer. The Empire built canals in India, bringing five times as much land under irrigation as the Mughals had in the 18th century. By 1900 it had figured out how to prevent food shortage escalating into famine there and went on to fight disease in tropical Africa. It provided a civil service and judiciary that was generally and extraordinarily incorrupt. It introduced liberal ideas and liberal institutions of a free press and representative government to places that had never known them. New Zealand was the first country in the world to grant the vote to men and women on equal terms, in 1893, and by 1935 electoral democracy had been established in Indian provinces. From May 1940, when France fell, to June 1941, when Germany invaded the Soviet Union, The British Empire offered Nazi Germany the only military resistance—with the sole exception of Greece. Inspired by the ideal of the Commonwealth, it helped to plan and realise the League of Nations after the First World War and the United Nations after 1945. And it brought up three of the most prosperous and liberal states in the world—Canada, Australia and New Zealand—and gave birth to one more, the United States. Significantly, there is evidence that all of these former members of the British Empire are among the least racist countries on earth.
Read our latest here: nigelbiggar.co.uk/p/empire-a…
Mark Reckless retweeted
I have had to delay getting a new car due to the cost. I work, and have to be careful with my money in part due to how heavily I am taxed. Those on PIP casually fill out a form to get a new car with no such concern. And I have to pay for it.
One in seven new cars sold in the UK is paid for by a disability welfare program wsj.com/world/uk/united-king…
Mark Reckless retweeted
Burnham has no mandate for this. Either shut up about it, or call a general election…
Andy Burnham expected to tell the Commons it would be a "dereliction of duty" to turn down a closer relationship with EU
bbc.in/3TOavvp
Mark Reckless retweeted
Reform councillor says it's not appropriate to promote sex acts/toys/images in a public library next to the children's area. The Council reprimanded him and told him he had to go on a course to be re-educated! Authorities in this country had gone MAD. Absolutely bonkers.
Mark Reckless retweeted
Throwing rubbish in a landfill is (usually) better for the environment than recycling it. With few exceptions, recycling ends up emitting more CO2 and costing more money, while landfills are cheap and secure.
- Recycling mid-tier plastics (like plastic bottles or butter tubs) costs thousands of dollars per ton of CO2 saved. It's cheaper to do direct air CO2 capture than that! And there is no shortage of plastic, nor any problem with sequestering it in the ground once we're done with it.
- Modern landfills are extraordinarily secure and are *much* more than just big piles of trash. They capture 75%–95% of methane gas. Groundwater contamination is doesn't really happen with landfills built since 1990. A study of 31 landfills built since 1988 in NY found no adverse effect at all on local groundwater quality.
- The crusade against single-use plastics has driven us to products that use far more materials and energy and would need to be used an absurd number of times to actually be an improvement. A steel straw needs to be used 150 times to be worth using. A ceramic mug needs to be used 1,000 times to beat a polystyrene cup. A cotton bag needs to be reused 173 times to beat single-use.
- Some things ARE worth recycling. Recycling metal saves a huge amount of energy and material – recycling aluminium saves 95% of the energy spent on making fresh stuff. So we do a lot of it already: about 30% of steel worldwide is recycled.
Modern, well-run landfills cause minimal environmental damage. We have plenty of space for them – less than 0.01% of the US is used for landfill and only about 0.02% of Germany. We can even build on top of old landfills, so the land area is not spent permanently.
New in @WorksInProgMag, @robertwiblin and @chalmermagne on why it's usually best to just bury your trash. worksinprogress.co/issue/jus…
Except it is not a tax. Taxes can raise money to fund public services. This is a forced transfer from consumer to retailer with no benefit to public purse.
Your opportunity to register your objection to this unfair Tax!
Petition: Abolish the the Minimum Unit Price of alcohol in retailers petitions.senedd.wales/petit…
I recall questioning the impressive Sara Rowbotham on @CommonsHomeAffs and contrasted her efforts in Rochdale with Joyce Thacker lack of action in Rotherham
She raised the alarm 181 times.
181 separate referrals, about girls being groomed and abused in one northern town.
For years, almost nothing happened.
Then they made her redundant.
Her name was Sara Rowbotham.
She was born in Middleton, Greater Manchester. She was not a police officer, not a senior manager, not a politician. She worked for the NHS in Rochdale, on a small team called the Crisis Intervention Team, offering sexual health support to young people.
She started there in 2004.
It was the kind of job where teenagers told you things they told nobody else.
And what they were telling her was horrifying.
Young girls, many of them vulnerable, many of them already known to services, were being groomed, passed around and sexually exploited by groups of men.
This was not a rumour. It was not one case. It was a pattern.
So she did exactly what she was supposed to do.
She reported it.
Between 2005 and 2011, Sara and her team made 181 referrals detailing the abuse and grooming of young people.
181.
Each one was a child. Each one was a warning.
Here is the part that should make people angry.
Those warnings went to the agencies whose job was to protect children. And again and again, they were not acted on. Some of the girls were treated as if they were making choices about their own lives, rather than as children being abused.
Think about what that actually meant. A girl of thirteen or fourteen, being exploited by grown men, and the system looking at her and seeing a problem teenager instead of a victim.
Sara would not accept that.
She kept reporting. She kept pushing. She kept telling anyone who would listen that this was happening, and it was happening now.
In May 2012, nine men were convicted in the Rochdale grooming case.
Suddenly, everyone wanted to know how it had been allowed to go on for so long.
That year, Sara gave evidence. She told the Home Affairs Select Committee in Parliament that Rochdale's child protection services had failed to act on her alerts, and that the abuse had been widespread.
She said it in public. About the system she still worked within.
Two years later, in 2014, she was made redundant.
Two more years.
Then gone.
The woman who had done more than almost anyone to expose what happened in Rochdale was out of a job.
For a while, it looked as if that would be the end of it. Another person who had told the truth, quietly moved aside.
Then, in May 2017, the BBC broadcast a drama called Three Girls, based on the Rochdale case.
Sara was in it. The actress Maxine Peake played her.
Millions of people watched a sexual health worker refuse, again and again, to let it go, and wondered who she really was.
Within days, a petition was started calling for her to be formally recognised. It gathered more than 275,000 signatures.
Consider what it took to get there. Years of being ignored by the people who should have listened. Losing her job. And it took a television drama for the country to find out her name.
By then, she had already found another way to serve the town.
She was elected as a local councillor for North Middleton, and she went on to become Deputy Leader of Rochdale Borough Council and its cabinet member for health and wellbeing.
The woman who had been pushed out of the system ended up helping to run part of it.
In 2018, she received a Special Recognition Award at the NHS Heroes Awards. That October she became an honorary member of the NSPCC's council.
In 2021, she was appointed MBE for services to young people.
Her case became one of the clearest examples in modern Britain of what happens when a frontline worker sees abuse and the institutions above her do not respond. It is now part of how social workers, health workers and police are trained to think about exploitation, and part of an ongoing national reckoning with grooming gangs that has still not finished.
What an amazing thoughtful piece from @GHWTowler who deserves an apology from @DPJHodges
gawaintowler.substack.com/p/…
Mark Reckless retweeted
A woman was murdered because Labour chose to let a violent man out early.
It took Robert Sabat 11 days to reoffend, stabbing and suffocating his own half-sister after he was released through Labour’s Early Release Scheme.
She suffered eight stab wounds, alongside broken bones.
Her face was 'virtually unrecognisable' at the mortuary.
When paramedics arrived on the scene, Sabat charged at them with a knife.
He told police he was going on a "murder spree."
This was totally preventable.
Sabat had 4 prior convictions, including for stabbing someone in the throat with a knife back in 2014.
How could anyone think it was the right call to unleash him onto our streets?
The Tories and Labour created this monstrous system.
Reform will deport all foreigners in our jails and launch the fastest expansion of the prison estate in our history.
We will keep violent thugs where they belong: behind bars.

































